Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list having limited user control

Patent No. US9215613 (titled "Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list having limited user control") on Apr 13, 2015. The application was issued on Dec 15, 2015.

What is this patent about?

’613 is related to the field of wireless network management and device-assisted traffic control. As mobile devices increasingly utilize both wireless wide-area networks (WWAN) and wireless local-area networks (WLAN), the demand for data often outpaces network capacity. This creates a need for intelligent systems that can distinguish between critical user-facing tasks and background data consumption to prevent network congestion and manage service costs effectively.

The underlying idea behind ’613 is to implement a device-side traffic management system that dynamically regulates network access based on the operational state of an application and the specific type of network connection. By distinguishing between applications in the user interface foreground and those performing background tasks, the device can apply specific policies that prioritize active user sessions while restricting or deferring background data transfers that might otherwise tax a congested cellular network.

The claims of ’613 focus on a wireless end-user device equipped with both WWAN and WLAN modems that utilizes a differential traffic control policy list. This list categorizes applications into distinct groups, allowing the device to apply specific traffic rules to a first set of applications while exempting a second set. The system specifically monitors whether an application is interacting with the user in the foreground and uses this classification, along with the current network type, to selectively allow or deny Internet service activities.

In practice, the invention works by employing a processor to classify the current network connection and the state of resident applications. A key feature is the user interface that allows a subscriber to augment the differential traffic control policy for specific controlled applications, providing a level of manual override that does not extend to essential system services. This ensures that while the network provider can manage capacity, the user retains some agency over which background apps are permitted to consume data.

This approach differs from prior solutions by moving the intelligence from the core network to the end-user device, avoiding the limitations of centralized Deep Packet Inspection (DPI). By managing traffic at the source, the system can block or throttle background service activities before they consume expensive over-the-air spectrum. Unlike traditional methods that treat all data equally, this invention creates a more granular, state-aware control mechanism that balances network health with a responsive user experience.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the mid-2010s when ’613 was filed, wireless access networks were increasingly strained by the proliferation of general-purpose mobile computing devices at a time when network capacity was typically managed through centralized core-network planning and investment. When systems commonly relied on purely network-side traffic management, such as Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) at a gateway, the signaling overhead required to establish radio access bearers and data sessions often consumed significant resources even if the resulting data transfer was ultimately blocked or throttled. Furthermore, when hardware and software constraints made it non-trivial to coordinate device-side power states with network-side congestion levels, frequent transitions between active and idle modes by background applications created a disproportionate signaling load that could degrade overall network availability independently of aggregate data throughput.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement through the integration of device-assisted service (DAS) monitoring with dynamic, context-aware traffic control policies to protect network capacity. By shifting the architectural focus from centralized network blocking to device-side classification and control, the system enables the differential management of network service usage activities—such as background synchronization, software updates, and persistent signaling—based on the real-time busy state of the specific network edge element serving the device. This approach achieves a technical effect of reducing unnecessary over-the-air signaling and resource consumption before they reach the radio access network, thereby overcoming the constraint of 'signaling storms' caused by applications unaware of network congestion. The invention further enables a capability for granular, application-specific control that can be dynamically adjusted based on service plans, time-of-day, or user interaction, ensuring that critical real-time services are prioritized while background tasks are deferred to periods of higher network availability.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 24 claims, with claim 1 serving as the sole independent claim. This independent claim focuses on a wireless end-user device equipped with multiple modems and a processor configured to manage data traffic by classifying network types and determining whether specific applications are actively interacting with a user in the foreground. The device utilizes a differential traffic control policy that allows for user-defined modifications to restrict or permit internet activities based on these classifications and the specific application type. The dependent claims serve to further define the operational parameters of the traffic control system, specifying conditions for denying background data on wide area networks, detailing various network types such as roaming or home connections, and outlining how device states like power levels or user interface priority influence the dynamic application of these traffic policies.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Classify a wireless network
(Claim 1)
A QoS service control policy is adapted as a function of the type of network the device is connected to. The policies can be different when the device is connected to a wireless network (e.g., 3G/4G) than when connected to a wired or different wireless network (e.g., WiFi). This allows for encouraging certain behavior, such as sending low QoS traffic when on a certain type of network as opposed to another.The process of identifying the specific type of network connection (e.g., WWAN/cellular vs. WLAN/Wi-Fi) to determine which differential traffic policies should be active based on the network's capacity or cost.
Differential traffic control policy list
(Claim 1)
The network capacity controlled services list includes network capacity controlled services, non-network capacity controlled services, and an unclassified set of services. In some embodiments, the network capacity controlled services list is static, adaptive, generated using a service processor, or received from a network element. This list identifies service activities that have a launch control or network protection policy in effect.A stored data structure that categorizes applications and services into different groups (e.g., a first group versus a second group) to enable the application of distinct network access rules based on their identity or classification.
Internet service activities
(Claim 1)
Examples of a network service usage activity include a voice connection, device application or widget connection, device OS function connection, email text connection, software update, or device backup connection. These activities include any activity by the device that includes wireless network communication. They may be generated by an application, an operating system (OS), and/or other device function.Data communication events generated by applications, operating system functions, or device processes that require a connection to a network, such as background signaling, data synchronization, or content downloads.
Network types
(Claim 1)
A service control policy is adapted as a function of the type of network the device is connected to. For example, the policies can be different when the device is connected to a wireless wide area network (e.g., a 3G/4G network) than when the device is connected to a wireless local area network (e.g., WiFi). The device service processor and the service controller coordinate to adapt the service control policies to be different depending on which network the device is connected to.Different wireless access technologies or connection categories, such as WWAN (cellular) versus WLAN (Wi-Fi), which trigger different control policies.
User augmentation
(Claim 1)
In some embodiments, a UI is provided that also informs the user when there are options to set, control, override, or modify service usage controls for the purpose of protecting network capacity. The user chooses from a set of service restrictions rather than simply blocking or allowing service activity launch. A portion of the list may be pre-programmed by the user in accordance with user preference for controlling usage of service activities.The ability for a user to modify, override, or add preferences to a pre-defined traffic control policy, specifically for a subset of applications identified by the system.
User interface foreground
(Claim 1)
Classification rules can include examining if service usage activity UI content is in the foreground of the device UI. This helps determine if the particular service usage activity fits a set of classification rules that define it as a background service usage activity. It distinguishes when a user is directly interacting with or benefiting from an application versus when it is running in the background.The state in which an application is actively interacting with the user or displaying content as the primary focus on the device screen, used as a criterion to distinguish between active user-driven traffic and background traffic.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
4:25-cv-09558Nov 5, 2025Google LLC v. Headwater Research LLC

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9215613

Application Number
US14685511A
Filing Date
Apr 13, 2015
Publication Date
Dec 15, 2015
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents