Rechargeable battery pack

Patent No. US8673487 (titled "Rechargeable battery pack") on Dec 10, 2012. The application was issued on Mar 18, 2014.

What is this patent about?

’487 is related to the field of rechargeable battery packs for portable appliances, specifically handheld vacuum cleaners. Traditionally, these devices require either a specialized docking station for the entire appliance or a separate charging cradle for the battery once it is removed. This often necessitates multiple charging ports or complex mechanical interfaces to accommodate both on-tool and off-tool charging scenarios, increasing manufacturing costs and user complexity.

The underlying idea behind ’487 is the consolidation of the charging interface into a single charger input terminal that remains accessible regardless of the battery's physical state. By strategically positioning this port on a mounting protrusion that docks into the appliance, the inventor ensures that a standard charger plug can reach the battery cells directly. This eliminates the need for redundant internal wiring or secondary charging docks, allowing the user to plug the charger into the battery while it is still attached to the vacuum or after it has been swapped out for a fresh pack.

The claims of ’487 focus on a battery pack design featuring an upstanding protrusion that serves as both the mechanical and electrical bridge to the appliance. This protrusion houses the power interface for driving the motor and, crucially, the single charging port. The independent claims specifically protect the arrangement where the appliance’s docking portion includes an alignment aperture, which allows a charger's output terminal to pass through the appliance housing and seat directly into the battery’s recessed port.

In practice, the invention functions as a mechanical interlock system. When the battery is docked, the charging port is hidden within the appliance's handle, but the alignment aperture provides a clear path for the charger plug. A significant functional detail is that the inserted charger plug acts as a physical pin that prevents the battery from being detached while charging is in progress. This ensures electrical stability and prevents accidental disconnection during high-current charging cycles.

This approach differs from prior solutions by removing the requirement for a dedicated charging base or multiple input ports. By utilizing a recessed circular terminal located on the mounting stalk of the battery, the design achieves a streamlined form factor that supports continuous operation via spare batteries. The integration of a control PCB that generates a battery ID signal further differentiates the system, as it can electronically disable the appliance's motor while the charger is plugged in, ensuring user safety and battery longevity.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s and early 2010s when ’487 was filed, rechargeable battery systems for portable appliances were typically implemented using distinct mechanical and electrical interfaces for different charging states. At a time when systems commonly relied on specialized charging docks for standalone battery packs or separate, dedicated ports for in-situ charging, the integration of power delivery and charging logic was often bifurcated. Hardware constraints related to terminal routing and casing design made the consolidation of charging paths non-trivial, as engineers generally utilized multiple input points to manage the different physical clearances required when a battery was either isolated or mated with its host appliance.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the architectural integration of a single charger input terminal that remains accessible and functional regardless of the battery pack's connection state to an appliance. By utilizing a specific structural arrangement—where a connecting protrusion houses both the appliance power interface and a recessed charging port—the system overcomes the constraint of requiring redundant terminals or external docking hardware. This configuration enables a dual-mode charging capability through a unified electrical path, while an internal control mechanism provides a technical effect of safety interlocking by generating a battery ID signal that selectively disables appliance operation during the charging cycle.

Claims

The patent contains 16 claims in total, with claims 1, 4, and 11 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a rechargeable battery pack, a handheld vacuum cleaner, and a kit that utilize a specific charging configuration where a single input terminal located on an upstanding protrusion allows for charging both when the battery is attached to or removed from the device, including a mechanical lockout feature that prevents battery removal while the charger is plugged in. The dependent claims serve to further define specific structural components and operational constraints, such as the inclusion of logic terminals, the shape and placement of the docking aperture within a handle, the presence of locking mechanisms, and circuitry that disables the vacuum cleaner during the charging process.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Aperture
(Claim 4, Claim 11)
In a particular embodiment the docking portion may comprise an aperture which lines up with the charger input terminal on the battery pack when the battery pack is docked in the docking portion. The output terminal of a battery charger may then be inserted through the aperture in the docking portion and into the charger input terminal. In a particularly preferred embodiment the aperture may be provided in a handle of the appliance.An opening in the appliance's docking portion that aligns with the battery pack's charging port, allowing a charger to be plugged in while the pack is attached and acting as a mechanical lock.
Docking portion
(Claim 1, Claim 4, Claim 11)
In a particular embodiment the docking portion on the appliance may be a recess in a handle on the appliance. The docking portion may also further comprise a locking mechanism such as a snap fit mechanism, such that when the protrusion is inserted into the docking portion the battery pack is locked in place. One or more positive and/or negative terminals may be proved on an inner surface of the docking portion, such that when the protrusion on the battery pack is inserted into the docking portion on the appliance the power interfaces come into contact.A receiving structure or recess within the appliance, such as in the handle, that physically secures the battery pack protrusion and facilitates electrical connection.
Power interface
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
The rechargeable battery pack 1 comprises a power interface (indicated generally at 2) in the form of a positive and a negative terminal 3, 4 for transferring power from the battery pack 1 to the appliance 100 during use. In a particular embodiment the at least one power interface may be provided on a surface of the protrusion, for example on a top or a side surface of the protrusion. The terminals may be recessed into a surface of the battery pack, preferably a top surface of the protrusion.Electrical contact points, typically comprising positive and negative terminals, used to deliver stored energy from the battery pack to the appliance motor or circuitry.
Single charger input terminal
(Claim 1, Claim 4, Claim 11)
The battery pack 1 also further comprises a single charger input terminal 6 to which a battery charger is connectable for charging the battery pack 1 when the battery pack 1 is connected to the appliance 100 and when the battery pack is unattached. This battery pack 1 is therefore very advantageous as it can be charged both on and off the vacuum cleaner via the same charger input terminal 6. The charger input terminal may be located anywhere on the battery pack but preferably is in the form of a recess for accepting the output terminal of a charger.A solitary electrical port on the battery pack configured to receive a charging current from a charger output terminal regardless of whether the pack is docked in or separated from the appliance.
Upstanding protrusion
(Claim 1, Claim 4, Claim 11)
In a preferred embodiment the connecting portion may be a protrusion which may be insertable into a corresponding docking portion on the appliance. In a preferred embodiment the protrusion may be an upstanding protrusion which may extend from the top surface of the casing. The charger input terminal in a preferred embodiment may be located on the protrusion, for example on a side and/or rear surface of the protrusion.A structural extension projecting upward from the top surface of the battery pack casing designed to be received by a corresponding docking cavity in the appliance.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-01074Sep 12, 2025Hyper Ice, Inc. v. Namirsa, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US8673487

Application Number
US13709487A
Filing Date
Dec 10, 2012
Publication Date
Mar 18, 2014
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents