Canister purge system and method for diagnosing purge valve thereof

Patent No. US10697399 (titled "Canister purge system and method for diagnosing purge valve thereof") on Oct 26, 2018. The application was issued on Jun 30, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’399 is related to the field of automotive evaporative emission control systems, specifically focusing on the diagnosis of canister purge systems. In modern vehicles, especially those with low manifold vacuum like turbocharged or hybrid engines, a dedicated pump is often required to draw fuel vapors from the storage canister and force them into the engine intake. If the control valve in this line fails to open correctly, the system cannot effectively clear the canister, leading to potential emission compliance issues or fuel tank pressure problems.

The underlying idea behind ’399 is that a failure in the purge valve—specifically a close stuck state—can be accurately detected and categorized by monitoring the pressure differential across the purge pump itself. Rather than relying on complex flow meters or indirect engine performance metrics, the invention recognizes that a blockage downstream of the pump will cause predictable, measurable deviations in both the suction side and the discharge side of the pump compared to normal operating conditions.

The claims of ’399 focus on a diagnostic method and system that utilizes a dual-sensor configuration to monitor the purge line. Specifically, the system measures an upstream pressure between the canister and the pump and a downstream pressure between the pump and the purge valve. By analyzing these two specific data points while the pump is active and the valve is commanded open, the controller can distinguish between a healthy system and one suffering from a mechanical valve failure.

In practice, the system differentiates between a total blockage and a partial restriction by comparing the measured pressures against calibrated reference values. If the downstream pressure rises above a normal threshold, it indicates a bottleneck. The system then checks the upstream pressure; if that pressure returns to near-atmospheric levels after an initial drop, it signifies a high-level close stuck state where flow is completely halted. Conversely, if the upstream suction remains low but the downstream pressure is elevated, the system identifies a partial or middle-level restriction.

This approach differs from prior solutions by providing a granular diagnosis of the valve's physical state without requiring additional hardware beyond standard pressure transducers. By correlating the pump RPM to the expected suction pressure, the invention ensures that the diagnostic logic remains accurate across varying pump speeds. This allows the vehicle's onboard diagnostics to not only detect a failure but also characterize the severity of the flow resistance, improving the reliability of emission monitoring systems.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2010s when ’399 was filed, evaporative emission control systems were transitioning toward active architectures at a time when internal combustion engines were typically implemented using turbocharging or hybrid configurations that resulted in insufficient manifold vacuum. When systems commonly relied on passive pressure differentials to draw fuel vapors from a canister into the intake manifold, the introduction of forced induction or electric-assist modes made traditional purge methods unreliable. Consequently, hardware constraints necessitated the integration of dedicated purge pumps to facilitate vapor transfer, yet these active components introduced new diagnostic complexities, particularly when software logic was required to distinguish between pump performance issues and mechanical failures of the control valves within the flow path.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention addresses the technical problem of accurately diagnosing a 'close stuck' state in a purge valve within an active canister purge system, where traditional vacuum-based monitoring is ineffective. The architectural solution involves a dual-sensor configuration that monitors pressure at both the upstream and downstream ends of a purge pump to evaluate flow resistance across the purge valve. By comparing these differential pressure readings against calibrated reference values while the pump is active, the system achieves the technical effect of distinguishing between a total blockage and a partial flow restriction. This multi-level diagnostic capability enables the detection of varying degrees of valve failure, overcoming the constraint of binary fault detection and ensuring precise monitoring of evaporative emission flow even in engines with low negative pressure.

Claims

This patent contains 16 claims, with claims 1 and 8 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a method and a system for diagnosing a close stuck state in a canister purge valve by comparing upstream and downstream pressures relative to a purge pump while the pump is operating. The dependent claims provide additional technical details regarding the specific placement of pressure sensors, the use of preset reference pressures to distinguish between high-level and middle-level stuck states, and the timing of pressure measurements relative to valve operation.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Close stuck state
(Claim 1, Claim 8)
The high-level close stuck state is a state that close stuck occurs in the purge valve such that flow of the evaporative emission is blocked by the purge valve. The middle-level close stuck state is a state that the close stuck partially occurs in the purge valve such that the evaporative emission is allowed to pass through the purge valve and a flow resistance of the evaporative emission is more increased as compared to a flow resistance when the purge valve is in a normal state.A malfunction condition of the purge valve ranging from a partial blockage that increases flow resistance to a complete blockage that entirely prevents the flow of evaporative emission despite the valve being commanded to an open state.
Downstream pressure
(Claim 1, Claim 8)
Preferably, the downstream pressure is measured by using a second pressure sensor installed to be positioned at a rear end of the purge pump. The canister purge system further includes a second pressure sensor installed on the fuel tank vapor line to be interposed between the purge pump and the purge valve and measuring the downstream pressure.The fluid pressure measured within the purge pipe or fuel tank vapor line at a location between the outlet (rear end) of the purge pump and the purge valve.
Purge pump
(Claim 1, Claim 8)
An active canister purge system is applied to a vehicle... with a purge pump which forcibly pumps the evaporative emission captured in the canister and transfers the evaporative emission to the intake system of the engine. The purge pump is used to pump evaporative emission captured in the canister toward the intake system.An active pumping component installed on the purge line configured to forcibly move captured evaporative emissions from the canister toward the engine intake system, particularly when engine negative pressure is insufficient.
Purge valve
(Claim 1, Claim 8)
A purge control solenoid valve (PCSV) (hereinafter, referred to as “a purge valve”) mounted on a purge pipe connecting the canister with an intake system of an engine. The purge valve is installed on a fuel tank vapor line... allowing or blocking a flow of the evaporative emission through the fuel tank vapor line.A solenoid-actuated valve (PCSV) located on the purge pipe between the purge pump and the engine intake system that selectively allows or blocks the flow of evaporative emissions.
Upstream pressure
(Claim 1, Claim 8)
Preferably, the upstream pressure is measured by using a first pressure sensor installed to be positioned at a front end of the purge pump. The canister purge system further includes a first pressure sensor installed on the fuel tank vapor line to be interposed between the purge pump and the canister and measuring the upstream pressure.The fluid pressure measured within the purge pipe or fuel tank vapor line at a location between the canister and the inlet (front end) of the purge pump.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-00239May 14, 2025Champion Power Equipment, Inc. V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10697399

Application Number
US16171642A
Filing Date
Oct 26, 2018
Publication Date
Jun 30, 2020
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents