Patent No. US10945530 (titled "Chair With Appendage Accommodations") was filed by Buzz Seating Inc on Aug 27, 2019.
’530 is related to the field of seating, specifically chairs designed to accommodate individuals wearing bulky equipment such as duty belts with tools or weaponry. The background acknowledges that standard chairs often fail to provide adequate space and support for users with such equipment, leading to discomfort, potential injury, damage to the chair, or even security risks if weaponry needs to be removed.
The underlying idea behind ’530 is to create a chair that provides ample clearance and support for individuals wearing duty belts or similar equipment. This is achieved through a combination of features, most notably adjustable armrests that can be retracted to increase side clearance, and a tapered back and seat design that provides additional space at the rear of the chair.
The claims of ’530 focus on a chair featuring a back member that tapers from top to bottom, attached to a seat that also tapers from front to rear. Crucially, the chair includes two arm brackets on opposing sides of the seat, each with a retraction mechanism allowing it to move downward and rearward from an upright position. The claims also cover a base with legs and casters, and in some claims, specify adjustment levers for seat height, tilt, and forward/backward positioning.
In practice, the chair allows a user wearing a duty belt to sit comfortably without the belt interfering with the armrests or the back of the chair. The armrests can be retracted to provide more space for the belt and its contents, while the tapered back and seat create a wider opening at the rear, preventing the belt from being compressed or causing discomfort. The height and tilt adjustments further enhance user comfort and ergonomics.
The key differentiation from prior chair designs lies in the combination of the retractable armrests and the tapered back and seat. While adjustable armrests are not entirely novel, their integration with the tapered design specifically addresses the needs of individuals wearing bulky equipment. This combination provides a more comprehensive solution for accommodating duty belts and similar gear, reducing the need to remove equipment or compromise on comfort and safety.
In the late 2010s when ’530 was filed, chairs were typically implemented using a variety of materials and ergonomic designs, when systems commonly relied on mechanical adjustment mechanisms rather than sophisticated electronic controls, and when hardware or software constraints made complex automated adjustments non-trivial.
Claims 2-21 were pending. Claims 2-21 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite. Claims 2-3, 7, and 14-21 were rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting. Claims 2-4, 7, and 18-19 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over prior art. Claims 8 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), 2nd paragraph, and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prosecution record does NOT describe the technical reasoning or specific claim changes that led to allowance.
This patent contains 7 claims, with claims 1 and 7 being independent. The independent claims are directed to a chair with adjustable arm brackets and a tapered back and seat. The dependent claims generally add further details and limitations to the features described in the independent claims, such as clearance, cushions, and retraction angles.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents