Patent No. US12110554 (titled "Methods For Classification Of Tissue Samples As Positive Or Negative For Cancer") was filed by Veracyte Inc on Jan 25, 2021.
’554 is related to the field of molecular diagnostics , specifically addressing the challenge of accurately diagnosing thyroid cancer. Current diagnostic methods, such as cytological examination, often suffer from subjective assessments, failure to identify underlying genetic causes, and inability to provide unambiguous diagnoses, leading to unnecessary surgeries and treatment costs. The invention aims to improve the accuracy and objectivity of thyroid cancer diagnosis through molecular profiling.
The underlying idea behind ’554 is to use a combination of gene expression analysis and genetic mutation detection to create a molecular profile of a thyroid tissue sample. This profile is then analyzed using a trained algorithm to classify the sample as either positive or negative for cancer. The key insight is that by integrating both gene expression and mutation data, a more accurate and reliable diagnosis can be achieved, reducing the reliance on subjective cytological assessments.
The claims of ’554 focus on a method for processing a tissue sample, starting with obtaining a tissue sample from a subject and subjecting a portion of it to a diagnostic screening process that indicates the sample as ambiguous or indeterminate. The method then involves assaying nucleic acid molecules derived from the tissue sample to generate a data set. A programmed computer processes this data set to identify the level of expression of one or more gene expression products and one or more genetic mutations . Finally, a trained algorithm uses this information to classify the tissue sample as positive or negative for cancer, and a report is electronically outputted.
In practice, the invention involves extracting RNA and DNA from a thyroid tissue sample, such as a fine needle aspirate. The RNA is analyzed to determine the expression levels of specific genes known to be associated with thyroid cancer, while the DNA is analyzed to detect the presence of mutations in relevant genes. The resulting data is then fed into a trained algorithm, which has been developed using a reference set of known cancerous and non-cancerous samples. The algorithm outputs a classification of the sample as either positive or negative for cancer, along with a confidence level.
This approach differs from prior methods that rely solely on cytological examination or single-marker genetic tests. By combining gene expression and mutation data, the invention provides a more comprehensive molecular profile of the tumor, allowing for a more accurate and objective diagnosis. This can lead to a reduction in false positives and false negatives, improved patient management, and a decrease in unnecessary surgeries and treatments. The use of a trained algorithm also ensures that the diagnostic process is standardized and reproducible, minimizing the impact of subjective interpretation.
In the late 2000s when ’554 was filed, methods for analyzing gene expression and identifying genetic polymorphisms were well-established, at a time when microarray technology was a common approach for high-throughput analysis of DNA and RNA. At that time, computational methods for analyzing large datasets were also prevalent, when systems commonly relied on statistical algorithms to identify correlations between genetic markers and disease states. Furthermore, when hardware or software constraints made complex data analysis non-trivial, specialized software packages were often employed to normalize and interpret microarray data.
The application was subject to a non-final rejection. Claims were rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as being directed to a judicial exception without significantly more, under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite, and under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) and 103(a) as being anticipated or unpatentable over prior art. Claims 34-35 were withdrawn from consideration. The prosecution record does NOT describe the technical reasoning or specific claim changes that led to allowance.
This patent contains 21 claims, with claim 1 being the only independent claim. Independent claim 1 is directed to a method for processing a tissue sample to classify it as positive or negative for cancer based on gene expression and genetic mutations. The dependent claims generally specify details and limitations to the method of independent claim 1, such as types of mutations, nucleic acids, tissues, cancers, binding agents, genes, accuracy levels, treatments, and screening processes.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents