Patent No. US9121661 (titled "Inline hammerless percussion firing system for muzzleloader firearms") on Nov 1, 2013. The application was issued on Sep 1, 2015.
’661 is related to the field of muzzleloader firearms and, more specifically, to an inline hammerless percussion firing system. Traditional muzzleloaders often utilize exposed hammers that are susceptible to snagging on debris or clothing, which presents a significant safety risk in the field. By moving the firing mechanism internally and utilizing a linear striker rather than a pivoting hammer, the system aims to improve both the mechanical reliability and the operational safety of the firearm while maintaining the deliberate loading sequence inherent to muzzle-loading designs.
The underlying idea behind ’661 is the integration of a lost motion trigger system with a multi-stage safety sear to prevent accidental discharges caused by mechanical shocks or drops. The inventor recognized that a hammerless system requires a robust way to manage the stored energy of a compressed striker spring. By decoupling the initial trigger movement from the actual release of the sear, the design ensures that the firing pin can only advance when the trigger is intentionally and fully depressed, moving a safety segment out of a restrictive notch and into a deeper firing clearance.
The claims of ’661 focus on a firing assembly comprising a linear striker, a cocking button that compresses a striker spring, and a pivoting retainer that locks the cocking button in a forward, energized position. Central to the independent claims is the relationship between a sear—which features both a safety notch and a deeper firing notch—and a two-part trigger assembly. This assembly consists of a trigger and a trigger edge that rotate independently during an initial phase of travel, ensuring the sear remains blocked unless a specific sequence of mechanical clearance is achieved.
In practice, the shooter arms the weapon by sliding the cocking button forward, which is then held by the retainer to keep the spring under tension. The sear acts as the primary gatekeeper, physically blocking the striker's path. The lost motion operation allows the trigger edge to pivot first, shifting its top segment from a position beneath the sear's safety notch to a position beneath the deeper firing notch. Only after this clearance is established does the trigger edge make physical contact with the main trigger body to pull it away from the sear, allowing the sear to drop and release the striker.
This approach differentiates itself from prior art by providing a dedicated anti-drop safety system that is inherent to the trigger's mechanical path. If the firearm is dropped and the main trigger is jarred loose, the sear will still catch on the trigger edge’s top segment because the lost motion has not been taken up by a finger pull. Furthermore, the inclusion of a manual uncocking button and an automatic reset linked to the barrel catch ensures the firearm can be safely de-energized without needing to discharge a round, a common challenge in muzzleloader operation.
In the early 2010s when ’661 was filed, muzzleloader technology was characterized by ignition systems that largely mirrored traditional designs, at a time when firing mechanisms were typically implemented using exposed hammers that required manual cocking. While modern breech-loading firearms had long transitioned to internal firing pins to improve lock time and safety, muzzleloader architectures commonly relied on external spurs rather than enclosed strikers due to the inherent slow-loading nature of the platform, which rendered rapid-fire capabilities unnecessary. During this era, the integration of hammerless strikers into muzzle-loading systems was non-trivial because the mechanical assembly had to accommodate the unique spatial constraints of a percussion-cap ignition while mitigating the risk of accidental discharges caused by external hammers catching on environmental obstructions.
The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the architectural shift from an exposed hammer to an inline hammerless percussion system specifically adapted for the loading constraints of a muzzleloader. The advancement is achieved by a multi-stage mechanical integration comprising a cocking button that compresses a striker spring, a pivotable retainer that secures the cocking button in a forward firing position, and a specialized lost-motion trigger system. This lost-motion mechanism enables a dual-stage safety function where a trigger edge must pivot relative to the trigger to move from a safety notch to a deeper firing notch in the sear before the striker can be released. This configuration overcomes the technical constraint of accidental discharge inherent in external hammer designs while providing a regulated sear release force, thereby enhancing both the mechanical safety and the firing precision of the muzzleloader platform.
This patent contains 17 claims, with claims 1, 7, 10, and 14 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on the mechanical configuration and operation of an inline hammerless percussion firing system for muzzleloader firearms, specifically detailing a striker assembly, a cocking button for spring compression, and a trigger system featuring a pivotable sear and lost motion functionality to transition between safety and firing states. The dependent claims provide additional technical refinements, such as specific cocking button locking mechanisms, uncocking features, trigger pressure adjustment screws, and safety pin configurations to further regulate the firing sequence.
Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.
US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.
Get instant alerts for new documents