Patent No. US11119474 (titled "Method, Device, And System For Redundancy Control") was filed by Sz Dji Technology Co Ltd on Feb 6, 2019.
’474 is related to the field of control systems for movable objects, particularly unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Current UAV control systems face safety issues when the remote control connection becomes unreliable, potentially leading to an out-of-control state. This patent addresses the need for redundancy in remote control to mitigate such risks.
The underlying idea behind ’474 is to provide a backup control mechanism for a movable object, such as a drone, by utilizing multiple remote control devices and receivers. The system is designed to switch between these control sources if the primary connection fails. This fail-safe mechanism ensures continued control and prevents accidents.
The claims of ’474 focus on a method and a device that receive control signals from multiple remote controls and select one of these signals to control a movable object. Specifically, the independent claims cover receiving a first control signal from a first remote control via a first receiver, receiving a second control signal from a second remote control via a second receiver, and then selecting one of these signals for controlling the movement of the object.
In practice, the invention involves a flight controller on the UAV that is connected to multiple receivers, each paired with a separate remote control. The flight controller continuously monitors the connection quality of the primary remote control. If the connection is deemed abnormal (e.g., signal loss), the system automatically switches to a backup remote control, ensuring seamless control. The selection process can be based on priority, signal strength, or other predefined criteria.
This approach differs from traditional single remote control systems by introducing a redundant control pathway . Instead of relying on a single point of failure, the system can dynamically adapt to connection issues by switching to an alternative control source. This significantly enhances the reliability and safety of operating movable objects, especially in scenarios where a stable connection is critical.
In the mid-2010s when ’474 was filed, UAVs were becoming increasingly prevalent at a time when remote control was typically implemented using dedicated radio frequency links, and when redundancy in control systems commonly relied on simple failover mechanisms rather than sophisticated signal selection algorithms, and when hardware or software constraints made real-time signal processing for robust control non-trivial.
The claims were rejected in a non-final office action. The claims were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al., US pg. Pub. No. (2017/0045892). The prosecution record does NOT describe the technical reasoning or specific claim changes that led to allowance.
This patent contains 20 claims, with independent claims 1 and 19. The independent claims are directed to a method and a device for selecting between control signals from multiple remote control devices to control a movable object. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and refine the method of independent claim 1 and the device of independent claim 19.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents