Patent No. US12144743 (titled "Intervertebral Implant") was filed by Moskowitz Family Llc on Oct 4, 2021.
’743 is related to the field of spinal fusion, specifically addressing the need for improved intervertebral implants. Traditional spinal fusion techniques often involve supplemental fixation methods like pedicle screws or anterior plating, which can lead to complications such as nerve injury, vascular damage, and adjacent segment disease. The patent aims to provide a stand-alone device that minimizes these risks while still achieving effective spinal fusion.
The underlying idea behind ’743 is to create a bi-directional fixating transvertebral (BDFT) screw/cage apparatus that combines the functions of an intervertebral spacer and a bone fixation device. This is achieved by integrating angled screw guides within the cage structure, allowing screws to pass through the vertebral bodies above and below the implant. A key element is a screw locking mechanism using leaf springs that engage with ratcheted screw heads, preventing screw back-out after insertion.
The claims of ’743 focus on an intervertebral implant designed for insertion between vertebral bodies to promote fusion. The implant includes a cage with a space for bone filling, a top wall with a top surface, and internal screw guides. These guides have entry openings on the top surface and exit openings on the bottom surface and side surface of the top wall. A screw with a threaded body and head is inserted through the guide, and the screw head's abutment against a surface within the guide inhibits back-out. Importantly, the side walls of the implant exclude any portion of any entry opening of an internal screw guide .
In practice, the surgeon selects an appropriately sized cage and packs it with bone fusion material. The cage is then inserted into the prepared disc space. Self-drilling screws are guided through the internal screw guides, penetrating the adjacent vertebral bodies. As the screws are tightened, the ratchet mechanism and leaf spring ensure unidirectional movement, locking the screws in place and preventing loosening. This design eliminates the need for supplemental fixation in many cases, reducing surgical time and potential complications.
The invention differentiates itself from prior approaches by integrating the fixation mechanism directly into the intervertebral cage. Unlike traditional methods that rely on separate plates and screws, this design provides a more streamlined and potentially less invasive solution. The internal screw guides with a predetermined angle simplify screw placement and reduce the risk of misdirection. The leaf spring locking mechanism offers a reliable way to prevent screw back-out, a common issue with conventional spinal implants.
In the mid-2000s when ’743 was filed, spinal fusion techniques commonly relied on pedicle screw placement and anterior plating to stabilize the spine after discectomy or other procedures, at a time when hardware or software constraints made minimally invasive surgical techniques non-trivial. These methods, while effective, were associated with complications such as nerve injury, blood loss, and hardware failure, when systems commonly relied on rigid fixation which often led to adjacent segment disease.
The examiner approved the application because the claims were not rejected based on prior art. No references or combinations of references disclosed or suggested an intervertebral implant with the specific features claimed in claim 2. These features include a first exit opening formed in both the bottom surface and the first side surface of the top wall, abutment of the first screw head and the first surface inhibiting screw backout, and the first and second sidewalls excluding any portion of any entry opening of an internal screw guide. Although Waugh (US 2008/0249575 A1) discloses some of these features, it does not disclose all of them in a single embodiment, and modifying Waugh to include all the limitations would require changing the number, position, and/or orientation of the apertures without any reasonable motivation.
This patent contains 23 claims, with claim 1 being the only independent claim. Independent claim 1 is directed to an intervertebral implant with internal screw guides and screws for fusion. The dependent claims generally elaborate on specific features, configurations, and systems related to the intervertebral implant described in the independent claim.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents