Patent No. US8667881 (titled "Selectable dual mode trigger for semiautomatic firearms") on Dec 14, 2012. The application was issued on Mar 11, 2014.
’881 is related to the field of semi-automatic firearm trigger mechanisms, specifically those designed to increase the rate of fire through a binary action. In standard semi-automatic systems, a single round is discharged upon a trigger pull, and the hammer is caught by a disconnector until the trigger is released and reset. The invention addresses the limitations of prior rate-increasing devices, such as recoil-dependent stocks or complex external cranks, which often suffer from poor reliability, non-intuitive operation, or safety issues like hammer follow.
The underlying idea behind ’881 is to integrate a user-adjustable cam directly into the trigger body to selectively alter the mechanical timing of the disconnector. By rotating an external lever, the user shifts a camming surface that physically tilts the primary disconnector. This tilting action reduces the depth of the disconnector's engagement with the hammer, allowing the hammer to be released prematurely during the trigger’s return stroke—before the primary sear can catch it—thereby initiating a second discharge upon release.
The claims of ’881 focus on a trigger assembly featuring a rotatable selector cam that passes through a bore in the trigger itself, extending from the internal action to the exterior of the firearm. The independent claim specifically protects the mechanism where this selector acts directly upon a pivotal disconnector to vary its engagement with the hammer. This configuration allows the user to toggle between a standard semi-automatic mode and a binary mode where rounds are fired on both the pull and the release of the trigger.
In practice, the system utilizes a secondary disconnector to ensure the firearm remains legally and mechanically distinct from an automatic weapon. While the primary disconnector is responsible for the binary fire timing, the secondary disconnector acts as a safety catch. If the trigger is held in a partial or 'neutral' position where neither the main sear nor the primary disconnector can secure the hammer, the secondary disconnector grabs the hammer to prevent it from following the bolt forward and causing an unintentional discharge.
This implementation differs from prior art by housing the entire selection mechanism within the trigger group rather than relying on external add-ons or permanent modifications. By using a raised camming surface to precisely control disconnector geometry, the invention provides a reliable way to double the rate of fire that is compatible with common platforms like the AR-15. The result is a system that maintains a traditional manual of arms while offering a mechanical solution to firing speed that is independent of ammunition recoil or external hardware.
In the early 2010s when ’881 was filed, firearm trigger mechanisms were typically implemented using single-sear or basic disconnector arrangements designed to facilitate a one-to-one ratio between trigger cycles and firing events. At a time when increasing the rate of fire for semi-automatic systems commonly relied on external mechanical aids or recoil-based stocks rather than integrated internal fire-control groups, achieving high-cadence operation while maintaining standard safety protocols was a significant engineering challenge. Furthermore, when hardware constraints made the prevention of hammer follow non-trivial in modified trigger systems, designers were often forced to choose between increased firing rates and the mechanical reliability required to ensure the hammer remained cocked during bolt reciprocation.
The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the integration of a selectable dual-mode fire control system that enables a pull-and-release firing sequence within a standard trigger housing. The architectural shift involves the use of a selector cam to modulate the engagement depth of a primary disconnector, allowing for a controlled release of the hammer upon trigger return. A critical capability enabled by this design is the inclusion of a secondary disconnector specifically configured to intercept the hammer if the trigger is held in a central position. This structural solution overcomes the technical constraint of hammer follow, ensuring that the firearm cannot fire multiple rounds per single trigger function and maintaining mechanical synchronization between the hammer and the bolt assembly across different firing modes.
The patent contains a total of 6 claims, with claim 1 serving as the sole independent claim. This independent claim focuses on an integral device for a semi-automatic firearm that allows a user to select between a standard firing mode and a mode that fires rounds on both the pull and release of the trigger by utilizing a rotatable selector that passes through the trigger to manipulate the disconnector. The dependent claims serve to further define the mechanical components and physical interfaces of the device, specifying details such as the trigger surface geometry, the engagement features of the selector, and the use of a lever with a detent mechanism for mode selection.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents