Patent No. US11582274 (titled "Videoconferencing System") was filed by Trustybell Gmbh on Nov 9, 2021.
’274 is related to the field of videoconferencing and telecommunications, specifically addressing the problem of verifying the identity of participants in a video or telephone call. The background acknowledges the increasing popularity of videoconferencing but highlights the lack of secure identity verification, which limits its use in situations requiring legal certainty, such as e-governance or remote official appointments. Current digital signature methods don't translate well to real-time identity assurance in video calls.
The underlying idea behind ’274 is to integrate a technical identity verification step into the videoconferencing process. This involves capturing a real-time image of the participant's face and comparing it to an image on an official identification document, such as an ID card. If the comparison is successful, verified identification data extracted from the document is then transmitted to the other participant's device and displayed, providing assurance of the caller's identity.
The claims of ’274 focus on a method and system for conducting a video or telephone call with identity verification. The method involves capturing a face image of a first participant and an image of their official ID, comparing the two images using image analysis , and then transmitting verified data (including name and other extracted information) to the second participant's device for display. The system includes cameras, a processor for image comparison, and a signal generator for transmitting the verified data.
In practice, the invention works by requiring the first participant to present their face and ID to the system's cameras immediately before initiating the call. The system then uses facial recognition or similar image analysis techniques to compare the live image with the ID photo. If the match is successful, the system extracts data like name, date of birth, etc., from the ID and transmits it to the second participant's screen, perhaps in a dedicated window or as an overlay. This allows the second participant to visually confirm the identity before and during the call.
This approach differs from prior solutions by providing a real-time, technically verified identity check within the videoconferencing workflow. Unlike simple digital signatures or unverified profiles, ’274 aims to provide a level of assurance comparable to in-person identification. The system can also optionally incorporate location verification and repeat the identity check during the call to ensure the participant's identity remains consistent.
In the early 2020s when ’274 was filed, videoconferencing was a widely adopted communication method, at a time when identity verification in such systems commonly relied on external services or manual processes rather than integrated, automated solutions. When hardware or software constraints made real-time image analysis and secure data transmission non-trivial, systems commonly relied on simpler methods for establishing trust between participants.
The claims were rejected in a non-final office action. Claims 1, and 4-15 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kenoyer in view of Benkreira. Claims 2-3, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kenoyer in view of Benkreira and further in view of Passe. The prosecution record does describe the technical reasoning and specific claim changes that led to allowance.
This patent contains 14 claims, with independent claims 1 and 14. Independent claim 1 focuses on a method for verifying a participant's identity in a video or telephone call, and providing that verified identity information to another participant. Independent claim 14 focuses on a system for performing the same function. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and refine the method of claim 1.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents