Tape measure with tape blade profile increasing tape standout

Patent No. US10712142 (titled "Tape measure with tape blade profile increasing tape standout") on Aug 27, 2018. The application was issued on Jul 14, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’142 is related to the field of hand tools, specifically retractable tape measures used in construction and building trades. It addresses the technical challenge of maximizing standout distance—the length a blade can extend horizontally before buckling under its own weight—while maintaining a compact housing and manageable retraction forces. Traditional designs often struggle to balance the rigidity needed for long standout with the flexibility required for compact storage on a spring-driven reel.

The underlying idea behind ’142 is that standout performance is primarily a function of the blade's cross-sectional geometry rather than just material thickness. By employing an aggressive curvature profile, the invention creates a high-rigidity structure that resists buckling even when using relatively thin or narrow steel cores. The key insight is that specific ratios between the blade's flat width, its curved height, and its compressed curved width can significantly shift the point at which the metal reaches its structural limit, allowing for standout distances exceeding 150 inches.

The claims of ’142 focus on the specific geometric proportions of the blade’s concavo-convex profile in relation to its flat width. For blades narrower than 32 mm, the claims require a curved-width-to-flat-width ratio of less than 0.74 and a height ratio greater than 0.29. For wider blades, the geometry becomes even more pronounced, requiring a width ratio below 0.70 and a height ratio above 0.31. These precise mathematical constraints define a blade that is more deeply cupped than standard measuring tools, directly enabling the claimed standout thresholds of 132 to 150 inches.

In practice, the invention utilizes a multi-layered construction consisting of a thin metal core sandwiched between upper and lower polymer coatings. This composite structure allows the blade to survive the high-stress environment of a tight compound curve without cracking. The profile is engineered so that the central portion of the blade has a tighter radius of curvature for structural strength, while the outer edges may be slightly flattened. This hybrid approach ensures that the measurement markings remain readable and the blade can still be coiled efficiently by a standard spring-driven retraction system.

This invention differentiates itself from prior approaches by breaking the traditional dependency between steel thickness and rigidity. While older designs relied on heavier, thicker steel to achieve longer reach—which increased weight and required larger, high-torque springs—this design achieves superior standout through geometric stiffening. By optimizing the arc height and width ratios, the blade remains lightweight and flexible enough for easy retraction while providing a stable, long-reaching horizontal extension that outperforms conventional flat-profile or shallow-curve alternatives.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2010s when ’142 was filed, retractable measurement tools were typically implemented using metal blades with a shallow concave cross-section to provide a degree of structural rigidity during extension. At a time when systems commonly relied on increasing the thickness or width of the metal substrate to improve the self-supporting extension distance, hardware constraints made achieving significant standout non-trivial without resulting in a bulky housing or a heavy, difficult-to-retract blade. Engineering practices generally balanced the curvature of the blade against the need for legible markings and the mechanical limits of the internal spring-driven winding mechanisms.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention achieves a meaningful technical advancement by optimizing the geometric profile of the tape blade to maximize standout distance while maintaining a compact form factor. By implementing a specific architectural shift in the blade’s cross-sectional geometry—characterized by precise ratios between curved height, curved width, and flat width—the system overcomes the technical constraint of blade buckling under its own weight. This integration of a steepened curvature, potentially localized to high-stress zones or combined with flattened outer segments for readability, enables a significant increase in the self-supporting length of the blade without requiring a corresponding increase in material thickness or total width.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 20 claims, with claims 1, 5, and 9 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on the structural configuration of a tape measure, specifically defining the geometric ratios between the blade's flat width, curved width, and curved height, as well as the polymer coating thicknesses and core dimensions required to achieve a standout distance exceeding 132 or 150 inches. The dependent claims serve to further specify the mechanical properties of the retraction system, provide narrower ranges for the blade dimensions and standout distances, and detail the material composition and lengthwise distribution of the curved profile.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Curved height
(Claim 1, Claim 5)
In a specific embodiment, the tape blade has a flat width less than 27.94 mm and a curved height greater than 6.3 mm. The elongate blade includes a curved profile such that the uppermost surface defines a concave surface, the lowermost surface defines a convex surface, a curved width and a curved height. A ratio of the curved height to the flat width of the elongate metal core is greater than 0.29 or 0.31 depending on the embodiment.The vertical distance from the lowest point of the convex bottom surface to the highest point of the blade edges in a cross-sectional view.
Curved profile
(Claim 1, Claim 5, Claim 9)
The elongate blade includes a curved profile such that the uppermost surface of the elongate blade defines a concave surface, the lowermost surface defines a convex surface, a curved width and a curved height. Applicant has determined that by shaping the tape blade to a relatively aggressive or steep curved profile shape, tape standout can be increased and tape droop can be decreased greatly. The central widthwise portion of the tape blade includes a highly curved, rigidity increasing profile shape.The non-planar cross-sectional geometry of the blade, characterized by a concave upper surface and a convex lower surface to provide structural rigidity.
Curved width
(Claim 1, Claim 5, Claim 9)
In a specific embodiment, the tape blade has a flat width less than 27.94 mm and a curved width less than 22.5 mm. The elongate blade includes a curved profile such that the uppermost surface defines a concave surface, the lowermost surface defines a convex surface, a curved width and a curved height. Ratios of the curved width to a flat width of the elongate metal core are used to define the aggressive profile.The lateral distance between the outer edges of the tape blade when it is in its curved, non-flattened state.
Elongate metal core
(Claim 1, Claim 5)
The elongate blade includes an elongate metal core having an upper surface, a lower surface and a first thickness, T1, measured between the upper surface and the lower surface. In a specific embodiment, the tape blade has a metal thickness of less than 0.13 mm, specifically between 0.09 mm and 0.13 mm.The central structural metal component of the blade, having a specific thickness (T1) and providing the primary rigidity for the tape.
Flat width
(Claim 1, Claim 5, Claim 9)
In a specific embodiment, the tape blade has a flat width less than 27.94 mm and a curved height greater than 6.3 mm. Another embodiment relates to a tape blade including a flat width of 30 mm or less, a curved width, wherein the curved width is less than the flat width and a standout distance of at least 132 inches. The flat width is used as a baseline dimension to define ratios for curved width and curved height.The lateral dimension of the tape blade or its metal core when pressed into a non-curved, planar state.
Standout distance
(Claim 1, Claim 5, Claim 9)
Applicant has determined that by shaping the tape blade to a relatively aggressive or steep curved profile shape, tape standout can be increased and tape droop can be decreased greatly. The steep curved profile shape increases rigidity and buckle resistance, and in particular, tape standout is greatly increased by locating this curved profile shape within the zone where buckling tends to occur. In a specific embodiment, the tape blade has a flat width less than 27.94 mm and has standout of greater than 115 inches.The maximum horizontal length the tape blade can be extended from the housing without buckling or collapsing under its own weight.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
1:25-cv-04689Apr 29, 2025Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation V. Klein Tools, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10712142

Application Number
US16113695A
Filing Date
Aug 27, 2018
Publication Date
Jul 14, 2020
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents