Patent No. US7606156 (titled "Residential communications gateway (RCG) for broadband communications over a plurality of standard POTS lines, with dynamic allocation of said bandwidth, that requires no additional equipment or modifications to the associated class 5 offices or the PSTN at large") on Oct 14, 2003. The application was issued on Oct 20, 2009.
'156 is related to the field of telecommunications, specifically addressing the challenge of providing enhanced communication services to residential and small business customers over existing Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) lines. The background involves Competitive Local Exchange Companies (CLECs) seeking to compete with Local Exchange Companies (LECs) without incurring the high infrastructure costs associated with technologies like DSL and cable.
The underlying idea behind '156 is to create a Residential Communications Gateway (RCG) that combines the functionalities of an IP router, a Class 5 circuit switch, and a wireless LAN in a single device. This gateway leverages packetized data and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies, along with RF communications, to transmit voice, data, and video over existing POTS lines, effectively creating multiple virtual lines and broadband access without requiring upgrades to the central office.
The claims of '156 focus on a method for aggregating, sharing, and dynamically routing bandwidth from multiple wired and wireless networks distributed over a wide area. This involves creating and updating a network table of nearby RCGs, determining the optimal bandwidth needed for a data transfer, selecting supporting RCGs based on their unused bandwidth and distance, requesting bandwidth, receiving responses, selecting RCGs for optimal use, sending control information, transmitting data packets, reassembling packets at the requesting RCG, and relinquishing bandwidth.
In practice, the RCG is installed in a residence and connected to the existing POTS line. It then connects to a service provider via a modem connection to establish a constant network connection. The RCG can then offer up to three separate telephone numbers over a single POTS line, along with broadband access and other advanced features. When a requesting RCG needs more bandwidth, it can use its wireless interface to find nearby RCGs and request access to their unused POTS bandwidth, creating a multilink PPP connection to achieve higher data transfer rates.
This approach differentiates itself from prior solutions like DSL and cable by eliminating the need for costly infrastructure upgrades at the central office. Unlike Internet-based VoIP services, the RCG aims to provide a guaranteed Quality of Service (QoS) by prioritizing voice traffic and dynamically allocating bandwidth. Furthermore, the RCG's ability to create a multilink PPP connection allows it to achieve broadband-like speeds over existing POTS lines by leveraging the unused bandwidth of neighboring RCGs, offering a cost-effective solution for ubiquitous high-speed communications.
In the early 2000s when ’156 was filed, residential telecommunications were characterized by a transition from traditional analog services to digital data integration at a time when voice services were typically implemented using circuit-switched copper lines provided by local exchange carriers. During this era, systems commonly relied on separate infrastructures for telephony and high-speed data, and hardware constraints made the integration of IP routing, wireless local area networking, and traditional telephony into a single residential gateway non-trivial. Engineering practices often required distinct modems or specialized technical knowledge for broadband deployment, as quality-of-service capabilities for real-time voice over packet-switched networks were not yet standard in consumer-grade residential hardware.
Following the filing of this application, the examiner issued a final office action rejecting claims 10-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 for lack of written description. The record indicates that while claims 1-9 were withdrawn from consideration, the examiner stated that claims 10-14 would be allowable if amended or rewritten to overcome the specific procedural rejections regarding the original specification's disclosure. The prosecution record does not describe the technical reasoning or specific claim changes that led to a subsequent allowance, noting only that the applicant's previous arguments were rendered moot by the new grounds of rejection.
This patent contains 5 claims, with claim 1 being independent. Independent claim 1 is directed to a method for aggregating, sharing, dynamically routing, and allocating bandwidth from multiple wired and wireless networks to provide bandwidth to users on demand. Dependent claims 2-5 build upon claim 1, adding further specifications and steps to the method, such as requesting bandwidth from a single supporting resource, prioritizing local bandwidth demand, dynamically reallocating bandwidth, and scheduling data transfers.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents