Methods And Apparatuses Of Determining Quasi Co-Location (Qcl) Assumptions For Beam Operations

Patent No. US11057896 (titled "Methods And Apparatuses Of Determining Quasi Co-Location (Qcl) Assumptions For Beam Operations") was filed by Hannibal Ip Llc on Oct 22, 2019.

What is this patent about?

’896 is related to the field of wireless communication systems, specifically addressing beamforming techniques in 5G New Radio (NR) networks. Beamforming allows a User Equipment (UE) to focus its signal transmission or reception in a particular direction, improving signal strength and reducing interference. This is achieved by applying spatial domain filters based on Quasi Co-Location (QCL) assumptions. However, when a UE is configured with multiple Control Resource Sets (CORESETs), ambiguities arise in determining the appropriate QCL assumption for beam operations, potentially leading to unfavorable beam switching.

The underlying idea behind ’896 is to resolve ambiguities in QCL assumptions when a UE monitors multiple CORESETs. The key inventive insight is to prioritize the CORESET with the lowest CORESET Identity (ID) for determining the QCL assumption, especially when receiving aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS) or when a scheduling offset between a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) and a Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) is below a certain threshold. This ensures a more consistent and predictable beamforming behavior, avoiding unnecessary beam switches.

The claims of ’896 focus on a UE configured to monitor multiple CORESETs within an active Bandwidth Part (BWP) of a serving cell. Specifically, the UE applies the QCL assumption associated with the CORESET having the lowest ID to receive an aperiodic CSI-RS. Furthermore, when a PDSCH is scheduled by a PDCCH with a short scheduling offset, the UE applies the QCL assumption used for receiving the PDCCH to also receive the PDSCH, again prioritizing the CORESET with the lowest ID.

In practice, the invention ensures that the UE consistently uses the beam associated with the lowest CORESET ID when receiving aperiodic CSI-RS or PDSCH scheduled with a short offset. This is particularly relevant when multiple CORESETs overlap in time, potentially having different QCL assumptions. By consistently using the lowest CORESET ID, the UE avoids rapid beam switching, which can degrade performance. The invention also addresses scenarios where some CORESETs are not actively monitored, providing rules for how the UE should handle QCL assumptions in such cases.

This approach differs from prior solutions by providing a clear and unambiguous rule for selecting the QCL assumption when multiple CORESETs are configured. Previous systems might have left the UE to determine the QCL assumption based on less deterministic factors, leading to inconsistent behavior and potential performance degradation. By prioritizing the CORESET with the lowest ID, the invention provides a simple and effective mechanism for ensuring consistent beamforming, especially in scenarios with overlapping CORESETs and short scheduling offsets, thereby improving the overall reliability and efficiency of the wireless communication system.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical landscape at the time

In the late 2010s when ’896 was filed, wireless communication systems at a time when beamforming technologies were being integrated into next-generation (e.g., 5G NR) systems, at a time when directional communications were being implemented using beam operations to switch beams for transmitting or receiving channels or resources, and at a time when each beam was considered a spatial domain filter determined by a corresponding Quasi Co-Location (QCL) assumption.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The examiner approved the application because the prior art, whether taken individually or in combination, did not sufficiently disclose or suggest monitoring at least one of several Control Resource Sets (CORESETs) configured for a User Equipment (UE) within an active Bandwidth Part (BWP) of a serving cell in a time slot. Furthermore, the prior art failed to teach applying a first Quasi Co-Location (QCL) assumption of a first CORESET from a set of monitored CORESETs to receive an aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS), where the first CORESET is associated with a monitored search space configured with the lowest CORESET Identity (ID) among the monitored CORESETs, in combination with other claim limitations.

Claims

This patent contains 19 claims, of which claims 1, 10, and 11 are independent. The independent claims focus on a user equipment monitoring Control Resource Sets (CORESETs) and applying Quasi Co-Location (QCL) assumptions for receiving aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signals (CSI-RS) or Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCH). The dependent claims generally elaborate on specific configurations, conditions, and steps related to the CORESETs, QCL assumptions, and the reception of CSI-RS or PDSCH.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Active Bandwidth Part
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 11)
“The at least one processor is configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to monitor at least one of multiple CORESETs configured for the UE within an active BWP of a serving cell in a time slot, and apply a first QCL assumption of a first CORESET of a set of one or more monitored CORESETs to receive an aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS).”A bandwidth part of a serving cell that is active for a UE in a time slot.
Aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signal
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
“The at least one processor is configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to monitor at least one of multiple CORESETs configured for the UE within an active BWP of a serving cell in a time slot, and apply a first QCL assumption of a first CORESET of a set of one or more monitored CORESETs to receive an aperiodic Channel Status Information-Reference Signal (CSI-RS).”A channel status information reference signal that is not transmitted periodically.
Control Resource Sets
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 11)
“However, current specifications for the next generation wireless communication system may cause a UE to perform unfavorable beam switching when the UE is configured with multiple Control Resource Sets (CORESETs). In addition, although the next generation wireless communication system enables utilizing a flexible resource allocation scheme, a UE is likely unable to decide which QCL assumption to use due to the ambiguity of the current specifications for the next generation wireless communication system.”A set of control resources configured for a UE.
Lowest CORESET Identity
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 11)
“The first CORESET may be associated with a monitored search space configured with a lowest CORESET Identity (ID) among the set of one or more monitored CORESETs.”The smallest numerical identifier assigned to a CORESET.
Quasi Co-Location
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 11)
“Each beam the UE applies may be considered as a spatial domain filter that is determined by a corresponding QCL assumption. The present disclosure is directed to methods and apparatuses for determining QCL assumptions.”An assumption related to spatial domain filtering for beam operations.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
4:25-cv-00200Feb 27, 2025Hannibal IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Date

    Description

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US11057896

HANNIBAL IP LLC
Application Number
US16660726
Filing Date
Oct 22, 2019
Status
Granted
Expiry Date
Dec 10, 2039
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents