Patent No. US11357143 (titled "Protective Material Applicator Device") was filed by Superior Communications Inc on Feb 3, 2020.
’143 is related to the field of applying protective films to electronic devices, specifically addressing the problem of air bubbles and the waiting time associated with wet application methods. The background acknowledges the widespread use of electronic devices with touch-based screens and the need to protect them from damage, highlighting the drawbacks of existing film protectors that require messy wet solutions and long drying times.
The underlying idea behind ’143 is to use a mechanical applicator to apply a protective film to a device screen, simultaneously removing the film's backing and smoothing out any air bubbles. This eliminates the need for wet solutions and reduces the waiting time for the film to fully adhere. The core insight is to integrate the film application and bubble removal into a single, streamlined process.
The claims of ’143 focus on a method involving a body or apparatus with a defined area for receiving a mobile device. The method includes inserting the mobile device into this area, providing a screen protector attached to a tab, separating the backing layer from the application layer while the application layer remains attached to the tab, and applying the application layer to the screen of the mobile device while it is positioned in the area and the application layer remains attached to the tab.
In practice, the invention uses a roller or similar device to press the protective film onto the screen as the backing is peeled away. This simultaneous action ensures a smooth, bubble-free application. Some embodiments incorporate a splitter to aid in separating the backing from the film, and a guide to ensure precise alignment. The device can also function as a stand for the electronic device after the film has been applied.
The differentiation from prior approaches lies in the dry application method and the integrated functionality of the applicator. Traditional methods often rely on wet solutions and manual squeegeeing, which can be messy and time-consuming. ’143 offers a cleaner, faster, and more convenient solution by combining the film application and bubble removal steps into a single, mechanically assisted process, and by providing a reusable device that can also serve as a stand.
In the early 2010s when ’143 was filed, electronic devices with touch-based screens were gaining popularity, and consumers sought ways to protect them. At a time when protective films were typically applied using wet fluid solutions, users commonly encountered issues such as trapped air bubbles and long drying times. Hardware or software constraints made it non-trivial to apply these films effectively without waiting for them to dry or for the air bubbles to disappear.
The examiner approved the claims because the prior art did not teach or suggest the specific combination of features recited in claims 15 and 25. Specifically, the prior art failed to disclose an application or protective layer sandwiched between a backing layer and a tab, where separating the backing layer from the application or protective layer occurs while the application or protective layer remains attached to the tab, and applying the application or protective layer to the surface or screen while the mobile device is in the area and the application or protective layer remains attached to the tab. The closest prior art, Abbondanzio, teaches applying a screen protector but does not disclose the application layer being sandwiched between the backing layer and the tab.
This patent contains 20 claims, of which claims 1 and 11 are independent. The independent claims are directed to methods for applying a screen protector or protective layer to a mobile device using an apparatus and a tabbed screen protector. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the steps and features described in the independent claims, adding details such as alignment, application methods, coverage area, tab separation, and cavity dimensions.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents