Patent No. US11279658 (titled "Compositions For Improved Concrete Performance") was filed by E5 Inc on Mar 8, 2019.
’658 is related to the field of concrete preparation, specifically addressing the challenges of achieving optimal compressive strength and minimizing defects like cracking, curling, and shrinkage during the curing process. Traditional concrete mixing involves a delicate balance of water content to ensure both workability and proper hydration, but excess water can lead to structural weaknesses. The use of silica additives to improve concrete properties is known, but often increases water demand, exacerbating the problem of capillary and void formation.
The underlying idea behind ’658 is to introduce nanosilica particles with a high surface area into the concrete mix *after* the initial wetting of the dry cement and aggregate components. This delayed addition, in contrast to conventional methods where silica is added earlier, surprisingly reduces water loss during curing, leading to improved workability, reduced defects, and enhanced compressive strength. The key insight is that the timing of nanosilica addition significantly impacts its effectiveness in controlling water retention and promoting complete hydration.
The claims of ’658 focus on a process for preparing concrete installations. This process involves combining a dry cement mix, water, nanosilica particles (0.1 to 7.0 ounces per hundredweight of cement, with a particle size of 1-55 nm and/or a surface area of 300-900 m²/g), and aggregate/sand (400-700 wt % bwoc). The water is added either in its entirety after which the mix is agitated for a time t a prior to the addition of the amorphous silica, after which the concrete mix is then agitated for a time t b ; or in portions, with the nanosilica added after an initial portion of water has been mixed with the cement and aggregate/sand. The claims specify various mixing times (t 11 , t 12 , t 13 , t 21 , t 22 , t 23 , t 31 , t 32 , t a , t b ) for different addition sequences, followed by pouring the concrete mix to form the installation.
In practice, the process involves first mixing the dry cement, aggregate, and a portion of the water (or all of it) in a Ready-mix or similar mixer. After a period of agitation to ensure the dry components are thoroughly wetted, the nanosilica, often in the form of a colloidal suspension, is added. A final mixing stage ensures the nanosilica is evenly distributed throughout the concrete. This delayed addition is crucial; adding the nanosilica before or during the initial wetting can compromise the concrete's workability and increase the likelihood of defects. The resulting concrete exhibits improved water retention, allowing for more complete hydration and a denser, stronger final product.
This approach differentiates itself from prior art by recognizing the importance of the *timing* of nanosilica addition. While silica has been used in concrete for some time, the conventional wisdom was that it could be added at any point during the mixing process. ’658 demonstrates that adding nanosilica *after* the initial wetting of the dry components leads to significantly better results. This is believed to be due to the nanosilica's ability to immobilize water and prevent its premature evaporation, promoting more complete hydration and reducing the formation of capillaries and voids. The result is a concrete that is more durable, resistant to cracking and shrinkage, and possesses a higher compressive strength, even under adverse environmental conditions.
In the late 2010s when ’658 was filed, concrete compositions at a time when water management during curing was a critical factor affecting the final strength and durability of the material. At a time when silica fume was commonly used to improve water impermeability and compressive strength, but at the cost of increased water demand, when systems commonly relied on careful water rationing to avoid bleedwater and compromised rheology, and when hardware or software constraints made precise control of mixing parameters non-trivial.
The examiner approved the application because the prior art failed to teach or suggest all the limitations of the independent claim. The closest prior art was the applicant's co-pending application, but the submission of a terminal disclaimer overcame any question of obviousness-type double patenting.
This patent contains 10 claims, with claim 1 being the only independent claim. Independent claim 1 is directed to a process for preparing a concrete installation involving specific steps of creating a concrete mix with particular components and mixing procedures. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and refine the elements and limitations of the independent claim, providing more specific details regarding the water content, silica composition, mixing methods, and applications of the concrete.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents