Play Control Of Content On A Display Device

Patent No. US11086934 (titled "Play Control Of Content On A Display Device") was filed by Touchstream Technologies Inc on Jun 30, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’934 is related to the field of controlling media playback on a display device, such as a television, using a separate computing device like a smartphone. Traditionally, watching web media on a TV involved connecting a computer, which was cumbersome to control from a distance. Existing wireless controllers and web browsers on TVs also presented usability issues and interfered with normal TV viewing.

The underlying idea behind ’934 is to use a personal computing device to remotely control media playback on a display device, even when different media types require different player applications. The system establishes an association between the two devices using a unique identifier , allowing the personal device to send commands to the display device through a server. The server handles the translation of commands into a format compatible with the specific media player being used.

The claims of ’934 focus on a media receiver (e.g., a smart TV) that provides a unique identifier to a computing device (e.g., a smartphone). The media receiver then receives messages from the computing device, referencing content and including commands. The receiver selects the appropriate media player based on the content type and controls playback using the received commands, which have been converted from a universal format to a player-specific format.

In practice, the user initiates content selection and playback commands on their personal computing device. This device sends a message to a server, which verifies the user and target device. The server then uses a universal API adapter to translate the user's commands into the specific commands recognized by the media player on the display device. This allows the user to control various media players (e.g., YouTube, Ted.com) through a single interface.

This system differentiates itself from prior approaches by providing a seamless way to control diverse media content on a display device from a separate computing device. The use of a unique identifier and a server-side API adapter allows for a flexible and user-friendly experience, eliminating the need for complex configurations or direct connections between the devices. The system also supports scenarios with multiple users and devices, enabling collaborative viewing experiences.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical landscape at the time

In the early 2010s when ’934 was filed, web media was often played on computers rather than television displays, even though connecting a computer to a television set was known. At a time when X was typically implemented using Y, it was difficult to control such a system within the typical scenario for television watching where the viewer is positioned some distance from the television. Furthermore, when systems commonly relied on Z rather than A, although a wireless device could enable the user to control the television from a distance, it could be difficult to view a web browser display on the television set and may interfere with normal television program viewing by other persons.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The examiner approved the application because the prior art, individually or in combination, did not disclose all elements of independent claim 1. Specifically, the prior art failed to show receiving a set of messages from another computing device based on a unique identifier, where the messages reference content associated with a specific media player type from a set of available types, and include commands for that player. The prior art also failed to show selecting the media player based on its association with the referenced content and controlling the content playback using the received commands.

Claims

This patent includes 20 claims, with independent claims 1, 8, and 17. The independent claims are generally directed to controlling media playback by selecting a media application based on content and using commands to control the application. The dependent claims generally add detail or limitations to the independent claims.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Media playing application
(Claim 1, Claim 8, Claim 17)
“The server system is operable, in response to receiving the first message from the personal computing device, to provide to the display device a second message identifying the user-selected content and the media player to play the content. In response to receiving the second message, the display device is operable to obtain a first media player needed to play the content, to load the media player and to present the content on the display.”A software application capable of playing a specific type of media content.
Piece of content
(Claim 1, Claim 8, Claim 17)
“For example, according to one aspect, a system for presenting and controlling content on a display device includes a network, a server system coupled to the network and comprising one or more servers, a display device coupled to the network and having a display, and a personal computing device operable to transmit a first message according to a specified format over the network to the server system. The server system stores an association between the personal computing device and the display device. The first message identifies user-selected content and a media player to play the content.”A media item, such as a video or audio file, that is to be played on a display device.
Set of commands
(Claim 1, Claim 8, Claim 17)
“In some implementations, the personal computing device is operable to transmit a message according to a specified format over the network to the server system. The message can include a command for controlling playing of the content on the display device. The server system is operable, in response to receiving the message, to convert the command into a corresponding command recognizable by the media player if the command received from the personal computing device is not recognizable by the media player. The server system is operable to provide to the display device a message that includes the corresponding command, and the display device is operable, in response to receiving the message from the server system, to execute the command.”Instructions for controlling the playback of content within a media playing application.
Unique identifier
(Claim 1, Claim 8, Claim 17)
“In some implementations, the server system stores a look-up table that includes a synchronization code uniquely associated with the display device. A message from the personal computing device can include the synchronization code, and in response to receiving the message from personal computing device, the server system can use the synchronization code and the look-up table to identify the display device on which the content is to be played. The synchronization code can be different from an IP address associated with the display device and/or a media access control address associated with the display device.”A value that distinguishes a computing device or media receiver from others, used for routing messages.
Universal format
(Claim 8, Claim 17)
“In some implementations, the personal computing device is operable to transmit a message according to a specified format over the network to the server system. The message can include a command for controlling playing of the content on the display device. The server system is operable, in response to receiving the message, to convert the command into a corresponding command recognizable by the media player if the command received from the personal computing device is not recognizable by the media player. The server system is operable to provide to the display device a message that includes the corresponding command, and the display device is operable, in response to receiving the message from the server system, to execute the command.”A standardized command structure defined by the computing device, which is converted to a format specific to the media playing application.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:25-cv-00753Aug 1, 2025Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Co. Ltd. et al

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Date

    Description

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US11086934

TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES INC
Application Number
US16917095
Filing Date
Jun 30, 2020
Status
Granted
Expiry Date
Jun 10, 2031
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents