Container with auto-opening lid

Patent No. US7621420 (titled "Container with auto-opening lid") on Jul 13, 2005. The application was issued on Nov 24, 2009.

What is this patent about?

’420 is related to the field of consumer product packaging, specifically focusing on portable containers for moisture-sensitive items like wet tissues. These containers typically employ a spring-loaded lid and a simple latch to allow for one-handed operation; however, such designs are prone to accidental opening during transport or when subjected to external pressure, such as from shrink-wrap packaging or being jostled in a bag.

The underlying idea behind ’420 is a dual-purpose safety mechanism that integrates a sliding lock directly into the primary release button. Rather than just blocking the button's movement, the inventor realized that the locking component should serve as a redundant mechanical bridge. By sliding the lock into position, it simultaneously physically hooks into the lid and braces against the container’s internal frame, creating a rigid assembly that prevents both the button from being depressed and the lid from flexing open.

The claims of ’420 focus on a specific nested assembly where a sliding locking member is housed on the underside of a push-button operation surface. The independent claim requires that this locking member be supported by the operation member so they move together when depressed, while also being slidable through a dedicated guide groove formed within the button's own integrated spring portion. This configuration ensures that the locking member can transition between a state of interference with the container body and a state of free movement.

In practice, the invention works by utilizing the button's internal geometry to manage the lock's travel. The locking member features leg portions that, when slid forward, align with a locking surface on the container body to provide a hard stop against downward pressure. Simultaneously, a locking portion on the slider enters a concave port in the lid. This creates a high-integrity closure that does not rely solely on the small plastic latch pawl, which is often the failure point in traditional designs when the container is squeezed.

This approach differs from prior solutions by consolidating the locking and opening components into a single sub-assembly that can be installed into the container as one unit. By placing the slider behind the button and using a finger-placing portion that extends the lever arm, the design improves mechanical advantage for the user while protecting the internal spring from permanent deformation. This is particularly effective for containers with constricted, ergonomic shapes where external films might otherwise trigger the release mechanism.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the early 2000s when ’420 was filed, consumer packaging for moist wipes and similar goods was typically implemented using push-button release mechanisms that relied on the elastic deformation of plastic components to maintain a seal. At a time when these systems commonly relied on simple mechanical interference between a spring-loaded lid and a depressible latch, ensuring both child-resistance and accidental-opening prevention was non-trivial due to the inherent flexibility of molded resin parts. Standard architectures often required multiple separate components to be individually mounted to the container housing, which increased assembly complexity and introduced failure points where the latch could bypass the locking mechanism if the housing was compressed or deformed during transport.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention achieves a technical advancement in container security and assembly efficiency through an integrated latch-and-lock architecture. By attaching a sliding locking member directly to the depressible operation member, the system enables a dual-action security state where the locking member simultaneously abuts a rigid surface of the container body and meshes directly with the lid itself. This structural shift overcomes the constraint of component deformation, as the lid is secured not just by the latch’s position, but by a secondary physical interference provided by the slider. Furthermore, the integration of these two components into a single sub-assembly reduces manufacturing complexity while enabling a lever-action capability that reduces the force required to open the lid when the lock is disengaged.

Claims

This patent contains a total of 6 claims, with claim 1 serving as the sole independent claim. The independent claim focuses on a container featuring an auto-opening lid mechanism that utilizes a spring-urged lid and a depressible operation member equipped with a sliding locking member to prevent or permit opening. The dependent claims serve to further define the mechanical assembly, specifically detailing extraction prevention features, shaft and groove configurations, and various pawl or stopper arrangements that secure the locking member within the operation member.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Guide surface
(Claim 1)
A guide surface, which is in contact with the locking member, may be formed on the back surface side of the operation member. The locking member is held so as to be slidable along the guide surface on the back surface side with respect to the operation surface. The locking member may be supported so as to be slidable between the locking position and the release position while being in contact with the guide surface by being inserted into a groove formed in the spring portion.A flat or contoured area on the underside of the operation member that provides a sliding track and support for the locking member's movement.
Locking member
(Claim 1)
Moving the locking member to the locking position makes it impossible for the operation member to be operated to the open position, by which the lid can be prevented from being unintentionally opened. Since the locking member is meshed with the lid at the locking position, an effect of preventing the opening of the lid can be enhanced in comparison with the case that the locking member merely restrains the operation member. Since the locking member is attached to the operation member, the operation member can be assembled to the locking member before they are attached to the container main body.A component attached to the operation member that selectively prevents or permits the opening of the lid by moving between a locking position (where it engages both the lid and a locking surface on the container body) and a release position.
Locking surface
(Claim 1)
A leg portion, which is a butted against the locking surface of the container main body at the locking position, may be disposed on the back surface side of the locking member. It is made impossible for the operation member to be depressed when the locking member is located at the locking position by causing the leg portion to come into contact with the locking surface.A structural part of the container main body that serves as a physical stop for the locking member to prevent the operation member from being depressed when in the locked state.
Operation surface
(Claim 1)
An operation surface, which is exposed to an outside surface side of the container main body, may be formed to the operation member, and the locking member may be disposed so as to be movable between the locking position and the release position on a back surface side of the operation surface. In this case, it is possible to conceal the locking member behind the operation surface so that it is indistinctive. The operation member may be disposed so as to move from the close position to the open position by depressing the operation surface.The external-facing part of the operation member that a user interacts with (typically by depressing) to actuate the lid release mechanism.
Spring portion
(Claim 1)
A guide surface, which is in contact with the locking member, may be formed on the back surface side of the operation member as well as a spring portion, which protrudes from the guide surface and urges the operation member to the close position, is disposed to the back surface side thereof. The locking member may be supported so as to be slidable between the locking position and the release position while being in contact with the guide surface by being inserted into a groove formed in the spring portion. When the spring portion is disposed on the back surface side of the operation member, the operation member is prevented from moving to the open position in the packaged state.An elastic element extending from the back of the operation member that provides the return force to keep the operation member in the close position and includes a structural channel for the locking member.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
4:25-cv-00503May 22, 2025Simplehuman Llc V. Hms Manufacturing Company Llc

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US7621420

Application Number
US10542077A
Filing Date
Jul 13, 2005
Publication Date
Nov 24, 2009
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents