Patent No. US11761390 (titled "Dual Fuel Selector Switch") was filed by Champion Power Equipment Inc on Feb 16, 2022.
’390 is related to the field of dual-fuel generators, specifically addressing the problem of preventing the simultaneous use of two different fuel sources. Dual-fuel generators are designed to run on either gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), offering flexibility in fuel selection. However, existing systems with separate valves for each fuel lack a mechanism to positively prevent both valves from being open at the same time, which could lead to an unsafe mixing of fuels.
The underlying idea behind ’390 is to mechanically interlock the fuel selection process, ensuring that only one fuel source can be active at any given time. This is achieved through a sliding selector switch that physically blocks the valve handle of the inactive fuel source. The switch is designed such that moving it to select one fuel automatically prevents the other fuel's valve from being opened.
The claims of ’390 focus on a fuel selector mechanism that includes a selector switch with two modes: one enabling fuel flow from a first fuel source and another enabling fuel flow from a second fuel source. The claims also cover an interlock that prevents simultaneous operation of the fuel selector switches. The key is the mechanical linkage that makes it physically impossible to have both fuel sources supplying fuel to the engine at the same time.
In practice, the fuel selector includes a sliding switch positioned adjacent to the valve handles for each fuel source. When the switch is in the 'gasoline' position, it covers and locks the LPG valve handle in the OFF position, preventing it from being opened. Conversely, when the switch is moved to the 'LPG' position, it covers and locks the gasoline valve handle. This mechanical interlock ensures that only one fuel valve can be in the ON position at any given time.
This design differs from prior approaches that rely on the operator to manually ensure only one fuel valve is open. By introducing a physical barrier, the invention eliminates the possibility of human error and prevents the unsafe mixing of fuels. Furthermore, the design incorporates a carburetor solenoid switch that shuts off the gasoline flow when the selector switch is moved to the LPG position, providing an additional layer of safety and preventing any residual gasoline from entering the engine when it's running on LPG.
In the early 2010s when ’390 was filed, dual-fuel engines were known, but ensuring safe operation with multiple fuel sources presented challenges. At a time when systems commonly relied on mechanical linkages or basic electrical controls, preventing the simultaneous flow of different fuel types required careful design to avoid potentially hazardous fuel mixtures.
The examiner approved the patent because no prior art teaches all the limitations of claim 1, specifically a selector switch for a dual fuel generator with a first fuel mode delivering fuel from a first fuel source and a second fuel mode delivering a second fuel from a second fuel source, a fuel solenoid having open and closed positions and a solenoid switch having a closed position to activate the fuel solenoid, in which the solenoid switch is in the closed position when the selector switch is in the first fuel mode and the solenoid switch is open when the selector switch is in the second fuel mode. Also, no prior art teaches all the limitations of claim 11, specifically, a duel fuel generator that has a valve assembly connected to a first fuel source and a second fuel source, in which the valve assembly comprising a first selector switch to selectively control a first fuel flow and a second selector switch to selectively control a second fuel flow to an engine, an interlock positioned on the valve assembly to prevent simultaneous operation for the first selector switch and the second selector switch.
This patent contains 21 claims, with independent claims 1 and 11 directed to a fuel selector for a dual fuel generator. Independent claim 1 focuses on a selector switch and fuel solenoid configuration, while independent claim 11 focuses on a valve assembly with an interlock. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the components, configurations, and functionalities of the fuel selector described in the independent claims.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents