Patent No. US12010174 (titled "System And Method For Server Based Control") was filed by Smart Speaker Llc on Aug 23, 2021.
’174 is related to the field of building and vehicle automation, specifically systems that control actuators based on sensor data. Traditional building and vehicle automation systems often rely on dedicated hardware gateways to manage communication between sensors, actuators, and control logic. This patent addresses the limitations of these dedicated gateways, such as cost, reliability, and level of service.
The underlying idea behind ’174 is to replace the dedicated hardware gateway in a building or vehicle automation system with an Internet-connected control server that implements the control logic. This server communicates with sensors and actuators via a router or gateway within the building or vehicle, enabling centralized control and potentially improving cost-effectiveness and reliability. The control server can implement sophisticated control loops, such as PID control, and incorporate voice or image processing for enhanced functionality.
The claims of ’174 focus on a system comprising an Internet-connected control server, a router, a device associated with a sensor, and a device associated with an actuator. The independent claim specifically covers a system that uses a microphone in a client device to capture human voice data, sends this data to the control server for processing, and then operates a first actuator in the client device and a second actuator in a controlled device based on messages received from the server.
In practice, the invention allows for a more flexible and scalable automation system. For example, a user's voice command captured by a microphone in a smart speaker (the client device) could be processed by a remote server to adjust the thermostat (the first actuator) in the same room and simultaneously close the blinds (the second actuator) in another room. The system can also incorporate redundancy by using multiple sensors or actuators, or by using multiple data paths for communication.
’174 differentiates itself from prior approaches by moving the core control logic and processing to a remote, Internet-connected server. This eliminates the need for a dedicated, on-site gateway, potentially reducing hardware costs and simplifying system maintenance. Furthermore, the use of a remote server allows for more complex control algorithms and data processing capabilities, such as voice and image recognition , which may not be feasible with a traditional embedded gateway.
In the early 2010s when ’174 was filed, systems commonly relied on client-server architectures at a time when wireless networking was typically implemented using standards such as 802.11a/b/g/n. At that time, cloud computing and SaaS models were gaining traction, but hardware and software constraints made real-time control loops over the Internet non-trivial due to latency and reliability concerns.
The examiner approved the patent because no prior art, either individually or in combination, taught or suggested a system that sends first and second human voice data captured by a microphone in a client device to a server via a wireless network. The server processes this voice data and produces first and second messages, which are then used to operate a first actuator in the client device and a second actuator in a controlled device, respectively.
This patent contains 29 claims, with claim 1 being the only independent claim. Independent claim 1 is directed to a system for operating multiple actuators in response to captured human voice data within a building using a wireless network and a server. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and specify details of the system described in the independent claim, such as voice recognition algorithms, sensor data integration, actuator types, network configurations, and controlled device functionalities.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents