Gemstone Planning

Patent No. US12117403 (titled "Gemstone Planning") was filed by De Beers Uk Ltd on May 21, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’403 is related to the field of gemstone cutting and planning, specifically optimizing the yield and quality of a faceted gemstone cut from a rough gemstone. Traditionally, this process involves creating detailed 3D models of both the rough stone and the target cut, which requires significant computational resources. The background highlights the need for efficient methods to determine the best possible cut while minimizing waste and maximizing the value of the final gemstone.

The underlying idea behind ’403 is to streamline the gemstone planning process by using 2D silhouette images for comparison instead of directly manipulating complex 3D models. The core insight is that by comparing 2D projections of the rough stone and the target cut, one can efficiently determine the optimal orientation, scale, and position of the target cut within the rough stone, thereby reducing the computational burden.

The claims of ’403 focus on a method and apparatus for determining the optimal target gemstone obtainable from a rough gemstone. This involves capturing a series of 2D silhouette images of the rough gemstone, generating a corresponding series of virtual 2D silhouette images from a 3D model of the desired target gemstone, and then comparing these two series of images to find the optimal transformation (rotation, translation, and scaling) to apply to the 3D model of the target gemstone.

In practice, the method involves illuminating the rough gemstone with collimated light and capturing silhouette images from various angles. A 3D model of the target gemstone is then virtually projected from the same angles to create corresponding silhouette images. The system then iteratively adjusts the scale, rotation, and position of the target gemstone's virtual silhouette until it finds the largest possible target gemstone that fits within the rough stone's silhouette, effectively maximizing yield.

This approach differentiates itself from prior methods by avoiding direct 3D model manipulation during the optimization process. Instead of computationally intensive 3D comparisons, the system compares 2D silhouette images, significantly reducing the processing power required. The method also uses a binary search-like approach with scaling factors (S1 and S2) to efficiently converge on the optimal scale , further enhancing the speed and efficiency of the gemstone planning process.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical landscape at the time

In the late 2010s when ’403 was filed, at a time when 3D modeling was typically implemented using a combination of specialized hardware and software, systems commonly relied on capturing multiple 2D images from different viewpoints to construct a 3D representation, and when hardware or software constraints made real-time processing of complex 3D models non-trivial.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The examiner approved the claims because the prior art, specifically Sivovolenko, does not teach comparing a first series of 2D silhouette images and a second series of virtual 2D silhouette images to determine an optimal transformation to be applied to the 3D model of the target gemstone. While other references teach individual aspects of the claimed invention, they do not disclose this specific combination of elements.

Claims

This patent contains 21 claims, with independent claims 1, 19, and 21. The independent claims focus on methods and an apparatus for determining an optimal target gemstone obtainable from a rough gemstone by comparing 2D silhouette images of the rough gemstone with virtual 2D silhouette images of a target gemstone. The dependent claims generally elaborate on and refine the methods described in the independent claims, adding details regarding image acquisition, correlation, scaling, and transformation processes.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
2D silhouette images
(Claim 1, Claim 19, Claim 21)
“The 3D model may be a surface model, obtained by illuminating the rough gemstone with collimated light from one side and capturing 2D silhouette images of the gemstone from the opposite side to the illumination. This should be repeated at many different viewpoints. These 2D images are then combined into a single 3D model.”Two-dimensional images of the rough gemstone or target gemstone captured using silhouette imaging techniques.
3D model
(Claim 1, Claim 19, Claim 21)
“In one example, the method comprises providing a 3D model of a rough gemstone which is to be cut to produce a target faceted gemstone. In this specific example, the “optimal” target stone is the largest stone which may be obtained from the rough gemstone. The 3D model may be a surface model, obtained by illuminating the rough gemstone with collimated light from one side and capturing 2D silhouette images of the gemstone from the opposite side to the illumination.”A three-dimensional representation of the target gemstone, used for generating virtual images and determining optimal transformations.
Optimal transformation
(Claim 1, Claim 19, Claim 21)
“The method comprises obtaining a first series of 2D images of the rough gemstone; providing a 3D model of a target gemstone to be obtained from the rough gemstone; generating a second series of 2D images of the target gemstone from the 3D model; and comparing the first and second series of 2D images to determine an optimal transformation to be applied to the 3D model of the target gemstone.”A combination of translational, rotational, and scaling adjustments applied to the 3D model of the target gemstone to find the best fit within the rough gemstone.
Virtual 2D silhouette images
(Claim 1, Claim 19, Claim 21)
“Generating a second series of 2D images of the target gemstone from the 3D model thereof may comprise virtually positioning a plurality of virtual cameras around the 3D model of the target gemstone, each virtual camera configured to capture one or more 2D images of the target gemstone from its respective position. The method may comprise virtually illuminating the 3D model of the target gemstone with collimated light.”Two-dimensional silhouette images generated from the 3D model of the target gemstone using virtual cameras and lighting.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US12117403

DE BEERS UK LTD
Application Number
US17620434
Filing Date
May 21, 2020
Status
Granted
Expiry Date
May 21, 2040
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents