Tobacco Smoke Filter

Patent No. US3533416 (titled "Tobacco Smoke Filter") was filed by American Filtrona on May 8, 1968. The application was issued on Oct 13, 1970.

'416 is related to the field of tobacco smoke filters, specifically those used in cigarettes, cigars, and pipes. The background acknowledges the trade-off between filtration efficiency (removing undesirable constituents from smoke) and other commercially important properties like pressure drop, taste, and manufacturing cost. Existing cellulose acetate filters have low efficiency, and attempts to improve filtration often lead to unacceptable pressure drops or increased costs.

The underlying idea behind '416 is to create a filter with high filtration efficiency without compromising pressure drop or taste. This is achieved by maximizing the surface area of the filtering material exposed to the smoke. The key insight is to create a filter element with internal cavities that force the smoke to pass through the filtering material multiple times, increasing contact and improving filtration.

The claims of '416 focus on a filter element comprising an outer hollow member and an inner hollow member. The inner member is constructed from filtering material and has portions that seal against the inner surface of the outer member, creating elongated cavities between the two. The inner member also has crimped or sealed portions that force smoke to pass through the filtering material before entering and exiting the internal cavities.

In practice, the filter element is constructed by rolling a sheet of filtering material into a hollow tube (the inner member). This tube is then crimped at intervals to create sealed sections. The crimped tube is then overwrapped with a plug wrap (the outer member), forming the filter element. The smoke enters the filter, passes through the first cavity between the inner and outer members, then through the filtering material of the inner member, into the second cavity inside the inner member, and finally exits the filter.

This design differentiates itself from prior approaches by maximizing the surface area of the filtering material exposed to the smoke while maintaining a low pressure drop. Unlike traditional filters that rely on increased density or length to improve filtration, '416 uses a cavity-based design to force the smoke to interact with the filtering material more effectively. The filter can also be modified to include sorbent materials like activated carbon for improved gas phase filtration.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 1960s when '416 was filed, filter technology for smoking articles was constrained by a trade-off between filtration efficiency and other commercially important properties. At a time when filter designs commonly relied on increasing filter density or length to improve filtration, this approach led to unacceptable pressure drops. When hardware or software constraints made the incorporation of additional filtration elements non-trivial, filter designs had to balance filtration performance with taste, hardness, appearance, and manufacturing cost.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed filter represents a technical advancement by providing high filtration efficiency without compromising pressure drop, taste, or manufacturing cost. The filter achieves this by employing a structural solution that creates elongated, high-surface-area cavities on either side of a thin filtering wall. This architectural shift maximizes the available surface area of the filtering material exposed to smoke, enabling high filtration efficiencies while maintaining commercially acceptable pressure drop and other characteristics. The design also allows for the incorporation of sorbent materials to enhance gas phase filtration without significantly increasing pressure drop or cost.

Claims

This patent contains zero claims, therefore there are no independent or dependent claims to analyze. Consequently, there is no focus of independent claims or role of dependent claims to describe.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)	Support for Specification	Interpretation
Filtering material (Claim 1)	The filter means is constructed to provide a pair of elongated, high surface area, cavities defined on opposite sides of a relatively thin wall formed of filtering material, preferably only the ends of the filter means contacting an overwrapped outer tube thereby presenting maximum available surface area of the material from which the products are formed to the smoke for filtration.	A material used to remove undesirable constituents from tobacco smoke.
Filtration efficiency (Claim 1)	Perhaps the most important property of a filter means is its efficiency, that is, its ability to remove undesirable constituents from tobacco smoke. Filtration efficiency is ordinarily measured in terms of the percentage of total particulate matter (TPM) removed from the smoke although there is also some concern for the percentage of gas phase constituents which a filter means is capable of removing.	The ability of a filter to remove undesirable constituents from tobacco smoke, measured in terms of the percentage of total particulate matter (TPM) removed.
Gas phase (Claim 1)	Filtration efficiency is ordinarily measured in terms of the percentage of total particulate matter (TPM) removed from the smoke although there is also some concern for the percentage of gas phase constituents which a filter means is capable of removing. Another feature of the instant invention is the provision of a filter means which, in addition to having exceptionally high total particulate matter filtration efficiency, can be readily modified to provide exceptionally high gas phase filtration efficiency without adversely affecting the pressure drop, “taste” hardness, appearance or cost.	The gaseous components of tobacco smoke that a filter may remove.
Pressure drop (Claim 1)	While filtration efficiency is perhaps the most important property of a cigarette filter means, it has been necessary, with prior art filter devices, to compromise the filtration efficiency in order to provide the filter with other properties such as pressure drop, taste, hardness, appearance and cost which are important from the standpoint of acceptability. For example, the most commonly utilized cellulose acetate filter means has a relatively low filtration efficiency since increased efficiency can only be obtained either by increasing the density of the filtering material or the length of the filter element, both of which produce a pressure drop across the filter which is excessive and unacceptable from a commercial standpoint.	The resistance to airflow through the filter.
Total particulate matter (Claim 1)	Filtration efficiency is ordinarily measured in terms of the percentage of total particulate matter (TPM) removed from the smoke although there is also some concern for the percentage of gas phase constituents which a filter means is capable of removing. In any event, it is well known in the industry that there is no filter means presently on the market which provides relatively high filtration efficiency, on the order of60 —95 percent (TPM), without suffering from undesirably high manufacturing costs, poor taste, high pressure drop or other such commercially unacceptable characteristics.	The total amount of solid and liquid particles in tobacco smoke that a filter is designed to remove.

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

Get instant alerts for new documents

US3533416

AMERICAN FILTRONA

Application Number: US3533416D
Filing Date: May 8, 1968
Publication Date: Oct 13, 1970
External Links: Slate, USPTO, Google Patents

IP Verse