Patent No. US11263607 (titled "Watch Skins Selection Application With Blockchain Token") was filed by Watch Skins Corp on Mar 16, 2021.
’607 is related to the field of electronic watches, specifically addressing the issue of scarcity and authentication of digital watch faces. Traditional electronic watch faces can be easily copied and distributed without any means of verifying authenticity or ownership. This patent aims to solve this problem by associating each watch face with a unique cryptographic token.
The underlying idea behind ’607 is to use blockchain technology to create a system where digital watch faces are treated as unique, non-fungible assets. Each watch face is linked to a cryptographic token, and only the owner of that token is authorized to display the corresponding watch face on their device. This creates scarcity and allows for verifiable ownership, similar to physical luxury goods.
The claims of ’607 focus on an electronic watch system that includes a watch display and one or more processors. The processors are programmed to receive a user's request to display a watch face, then verify if the user's blockchain wallet holds the cryptographic token associated with that watch face. If the verification is successful, the watch face is displayed; otherwise, the display is prevented, ensuring only authorized users can access specific watch faces.
In practice, a user would acquire a digital watch face, which is essentially a design file, and a corresponding non-fungible token (NFT) . The NFT acts as a digital certificate of ownership, stored in the user's blockchain wallet. When the user selects a watch face, the watch checks the blockchain to confirm that the user's wallet contains the correct NFT. This verification process ensures that only legitimate owners can display the watch face.
This approach differs significantly from prior methods where watch faces could be freely copied and distributed. By leveraging blockchain technology, ’607 introduces a mechanism for creating digital scarcity and verifiable ownership, enabling new business models for digital watch face designers and providing users with a sense of exclusivity and authenticity. The system also allows for a secondary market where users can buy, sell, and trade watch faces, similar to physical collectibles.
In the late 2010s when ’607 was filed, electronic watches were becoming increasingly sophisticated, at a time when user interfaces were typically implemented using touchscreens and customizable software. Systems commonly relied on wireless communication protocols to connect watches to smartphones or other devices, and when hardware or software constraints made secure authentication and digital rights management non-trivial.
The examiner allowed the claims because the closest prior art, Wilson, discloses configuring context-specific user interfaces for portable multifunction devices, but fails to teach or suggest, in combination with Vijayan, an electronic watch system comprising a processor, storing a cryptographic code associated with the information for displaying on the display face, and the processor controlling the information to be displayed on the display face responsive to the cryptographic code associated with the information for displaying on the display face indicating exclusive ownership of the information to be displayed on the display face, and the processor controlling the information and not allowing the information to be displayed on the display face responsive to the cryptographic code associated with the information for displaying on the display face not indicating exclusive ownership of the information to be displayed on the display face. Claims 2-6, 8-9 are dependent on claim 1 and are allowable for the same reasons stated above. In addition, claim 11 is analogous to claim 1, and thus is allowable for the same reasons stated above. Claims 12-16, 18-19 are dependent on claim 11 and are allowable for the same reasons stated above.
This patent contains 16 claims, with independent claims 1 and 9. The independent claims are directed to an electronic watch system and a method of displaying a watch face, respectively, both involving blockchain verification of ownership. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the features and functionalities of the watch system and method described in the independent claims.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents