System And Method For Card Control

Patent No. US11556936 (titled "System And Method For Card Control") was filed by Wells Fargo Bank Na on Apr 25, 2017.

What is this patent about?

’936 is related to the field of payment card fraud prevention . Specifically, it concerns systems and methods for controlling payment card usage by leveraging user demographics, transaction history, and location data to proactively identify and prevent unauthorized transactions. The background acknowledges the increasing prevalence of payment card fraud and the limitations of existing fraud prevention mechanisms.

The underlying idea behind ’936 is to create a dynamic card control system that automatically generates and enforces card control rules based on a user's profile and behavior, as well as the behavior of similar users. This system allows users to customize these rules through a card control dashboard, providing them with greater control over their payment card usage and reducing the risk of fraudulent transactions. The system also uses location data to proactively alert users of potential restrictions.

The claims of ’936 focus on a card control computing system that receives demographic and transaction history data from electronic databases for both a user and a set of other users. The system analyzes this data to identify a subset of similar users and their card control rules. Based on this analysis, the system selects and proposes card control rules for the user's payment card. The system also generates new rules when it identifies out-of-pattern transactions. The user can then activate these rules through a card control dashboard. The system enforces these rules by analyzing transactions, receiving location data from the user's device, and denying transactions that violate the activated rules.

In practice, the system uses clustering analysis to group users with similar spending habits and demographics. This allows the system to identify unusual transaction patterns and proactively suggest card control rules to prevent fraud. For example, if a user attempts to make a purchase at a merchant that is rarely patronized by similar users, the system can generate a card control rule to restrict that transaction. The system also uses the user's location data to provide real-time alerts and prevent transactions at restricted locations.

This approach differs from traditional fraud prevention methods by being proactive and personalized. Instead of relying on after-the-fact detection, ’936 anticipates potential fraudulent activity based on user behavior and location. The card control dashboard empowers users to customize their card control rules, providing a more convenient and user-friendly experience compared to existing fraud prevention mechanisms that often require card cancellation and re-issuance. The use of location data adds an extra layer of security by alerting users to potential restrictions before they even attempt a transaction.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical landscape at the time

In the late 2010s when ’936 was filed, at a time when payment card fraud was a growing concern, systems commonly relied on centralized databases and rule-based engines for fraud detection. At that time, user interfaces for managing financial accounts were becoming increasingly sophisticated, with mobile applications and web-based dashboards being widely adopted. Furthermore, location-based services were becoming more prevalent, allowing for the integration of geographic data into transaction authorization processes.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The examiner allowed the claims because the prior art, including Kirsch, Poole, Salama, and Shrivastava, failed to disclose the specific combination of elements recited in the claims. Specifically, the prior art did not teach using demographic and transaction histories of a user and other users to select a first transaction rule specific to a merchant while also generating a second rule in response to a potential fraudulent transaction. Additionally, Shrivastava failed to teach receiving an indication of a transaction, generating a second rule based on the attempted transaction being determined to be an out-of-pattern transaction as a result of querying a database storing previous transaction histories of other users, and enforcing the rules by at least receiving a GPS location of a user device relative to the merchant to determine if the transaction violates the rules generated.

Claims

This patent includes 18 claims, with claims 1 and 10 being independent. The independent claims focus on a card control computing system and a method for controlling payment card transactions based on analysis of user demographic information and transaction histories, and comparison to other users. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and refine the features and functionalities described in the independent claims.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Card control dashboard
(Claim 1, Claim 10)
“The present disclosure relates to a card control computing system configured to create a card control dashboard for a user having at least one payment card issued by a financial institution. In some embodiments, the user may be provided with a card control dashboard (e.g., a tool within online banking, a tool within a mobile banking application, a tool within a mobile wallet application, a tool provided a dedicated card control application, or other arrangement) that allows the user to view all of the card control rules that have been created and that allows the user delete/edit parameters of the card control rule, as the user deems appropriate.”A user interface that presents card control rules to the user and allows the user to enable or disable them.
Card control rule
(Claim 1, Claim 10)
“For each payment card of the user, the card control computing system creates and stores a variety of card control rules. In various embodiments, the card control system creates the card control rules for the user automatically based on the transaction history of the user, demographic information about the user, transaction histories and/or card control rules of other user with similar transaction histories and demographics, and so on. The card control rules may pertain to merchant categories (e.g., using MCC codes) and/or to specific merchants. Based upon the card control rules, the card control computing system may allow or restrict payments made using each payment card.”A rule that restricts the use of a payment card based on various criteria, such as merchant category or specific merchants.
Database service
(Claim 1, Claim 10)
“Referring now to background to keep track of the card control rules in the card control dashboard 200, and monitors the user's transactions that may trigger card control rules. By using the card control rules, the card control computing system 105 prevents unauthorized use of the payment card pro-actively before unauthorized transactions take place and enables a user to be in control of how his/her payment card is used.”A service that provides information about merchants based on global positioning coordinates.
Electronic transaction histories
(Claim 1, Claim 10)
“For each payment card of the user, the card control computing system creates and stores a variety of card control rules. In various embodiments, the card control system creates the card control rules for the user automatically based on the transaction history of the user, demographic information about the user, transaction histories and/or card control rules of other user with similar transaction histories and demographics, and so on.”Records of past electronic transactions made by a user, including details such as merchant locations and transaction amounts.
Out-of-pattern transaction
(Claim 1, Claim 10)
“For example, a user may be a student at a local university. The card control system may create card control rules for the user based on the rules of other users with similar demographics and transaction histories. The demographics may, for example, include college-aged users. The transaction histories may, for example, include transactions at merchants near the local university.”An attempted electronic transaction that deviates from the user's typical transaction history, as determined by querying the electronic transaction histories of a subset of other users with similar demographics and transaction histories.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Date

    Description

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US11556936

WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Application Number
US15496961
Filing Date
Apr 25, 2017
Status
Granted
Expiry Date
Nov 17, 2038
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents