Fiber composite and process of manufacture

Patent No. US8328666 (titled "Fiber composite and process of manufacture") on Dec 9, 2010. The application was issued on Dec 11, 2012.

What is this patent about?

'666 is related to the field of manufacturing composite structures, specifically sports racquets like tennis and badminton racquets, golf club shafts, and bicycle frames. Traditional methods involve manual labor, molds, and air injection to form graphite composite frames. These frames are typically hollow, which presents limitations in achieving thinner, stronger designs and can contribute to vibration-related injuries.

The underlying idea behind '666 is to use a foamable plastic material within a closed layup to apply pressure during the curing process, eliminating the need for air injection. This is achieved by incorporating a microencapsulated foaming agent into the layup. When heated, the agent expands, pressing the fiber layers against the mold walls and fusing them together. This results in a solid, rather than hollow, frame.

The claims of '666 focus on a resin and fiber composite racquet comprising two tubular members: one extending around the head, and another extending from the handle, around the head, and back to the handle. Each tubular member has an outer shell of fiber layers secured by a resin, and a second resinous material inside the cavity defining voids containing a gaseous material under pressure exceeding 30 psi.

In practice, the process involves wrapping layers of fiber (e.g., graphite) permeated with resin around a mandrel. A powdered, microencapsulated foaming agent is then placed inside the wrapped layers, and the ends are sealed to form a closed bladder. This bladder is placed in a mold and heated. The heat causes the foaming agent to expand, creating pressure that forces the fiber layers against the mold, resulting in a solid, cured composite structure. The closed-cell foam also dampens vibrations.

This method differs from traditional air injection techniques in several key ways. It eliminates the need for manual attachment of air nozzles, enabling a more automated and consistent manufacturing process. The resulting solid frame can be made thinner and stronger than conventional hollow frames, improving swing speed and feel. Furthermore, the solid core reduces vibration and shock, potentially minimizing injuries. The use of microencapsulated foaming agents allows for precise control over the expansion process, ensuring optimal pressure and fiber alignment during curing.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when '666 was filed, graphite composite structures were commonly manufactured using manual layup processes and air injection techniques. At a time when composite sports equipment was typically implemented using hollow tubular designs, internal divisions or complex geometries were difficult to control due to variations in air pressure during manufacturing. When hardware or software constraints made automated manufacturing processes non-trivial, manual labor was heavily relied upon for tasks such as material cutting, layup formation, and mold closing.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention provides a carbon composite frame structure with increased strength and reliability by incorporating a foam plastic core within the frame head and handle. This architectural shift from hollow frames to foam-filled frames addresses the problem of vibration and shock propagation, particularly in off-center shots. By using a micro-encapsulated plastic material with a foaming agent, the invention enables a more uniform and automated manufacturing process, eliminating the need for manual air nozzle attachment. This results in a closed-end frame design, potentially improving shock absorption and enabling the creation of thinner, solid racquet frames with enhanced performance characteristics.

Claims

This patent contains 4 claims, with claims 1 and 3 being independent. The independent claims are directed to a resin and fiber composite racket comprising tubular members. The dependent claims further define the composition and configuration of the tubular members.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
First resinous material
(Claim 1)
By resinous material is meant any material which can be used in graphite or fiberglass composite to bind the fibers into a substantially rigid structure.A substance used to bind the fibers together within the outer shell.
First tubular member
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
Advantageously, inner and outer tubular members may be used to form the racquet frame, with the inner tubular member extending around the head of the racquet frame.A tubular component of the racquet that encircles the head.
Layers of fibers
(Claim 1)
In a typical process, a “layup” is created by manually rolling multiple sheets or laminations (which take the form of strips of planar material), commonly formed of fibrous material, such as carbon or graphite fiber or fiberglass, to form a bladder. The bladder is formed, for example, using a number of “sheets” of graphite fiber, permeated, for example saturated, with an uncured thermoplastic or thermosetting resin.Multiple sheets of fibrous material forming the outer shell of the tubular members.
Second resinous material
(Claim 1)
The inventive resin and fiber composite may comprise an outer shell defining a cavity, the outer shell comprising a plurality of layers of fibers. A first resinous material is disposed between the fibers and secures the fibers to each other. A second resinous material is disposed inside the cavity, the second resinous material being configured and dimensioned to define voids within the cavity between portions of the second resinous material.A substance inside the cavity of the outer shell that creates voids.
Second tubular member
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
An artifact of this process is that composite racquet frames are commonly of a single-tube design. The two ends of the layup tube may be, for example in the case of tennis racquets, at the bottom of the racquet. In other words, the tube begins at the base of the tennis racquet handle, proceeds in a substantially straight direction along the length of the tennis racquet handle, extends around the oval string supporting frame shape and continues contiguous with the initial portion of the tube in a substantially straight direction back to the base of the tennis racquet handle.A tubular component of the racquet that extends from the handle base, around the head, and back to the handle base.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
1:25-cv-02066Nov 17, 2025Xene Innovations, LLC v. The Boeing Company

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US8328666

Application Number
US12964690A
Filing Date
Dec 9, 2010
Publication Date
Dec 11, 2012
External Links
Slate, USPTO, Google Patents