Method of purifying protein

Patent No. US7332289 (titled "Method of purifying protein") on Sep 9, 2003. The application was issued on Feb 19, 2008.

What is this patent about?

’289 is related to the field of protein purification, specifically the removal of host cell or viral DNA from samples containing physiologically active proteins like monoclonal antibodies. In the production of recombinant biologics, stringent regulatory standards require that residual DNA be reduced to extremely low levels (e.g., less than 100 pg per dose) to ensure patient safety. Traditional methods rely on complex, multi-stage chromatographic processes such as anion-exchange or hydroxyapatite chromatography, which are often costly, labor-intensive, and can result in inconsistent yields.

The underlying idea behind ’289 is that contaminant DNA can be effectively precipitated and removed by exploiting the formation of protein-DNA conjugates under specific ionic conditions. The inventors discovered that when a protein sample is maintained in a state of low conductivity and transitioned from an acidic to a neutral pH, the DNA interacts with the protein to form visible particles or cloudiness. By intentionally inducing this precipitation and then physically removing the resulting solids, the DNA concentration in the remaining liquid is drastically reduced without the need for specialized resin-based separation.

The claims of ’289 focus on a specific four-step process for purifying antibody-containing samples using a combination of affinity chromatography and controlled precipitation. The method requires first capturing the antibody on a Protein A or Protein G column and eluting it using an acidic solution with a molarity of 100 mM or less. This low-molarity eluate is then neutralized to a pH between 4 and 8, maintaining the low molarity to trigger the formation of particles, which are subsequently removed to yield a purified product.

In practice, the invention works by taking the acidic output of a standard affinity capture step and carefully adjusting the environment to favor conjugate formation. While the patent notes that a small percentage of the target protein is lost because it is bound within the removed particles, the vast majority—typically around 90%—remains in the solution. The removal of these particles is achieved through simple mechanical means, such as filtration through a 0.22 μm filter or centrifugation, making the process significantly faster than traditional secondary chromatography steps.

This approach differentiates itself from prior art by turning a common problem—protein aggregation or precipitation—into a selective purification tool. Instead of viewing the cloudiness that occurs during neutralization as a failure of the buffer system, the invention uses it as a DNA-scavenging mechanism. By strictly controlling the conductivity and molarity during the pH shift, the method achieves DNA levels as low as 22.5 pg/ml, providing a streamlined and cost-effective alternative to the complex sequences of ion-exchange columns usually required in downstream processing.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the early 2000s when ’289 was filed, the production of recombinant protein formulations was typically implemented using mammalian cell culture systems that necessitated rigorous purification to meet international safety standards for residual host cell DNA. At a time when systems commonly relied on multi-stage chromatographic sequences—such as combining anion-exchange, hydroxyapatite, and size-exclusion chromatography—to achieve required purity levels, the process of isolating physiologically active proteins from contaminant DNA was often labor-intensive and costly. Engineering constraints of the era made the stable and efficient removal of DNA non-trivial, as standard affinity chromatography steps often resulted in the formation of DNA-protein conjugates that were difficult to resolve without complex secondary processing.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement by introducing a simplified purification architecture that leverages the controlled formation and removal of particles to eliminate contaminant DNA. Rather than relying on traditional multi-step chromatographic separation, the process utilizes a specific sequence of converting a protein sample into a low-conductivity acidic or alkaline solution, followed by pH adjustment to a neutral level to induce the formation of DNA-protein conjugate particles. This architectural shift enables the removal of DNA through simple physical separation, such as filtration, achieving extremely low DNA concentrations with high protein recovery. The technical effect is a streamlined, less expensive purification method that overcomes the instability and complexity associated with conventional high-resolution chromatography for DNA clearance.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 13 claims, with claim 1 serving as the sole independent claim. This primary claim focuses on a method for removing contaminant DNA from antibody samples through a specific sequence of affinity chromatography, low-conductivity acidic elution, and pH-driven particle formation and removal. The dependent claims serve to further define the process parameters, such as specific molarity ranges, pH levels, and buffer types, while also narrowing the application to particular types of humanized monoclonal antibodies and filtration techniques.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Acidic aqueous solution of low conductivity
(Claim 1)
As used herein, an “acidic aqueous solution of low conductivity” generally refers to an aqueous solution of pH 1.5 to pH 3.9, preferably-of pH 2.0 to pH 3.9, more preferably of pH 2.0 to pH 3.0, which has a molarity of 0 to 100 mM, preferably 0 to 50 mM, more preferably 0 to 30 mM, or has an ionic strength of 0 to 0.2, preferably 0 to 0.12, or has a conductivity of 0 to 300 mS/m, preferably 0 to 200 mS/m, more preferably 0 to 150 mS/m. The acidic aqueous solution may be selected from aqueous solutions of hydrochloric acid, citric acid, acetic acid and other acids. The type, conductivity and pH of acidic aqueous solution of low conductivity will vary depending on the type of physiologically active protein or antibody to be purified.An aqueous solution with a pH ranging from 1.5 to 3.9 and a low concentration of solutes, specifically defined by a molarity of 0 to 100 mM, an ionic strength of 0 to 0.2, or a conductivity of 0 to 300 mS/m.
Antibody-containing sample
(Claim 1)
As used herein, a “sample containing a physiologically active protein” or an “antibody-containing sample” preferably refers to a culture medium of mammalian cells (e.g., CHO cells) containing a physiologically active protein or antibody molecules produced by culture, which may further be subjected to partial purification or other specific treatment.A biological fluid, such as a mammalian cell culture medium (e.g., from CHO cells), containing produced antibody molecules, which may have undergone partial purification.
Neutralizing
(Claim 1)
In the method of the present invention, after a sample containing a physiologically active protein is converted into an acidic aqueous solution of low conductivity, the resulting sample is neutralized by addition of a buffer to raise the pH to a neutral level. A neutral level will vary depending on the type of physiologically active protein or antibody to be purified. It usually ranges from pH 4 to pH 8, preferably pH 4.3 to pH 7.5, and more preferably pH 4.5 to pH 7.5.The process of adding a buffer to an acidic eluate to raise the pH to a neutral level (typically pH 4 to 8), which triggers the formation of protein-DNA conjugate particles.
Particles
(Claim 1)
According to the present invention, the solution neutralized to a neutral pH level in the above stage, in turn, produces particles (i.e., becomes clouded). Without being bound by any particular theory, the inventors of the present invention estimate that each of these particles is a conjugate formed between physiologically active protein and DNA. Particle removal by filtration results in a small loss of physiologically active protein because it is removed in the form of DNA-physiologically active protein conjugates.Physical precipitates or cloudiness formed upon neutralization of the low-conductivity acidic eluate, estimated to be conjugates formed between the physiologically active protein and contaminant DNA.
Removing the particles
(Claim 1)
These particles may be removed by filtration through a filter to ensure efficient removal of contaminant DNA. Examples of a filter available for filtration include, but are not limited to, a 1.0-0.2 μm Cellulose Acetate Filter System (Corning) or TFF. Alternatively, these particles may also be removed by centrifugation or any other techniques for efficient particle removal; procedures for removal are not limited to filtration through a filter.The physical separation of the protein-DNA conjugate precipitates from the solution, achieved through methods such as filtration or centrifugation.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
1:23-cv-11573Jul 13, 2023Genentech, Inc. V. Biogen Ma Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US7332289

Application Number
US10471374A
Filing Date
Sep 9, 2003
Publication Date
Feb 19, 2008
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents