System And Method For Controlling Rotorcraft

Patent No. US11247782 (titled "System And Method For Controlling Rotorcraft") was filed by Textron Innovations Inc on Sep 21, 2018.

What is this patent about?

’782 is related to the field of rotorcraft flight control systems, specifically addressing engine management during engine failure scenarios. Modern rotorcraft often employ multiple engines for redundancy, ensuring continued operation even if one engine fails. The challenge lies in rapidly and safely increasing the output of the remaining engine(s) to compensate for the lost power, while avoiding potentially damaging over-torque or over-temperature conditions.

The underlying idea behind ’782 is to dynamically adjust the rate at which the remaining engine's power is increased following an engine failure. This is achieved by monitoring an operating parameter (like torque, speed, or temperature) of the functioning engine and comparing it to a nominal limit . The difference between the operating parameter and the limit determines the 'headroom' available, which is then used to calculate an appropriate 'ramping rate' for increasing the engine's output.

The claims of ’782 focus on a method, a rotorcraft, and a flight control computer that, upon detecting an engine outage, receive an operating parameter from a remaining engine, determine an engine output ramping rate based on the difference between that parameter and a nominal limit, and then increase the output of the remaining engine according to that ramping rate. Crucially, the ramping rate has at least two rates of increase, a first rate when the difference between the operating parameter and the nominal limit is less than a predetermined value, and a second, greater rate when the difference is greater than the predetermined value.

In practice, the flight control computer continuously monitors the operating parameters of the engines. When an engine fails, the computer immediately assesses the headroom available in the remaining engine. If the remaining engine is already operating near its limit, the output is increased gradually to avoid exceeding operational limits. However, if the remaining engine has significant headroom, the output is increased more rapidly to quickly restore the rotorcraft's performance.

This approach differs from prior solutions that might use a fixed ramping rate or a simple step increase in power. By dynamically adjusting the ramping rate based on real-time engine conditions, ’782 allows for a more responsive and safer transition to single-engine operation. This prevents potentially damaging overshoots while maximizing the available power from the remaining engine, improving the rotorcraft's ability to maintain altitude and maneuverability after an engine failure. The use of a lookup table or runtime calculation allows for flexible implementation of the ramping rate determination.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical landscape at the time

In the late 2010s when ’782 was filed, rotorcraft flight control systems were at a time when fly-by-wire systems were being implemented to assist pilots in stably flying the rotorcraft and to reduce workload on the pilots. These systems commonly relied on flight control computers disposed between the pilot controls and flight control systems, providing corrections to flight controls that assist in operating the rotorcraft more efficiently or that put the rotorcraft into a stable flight mode while still allowing the pilot to override the FBW control inputs. At this time, it was typical to use multiple engines in rotorcraft, and hardware or software constraints made it non-trivial to quickly and safely adjust engine output in response to an engine failure.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The examiner allowed the claims because Lescher discloses detecting and reacting to a second helicopter engine failure, including a rotorcraft with multiple engines and a flight control computer. Hedrick discloses a precision auto throttle for engine performance adjustment, including retarding the throttle rate if output exceeds a limit. Royer discloses an instantaneous throttle control system that increases flow rate when a lower value is inputted. The examiner stated that it would have been obvious to combine the multiple output throttle rates based on an output limit of Hedrick with the one engine inoperative system of Lescher to return control to the aircraft in an emergency without overloading the system.

Claims

This patent includes 21 claims, with independent claims 1, 11, and 21. The independent claims are directed to a method, a rotorcraft, and a flight control computer, respectively, all relating to managing engine output after detecting an engine outage. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the specifics of the method and the components of the rotorcraft and flight control computer, further defining how the engine output is increased and how the engine output ramping rate is determined.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Engine output ramping rate
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21)
“In an embodiment, a method includes: receiving an operating parameter of a first engine of a rotorcraft; determining an engine output ramping rate for the first engine according to a difference between the operating parameter of the first engine and a nominal limit of the first engine; and increasing the output of the first engine in response to detecting an outage of another engine of the rotorcraft, the output of the first engine being increased according to the engine output ramping rate.”The rate at which the output of an engine is increased, determined based on the difference between the engine's operating parameter and its nominal limit. The rate varies depending on whether the difference is above or below a predetermined value.
First rate of increase
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21)
“The engine output ramping rate having a first rate of increase when the difference between the operating parameter of the second engine and the nominal limit of the second engine is less than a predetermined value, the engine output ramping rate having a second rate of increase when the difference between the operating parameter of the second engine and the nominal limit of the second engine is greater than the predetermined value, the second rate of increase being greater than the first rate of increase”A slower rate at which the engine output is increased when the difference between the operating parameter and the nominal limit is less than a predetermined value.
Nominal limit
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21)
“In an embodiment, a method includes: receiving an operating parameter of a first engine of a rotorcraft; determining an engine output ramping rate for the first engine according to a difference between the operating parameter of the first engine and a nominal limit of the first engine; and increasing the output of the first engine in response to detecting an outage of another engine of the rotorcraft, the output of the first engine being increased according to the engine output ramping rate.”A predefined threshold for an engine's operating parameter, used in determining the engine output ramping rate.
Operating parameter
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21)
“In an embodiment, a method includes: receiving an operating parameter of a first engine of a rotorcraft; determining an engine output ramping rate for the first engine according to a difference between the operating parameter of the first engine and a nominal limit of the first engine; and increasing the output of the first engine in response to detecting an outage of another engine of the rotorcraft, the output of the first engine being increased according to the engine output ramping rate.”A measurable value associated with an engine's operation, used to determine the engine output ramping rate.
Second rate of increase
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21)
“The engine output ramping rate having a first rate of increase when the difference between the operating parameter of the second engine and the nominal limit of the second engine is less than a predetermined value, the engine output ramping rate having a second rate of increase when the difference between the operating parameter of the second engine and the nominal limit of the second engine is greater than the predetermined value, the second rate of increase being greater than the first rate of increase”A faster rate at which the engine output is increased when the difference between the operating parameter and the nominal limit is greater than a predetermined value.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
1:25-cv-00435Apr 8, 2025Avadel Cns Pharmaceuticals, Llc V. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:25-cv-00405Apr 1, 2025Avadel Cns Pharmaceuticals, Llc V. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:25-cv-00221Feb 25, 2025Avadel CNS Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
1:25-cv-00196Feb 18, 2025Avadel Cns Pharmaceuticals, Llc V. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:25-cv-00057Jan 14, 2025Avadel Cns Pharmaceuticals, Llc V. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Date

    Description

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US11247782

TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
Application Number
US16138053
Filing Date
Sep 21, 2018
Status
Granted
Expiry Date
May 30, 2039
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents