Patent No. US9101225 (titled "Convertible high chair") on Sep 13, 2012. The application was issued on Aug 11, 2015.
’225 is related to the field of children's high chairs, specifically those designed to adapt to a child's growth. Traditional convertible high chairs often require additional, separate base components to transform a removable seat into a standalone booster. This creates a logistical burden for parents who must store and locate extra parts to transition the chair between high chair and booster configurations.
The underlying idea behind ’225 is a self-supporting modularity that eliminates the need for auxiliary hardware. By designing the bottom of the removable infant seat to serve as both a nesting interface for the high chair and a stable, standalone base for a standard dining chair, the invention allows for an immediate transition between modes. The engineering focus is on the geometry of the contact surfaces, ensuring the infant seat is secure when stacked but remains balanced and flat when placed on a table or chair.
The claims of ’225 focus on a high chair assembly comprising a frame, a primary seat, and a secondary seat that functions as a removable insert. The independent claim specifically protects the structural configuration of the second seat’s base surface, which is dual-purposed: it must engage the first seat's surface when coupled and must be capable of resting directly on a flat support surface to maintain a stable, upright position when used independently.
In practice, the system operates as a multi-stage seating solution. The primary seat is permanently or semi-permanently attached to the frame and is dimensioned for a toddler. The secondary seat, dimensioned for an infant, nests within the toddler seat. A recessed base profile on the infant seat allows it to clear the toddler seat's crotch restraint, while non-slip pads provide friction in both the nested and standalone configurations.
This approach differs from the prior art by integrating the booster's stability directly into its own chassis rather than relying on a separate mounting base. By utilizing complimentary surface profiles between the two seats, the invention ensures a secure fit without complex mechanical adapters. Furthermore, integrated storage compartments for attachment straps ensure that all necessary components for booster mode are always on board, preventing the loss of critical safety hardware during the chair's lifecycle.
In the early 2010s when ’225 was filed, children’s seating systems were typically implemented using modular components that required secondary adapters or auxiliary base units to transition between elevated high chair frames and standard dining chairs. At a time when multi-stage seating commonly relied on separate structural interfaces to provide stability for removable booster components, hardware constraints often necessitated the use of additional hardware to bridge the gap between the contoured geometry of a primary high chair seat and the flat surface of a household chair.
The disclosed invention achieves a technical advancement through an architectural shift in the geometry of the secondary seat, integrating a self-supporting base surface that eliminates the need for external adapters. By configuring the base of the second seat with a profile that is both complementary to the primary seating surface and capable of independent stability on flat surfaces, the design overcomes the constraint of component dependency. This integration enables a secure mechanical engagement between the primary seat's lateral shoulders and the secondary seat's base, providing a stable, multi-functional seating assembly that maintains structural integrity across different support environments.
This patent contains a total of 14 claims, with claim 1 serving as the sole independent claim. The independent claim focuses on a convertible children's high chair featuring a frame and two separate child seats, where the second seat is designed to be removably coupled to the first seat or used independently as a stable seat on a flat surface. The dependent claims serve to further define the structural geometry of the seating surfaces, specify the functional roles of the seats for different age groups, and detail additional features such as non-slip pads, attachment straps, storage compartments, and locking mechanisms.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents