System and method for securing and removing over-locks

Patent No. US11232513 (titled "System and method for securing and removing over-locks") on Jan 18, 2021. The application was issued on Jan 25, 2022.

What is this patent about?

’513 is related to the field of remote access management and automated security systems for rentable facilities. Specifically, it addresses the logistical challenges of managing physical over-locks in environments like self-storage facilities, where units must be secured due to tenant delinquency or vacancy. Traditional methods require manual intervention by staff to place or remove locks, creating operational bottlenecks and delaying access for customers who have recently settled their accounts.

The underlying idea behind ’513 is to bridge the gap between purely mechanical security hardware and modern digital management platforms. By using a mapping architecture that links a non-electronic combination lock to a specific location and a digital user account, the system can automate the release of access codes. The core insight is that the lock itself does not need to be smart or connected to the internet; instead, the intelligence resides in a cloud-based coordination between a lock management database and a property management system.

The claims of ’513 focus on a method for retrieving unlock codes through the interaction of two separate and distinct software systems. The process involves securing a location with a mechanical over-lock that lacks electronic communication capabilities and mapping that lock’s identifier to a specific location within a management database. The independent claims specifically protect the use of an application programming interface (API) to synchronize data between a lock management system and an access management system to verify user credentials and trigger the electronic delivery of the unlock code.

In practice, when a customer pays their balance or rents a new unit, they access a digital portal to request entry. The system verifies their status by passing credentials through the API between the disparate servers. Once the access management system confirms the account is in good standing, the corresponding unlock code is retrieved from the mapping table and transmitted to the user’s mobile device. This allows the user to manually enter the combination and remove the lock without any facility personnel being present on-site.

This approach differs from prior solutions by eliminating the need for expensive, power-hungry electronic locks or smart hardware at the unit door. By utilizing mechanical combination locks as the physical barrier, the system avoids the high capital costs and maintenance issues associated with motorized locking mechanisms. Furthermore, it solves the security flaw of static combinations by managing the association of codes and identifiers centrally, ensuring that access is only granted through a verified, real-time digital handshake.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2010s when ’513 was filed, facility management and access control were typically implemented using either manual mechanical locks or hardwired electronic security systems. At a time when facility operators commonly relied on physical staff presence to manage unit access and delinquency enforcement, the deployment of automated locking mechanisms often required significant capital improvements, such as installing interior-mounted electronic strikes or persistent power infrastructure. Hardware and software constraints made the real-time synchronization of payment processing with physical lock state non-trivial, as systems generally functioned as isolated silos where financial databases and physical access hardware operated on disparate networks without a unified mobile interface for end-user self-service.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the integration of a distributed management architecture that bridges remote financial account status with physical access control via a mobile-mediated verification loop. The architectural shift involves utilizing a remote server to dynamically validate customer account identifiers against delinquency statuses in a database to gate the transmission of unlock codes for physical combination locks. This configuration enables a specific technical capability: the automated, self-service removal of over-locks without human intervention or the need for high-power, permanently installed electronic locking hardware. By leveraging an encryption-based association between locks and codes and delivering these codes through a transceiver to a mobile interface, the system overcomes the technical constraints of manual lock management and the high infrastructure costs of traditional automated access systems.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 20 claims, with claims 1, 9, and 16 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a method for retrieving an unlock code for a non-electronic over-lock by mapping a location to a lock identifier within a lock management system and utilizing an application programming interface to transmit the code to a user through a separate access management system. The dependent claims serve to further define specific delivery formats for the electronic message, identify various types of lock identifiers and generation methods, and detail the integration of user portals, credential verification, and payment prompts within the retrieval process.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Access management system
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 16)
The system comprises a mobile device communicatively coupled to a server, wherein the mobile device is configured to transmit a customer account identifier to the server. The transceiver is configured to transmit the unlock code to the mobile device if the processor determines that the customer account does not have a delinquent status.A server-based system separate from the lock management system that handles user verification and the electronic delivery of unlock codes to the user.
Application programming interface (API)
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 16)
The system includes transmitting the unlock code to an access management system from the lock management system via an application programming interface (API). This allows the two separate and distinct systems that operate on different servers to communicate.The technical interface used to facilitate data transmission, such as unlock codes and user credentials, between the separate lock management and access management systems.
Lock management system
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 16)
The system comprises a database stored at the remote server configured to store a lock identifier and an unlock code. The lock management system and the access management system are two separate and distinct systems that operate on different servers.A server-based system distinct from the access management system that stores lock identifiers and their associated unlock codes and maps them to specific physical locations.
Not capable of electronic communication
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 16)
Other conventional over-locks include standard combination locks. The system allows or disallows access to an over-locked storage unit without the need for an on-site attendant or conventional electronic over-lock systems that require constant power and significant capital improvements.A characteristic of the physical lock indicating it lacks internal circuitry for remote or automated electronic unlocking, wireless data transmission, or network connectivity.
Over-lock
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 16)
Self-storage facility owners typically place an over-lock over the storage unit door, such as through a hasp that prevents opening of the door. The over-lock is utilized until the customer pays the delinquent past due balance on their account. Other conventional over-locks include standard combination locks.A physical security device, such as a combination lock, used to secure a rentable facility (e.g., a self-storage unit) to prevent access by a customer, typically due to account delinquency or vacancy.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:23-cv-00343Mar 17, 2023Davinci Lock, Llc V. Spiderdoor, Llc

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US11232513

Application Number
US17151609A
Filing Date
Jan 18, 2021
Publication Date
Jan 25, 2022
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents