Method and system for a high capacity cable network

Patent No. US9178765 (titled "Method and system for a high capacity cable network") on Jul 23, 2013. The application was issued on Nov 3, 2015.

What is this patent about?

’765 is related to the field of cable and DOCSIS networks, specifically focusing on optimizing data throughput and reliability in Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) systems. In traditional cable environments, fixed transmission parameters often fail to account for the varying signal conditions experienced by different modems across a wide frequency spectrum, leading to bandwidth inefficiencies or connection drops for remote users.

The underlying idea behind ’765 is the dynamic optimization of the physical layer by tailoring transmission parameters to the specific signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) profile of individual modems or subcarrier groups. By treating the OFDM subcarrier grid as a flexible resource, the system can push higher data rates to modems with clean signals while simultaneously ensuring that modems in high-noise environments remain connected through more robust modulation and error correction schemes.

The claims of ’765 focus on a CMTS that manages a service group by intentionally selecting physical layer parameters that may exceed the reception capabilities of a subset of modems. To maintain overall network efficiency, the system broadcasts data at a high threshold and then utilizes targeted retransmission—via unicast or multicast—to deliver missing or corrupted packet contents to those specific modems that could not decode the high-speed broadcast.

In practice, the invention implements a sophisticated balancing act between throughput and reach. It utilizes hierarchical modulation to split data into high-priority and low-priority streams; for instance, critical control data is mapped to the most robust bits of a constellation, while less sensitive data occupies the higher-order bits. This allows the CMTS to serve a diverse population of modems on the same frequency block without defaulting to the lowest common denominator of performance.

This approach differs from prior solutions by moving away from rigid, worst-case scenario configurations that typically throttle the entire network to accommodate the weakest link. By employing cross-subcarrier parity and frequency-selective parameter tuning, the system effectively harvests excess capacity from high-quality channels to compensate for deficits in noisy ones, resulting in a significantly higher aggregate capacity for the television and data network.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the early 2010s when ’765 was filed, cable and Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) networks were typically implemented using fixed-capacity architectures that relied on static channel allocations. At a time when systems commonly relied on rigid physical layer configurations rather than dynamic, high-capacity modulation schemes, hardware and software constraints made the efficient scaling of bandwidth across wide area networks non-trivial. Engineering practices during this era were often limited by the spectral efficiency of existing modulation techniques, which frequently resulted in network congestion as data demands increased relative to the fixed throughput capabilities of standard cable infrastructure.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention addresses the technical problem of insufficient capacity and spectral inefficiency in conventional cable networks through an architectural shift toward high-capacity data handling. By integrating advanced signal processing and management techniques within the DOCSIS framework, the system enables a significant increase in throughput and network density. This technical advancement is achieved by optimizing the physical and data link layers to overcome the constraints of traditional fixed-bandwidth systems, resulting in a more scalable and efficient communication infrastructure capable of supporting higher data rates across the wide area network.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 22 claims, with claims 1, 11, 21, and 22 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on methods and systems for managing communications in a cable modem termination system using orthogonal frequency division multiplexed subcarriers, specifically by determining performance metrics for individual modems to select physical layer parameters, managing packet retransmissions to specific modem subsets, and implementing hierarchical modulation based on performance metric variations across the service group. The dependent claims serve to further specify the performance metrics as signal-to-noise ratio profiles, define the types of physical layer parameters used, and detail the technical implementation of hierarchical modulation, parity bit transmission, and message reconstruction techniques.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Hierarchical modulation
(Claim 21, Claim 22)
Hierarchical modulation may be used to transmit more significant bits (MSBs) and less significant bits (LSBs) in a single symbol. The MSBs may be decodable by modems with lower performance metrics, while both MSBs and LSBs may be decodable by modems with higher performance metrics. This allows for more efficient use of the spectrum when modems in a service group have diverse channel conditions.A modulation technique where multiple data streams (e.g., more significant bits and less significant bits) are multiplexed into a single symbol, allowing different levels of robustness for different modems.
More significant bits
(Claim 22)
In hierarchical modulation, the more significant bits (MSBs) are typically more robust to noise and interference than the less significant bits (LSBs). The MSBs may be transmitted on subcarriers where some modems have a relatively-low value of a performance metric. This ensures that even modems with poor channel conditions can receive at least the high-priority or basic data represented by the MSBs.The portion of a hierarchically modulated symbol that is mapped to higher-power or more widely spaced constellation points to ensure successful reception by devices with lower signal quality.
Performance metric
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 21, Claim 22)
The performance metric may be, for example, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), and/or bit error rate (BER). The CMTS 102 may determine a value of the performance metric for each subcarrier of each modem. These values may be used to select physical layer parameters such as modulation order and forward error correction (FEC) rate.A measured value representing the quality or characteristics of a communication channel for a specific cable modem on a specific OFDM subcarrier, used to determine modulation and coding parameters.
Physical layer parameters
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
Physical layer parameters may include, for example, a modulation order (e.g., number of points in a QAM constellation) and/or a forward error correction (FEC) code rate. The CMTS 102 may select these parameters for each subcarrier based on the performance metric values. This allows the CMTS to optimize the data rate for the channel conditions experienced by the modems.Configuration settings for the PHY level of the OSI model, specifically modulation schemes and coding rates, selected based on channel conditions.
Service group
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
The plurality of cable modems 104a-104d may belong to a single service group. A service group may be defined by the set of modems that can receive a particular set of downstream channels or subcarriers. The CMTS may broadcast packets to all modems within this specific service group.A logical grouping of cable modems that receive the same downstream signals from a Cable Modem Termination System (CMTS).

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:25-cv-07969Aug 23, 2025Entropic Communications, Llc V. Comcast Corporation

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9178765

Application Number
US13948401A
Filing Date
Jul 23, 2013
Publication Date
Nov 3, 2015
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents