Method to improve virus filtration capacity

Patent No. US10662237 (titled "Method to improve virus filtration capacity") on Aug 6, 2010. The application was issued on May 26, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’237 is related to the field of protein purification, specifically addressing the challenges of removing viral contaminants from recombinant protein therapeutics. In the production of biologics using mammalian cell lines, ensuring the removal of endogenous and adventitious viruses is a critical safety requirement. While size-exclusion virus filtration is a robust method for clearing small pathogens like parvoviruses, these high-selectivity membranes are highly susceptible to fouling by trace impurities, which significantly limits their processing capacity and increases manufacturing costs.

The underlying idea behind ’237 is that the premature clogging of parvovirus filters is caused by multiple distinct classes of foulants that cannot be addressed by a single prefiltration mechanism. While prior approaches focused on using either depth filters or cation-exchange media to capture protein aggregates, the inventors discovered a synergistic effect when combining cation-exchange and endotoxin removal steps. By targeting different physicochemical species simultaneously, this dual-action prefiltration train prevents the adsorption of diverse impurities onto the virus filter’s pore walls, maintaining high flux and throughput.

The claims of ’237 focus on a method for enhancing the capacity of a virus filter by implementing both a cation exchange step and an endotoxin removal step immediately before the filtration of a recombinant protein. This specific sequence or combination is designed to treat compositions produced in mammalian host cells that may contain parvovirus contaminants. The independent claims require that this combined prefiltration approach achieves a 1.5 to 20-fold increase in the filter’s mass capacity (kg/m²) compared to using no prefiltration or either individual step alone.

In practice, the invention is implemented by passing a chromatography pool—such as a monoclonal antibody stream—through a filtration train where the two media act as protective barriers for the final 20 nm parvovirus filter. The implementation utilizes membrane adsorbers for both the cation exchange and endotoxin removal functions, which can be arranged in either order or housed within a single module. This setup allows for continuous processing across a wide pH range (4 to 10) and varying protein concentrations, ensuring that the fine retentive layer of the virus filter remains unobstructed by the complex impurity profile of the feedstock.

This approach differentiates itself from prior art by moving away from natural depth filters, which often suffer from lot-to-lot variability and the risk of leaching metals or beta-glycans into the purified product. Unlike methods that rely solely on negatively charged adsorbers to catch aggregates, this invention recognizes that endotoxin removal media—typically featuring positively charged surfaces or affinity ligands—capture a separate class of foulants. By addressing these multiple fouling pathways, the method provides a more robust and scalable solution for high-titer antibody manufacturing without the drawbacks of traditional clarification media.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’237 was filed, downstream purification of recombinant proteins typically relied on size-exclusion virus filtration to mitigate risks of adventitious contamination from mammalian cell lines. At a time when parvovirus-retentive membranes (nominal pore sizes of approximately 20 nm) were increasingly adopted to remove small viruses while allowing the passage of large therapeutic proteins like monoclonal antibodies, systems commonly relied on single-stage prefiltration or depth filtration to protect these sensitive membranes. Technical constraints made maintaining high filtration capacity non-trivial, as the thin retentive layers of parvovirus filters were highly susceptible to fouling by impurities such as protein aggregates and denatured proteins, which often led to rapid flux decay and compromised viral retention.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention addresses the technical problem of premature virus filter fouling by identifying that standard prefiltration methods targeting protein aggregates are insufficient for optimizing filter capacity. The architectural solution involves an integrated prefiltration sequence that combines a cation exchange step with a specific endotoxin removal step prior to virus filtration. This dual-mechanism approach achieves a technical effect of significantly increasing filtration throughput and capacity compared to using cation-exchange media alone. By specifically targeting endotoxins in conjunction with ion-exchangeable foulants, the process overcomes the technical constraint of rapid membrane plugging, enabling more robust and efficient purification of high-molecular-weight therapeutic proteins.

Claims

This patent contains a total of 54 claims, with claims 1 and 23 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a method for virus filtration that improves filtration capacity by subjecting a protein or monoclonal antibody composition to a combined cation exchange step and an endotoxin removal step immediately before a virus filter. The dependent claims serve to specify various operational parameters and materials, such as filter pore sizes, specific host cell types, the sequence and timing of the prefiltration steps, protein concentrations, pH ranges, and the specific types of chromatography pools or membrane adsorbers utilized in the process.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Cation exchange step
(Claim 1, Claim 23)
The cation exchange step is used to remove positively charged contaminant species including residual HCP and product aggregates. It may involve a strong cation exchange membrane adsorber as a prefilter to a parvovirus retentive filter. This step is hypothesized to remove large molecular weight (˜600-1500 kD) protein aggregates from the feedstream by competitive adsorption.A prefiltration process using cation-exchange media to remove positively charged contaminant species, such as protein aggregates or host cell proteins, from the protein composition.
Endotoxin removal step
(Claim 1, Claim 23)
The invention concerns methods for increasing the filtration capacity of virus filters by combined use of endotoxin removal and cation-exchange media in the prefiltration process. The endotoxin removal step can be performed using an endotoxin removal membrane adsorber. This step, in combination with cation exchange, addresses fouling caused by impurities other than protein aggregates.A purification process specifically designed to remove endotoxins from the protein feedstream to prevent fouling of the subsequent virus filter.
Filtration capacity
(Claim 1, Claim 23)
The invention provides a method of improving the filtration capacity of a virus filter during protein purification. Fouling of the virus filters by impurities results in lower filter capacity and flux. The combined use of endotoxin removal and cation-exchange media improves this capacity significantly compared to using either step alone.The amount of protein composition that can be processed through a filter (measured in kg/m²) before the filter fouls or the flux decreases significantly.
Parvovirus contaminant
(Claim 1, Claim 23)
The virus to be removed is a parvovirus, which typically has a diameter between about 18 and about 26 nm. Recent advances in membrane technology have enabled manufacturing of high throughput membranes with nominal pore size of 20 nm that are retentive to parvoviruses. These viruses represent a risk for potential adventitious virus contamination in mammalian cell lines.Small, non-enveloped DNA viruses, typically 18-26 nm in diameter, which are potential adventitious or endogenous contaminants in mammalian cell culture-derived proteins.
Virus filter
(Claim 1, Claim 23)
Virus filtration removes viruses by size exclusion and is considered a robust technique. These filters often comprise a thin retentive membrane layer on a microporous substrate with nominal pore sizes of approximately 20 nm. They are capable of removing parvoviruses (18-26 nm diameter) while allowing passage of proteins as large as 160 kD.A size-exclusion membrane, typically with a nominal pore size between 15 and 100 nm, designed to retain viruses while allowing the protein of interest to pass.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:25-cv-14648Aug 14, 2025Genentech, Inc. V. Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.
1:23-cv-11573Jul 13, 2023Genentech, Inc. V. Biogen Ma Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10662237

Application Number
US12806171A
Filing Date
Aug 6, 2010
Publication Date
May 26, 2020
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents