Patent No. US10926218 (titled "Sorbents For The Oxidation And Removal Of Mercury") was filed by Birchtech Corp on Jul 11, 2019.
’218 is related to the field of removing mercury from flue gas, specifically flue gas produced by coal combustion. The background problem is that burning coal releases mercury into the atmosphere, which needs to be controlled. Existing methods, such as injecting activated carbon, are not fully effective, especially for elemental mercury, and can be expensive and create waste disposal issues.
The underlying idea behind ’218 is to enhance mercury capture by adding iodine or iodide salts to the coal before combustion or directly into the combustion chamber. This additive reacts with the activated carbon sorbent injected downstream, improving its ability to capture mercury from the flue gas. The key is to use a specific ratio of the iodine additive to the amount of sorbent injected.
The claims of ’218 focus on a method of separating mercury from mercury-containing gas produced by coal combustion. The method involves adding HI, an iodide salt, or a combination to the coal or combustion chamber, injecting activated carbon sorbent downstream, contacting the mercury with the sorbent, and separating the sorbent. A key element is the weight ratio of the iodine additive to the sorbent , which is specified as being between 1:100 and 30:100.
In practice, the iodine additive is introduced either with the coal before it enters the combustion chamber or directly into the combustion chamber itself. The activated carbon sorbent is then injected into the flue gas downstream. The iodine additive is believed to react with the activated carbon, creating a 'promoted sorbent' that is more effective at capturing mercury. The spent sorbent is then separated from the flue gas, typically using a baghouse or electrostatic precipitator.
The patent also describes a feedback mechanism where the mercury content of the cleaned flue gas is measured, and this measurement is used to adjust the injection rate of the sorbent or the amount of iodine additive used. This allows for optimization of the process based on real-time conditions. This approach differs from prior solutions by pre-treating the coal or combustion chamber with iodine, rather than relying solely on the properties of the injected activated carbon.
In the early 2000s when ’218 was filed, mercury removal from flue gas streams was typically implemented using sorbent injection, where fine particles of materials like activated carbon were introduced into the gas stream. At a time when hardware or software constraints made real-time monitoring and control of sorbent injection non-trivial, systems commonly relied on fixed sorbent-to-mercury ratios, which often resulted in inefficient sorbent usage and disposal challenges.
The examiner agreed with the applicant's description of how the amended claims are different from the existing prior art. The prior art does not describe or suggest using a weight ratio of HI or iodide salt added to the coal and/or combustion chamber, to an amount of injected sorbent is from about 1:100 to about 30:100, in combination with the other recited process steps. The examiner withdrew the outstanding double patenting and new matter rejections.
This patent contains 26 claims, with independent claims 1, 25, and 26 directed to methods of separating or reducing mercury from a mercury-containing gas produced by coal combustion with added HI or iodide salt. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the conditions, components, and parameters of the methods described in the independent claims.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents