Patent No. US12381173 (titled "Direct Hybrid Bonding Of Substrates Having Microelectronic Components With Different Profiles And/Or Pitches At The Bonding Interface") was filed by Bank Of America Na on Dec 16, 2022.
’173 is related to the field of polishing integrated circuits, specifically chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) for hybrid bonding. Hybrid bonding is a technique used to bond microelectronic components, such as dies and wafers, forming electrical connections without adhesives. A key challenge in this process is achieving a planar surface on both the dielectric layers and the embedded conductive structures (e.g., copper pads) to ensure a strong and reliable bond. Conventional CMP techniques often result in dielectric erosion (rounding of the dielectric surface) and conductive structure dishing (recessing of the conductive structures), which can compromise the bond quality.
The underlying idea behind ’173 is to control the CMP process to minimize dielectric erosion and conductive structure dishing during the preparation of surfaces for hybrid bonding. This is achieved by carefully managing the material removal rates of the dielectric, barrier layer, and conductive structures during polishing. The key insight is to maintain a steady-state polishing process where the removal rates of these materials are balanced, resulting in a planar surface with minimal recessing of the conductive structures and minimal rounding of the dielectric.
The claims of ’173 focus on a component comprising two substrates directly hybrid bonded together. Each substrate has a dielectric layer and two pluralities of conductive structures with different profiles or pitches. The first and second substrates are bonded such that at least one conductive structure on each substrate is directly bonded to a corresponding conductive structure on the other substrate. The first dielectric layer at the bonding interface comprises a deposited layer including nitrogen. The claims emphasize the direct physical contact between copper structures on both substrates and the different profiles or pitches of the conductive structures.
In practice, the invention involves a multi-step CMP process. First, a dielectric layer is deposited and patterned on a substrate, creating openings. A barrier layer is then deposited over the dielectric and within the openings, followed by the deposition of a conductive structure. The conductive structure is then polished to expose the barrier layer, and the barrier layer is selectively polished to reveal the bonding surface of the dielectric. The polishing parameters, such as slurry composition, polishing pressure, and pad type, are carefully controlled to achieve the desired material removal rates and minimize dishing and erosion. The use of a reactive liquid slurry helps to maintain a uniform conductive structure removal rate.
The invention differentiates itself from prior approaches by focusing on achieving a steady-state polishing process and by using different profiles or pitches of conductive structures. Traditional CMP methods often result in excessive dishing and erosion due to uneven material removal. By carefully balancing the polishing rates and using specific pad layouts, the invention minimizes these defects, leading to a more reliable hybrid bond. The use of different profiles or pitches of conductive structures also allows for greater design flexibility and reduces the need for dummy pads, which can negatively impact signal integrity. The nitrogen-containing dielectric layer at the bonding interface further enhances the bond strength and reliability.
In the early 2020s when ’173 was filed, hybrid bonding was an established technique for connecting microelectronic components, at a time when chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) was typically used to prepare surfaces for bonding. Systems commonly relied on precise control of material removal rates during CMP to achieve the required planarity and feature dimensions, when hardware or software constraints made uniform polishing across the substrate non-trivial.
The examiner allowed the claims because of arguments and amendments made by the applicant, specifically addressing rejections under 35 USC 102. The examiner was persuaded by the applicant's arguments regarding drawing objections, leading to their withdrawal. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection was also rendered moot due to claim amendments. The examiner specifically noted the section "REMARKS" and "Rejections under 35 USC 102" in the applicant's amendment filed on November 20, 2024, as well as the "Allowable Subject Matter" section in the Office Action mailed August 27, 2024.
This patent contains 26 claims, with independent claims 1 and 16 directed to a component comprising first and second substrates with conductive structures. The dependent claims generally elaborate on the features, dimensions, materials, and arrangements of the conductive structures and substrates described in the independent claims.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Date
Description
Get instant alerts for new documents