Mobile device mode enablement responsive to a proximity criterion

Patent No. US9462411 (titled "Mobile device mode enablement responsive to a proximity criterion") on Nov 4, 2008. The application was issued on Oct 4, 2016.

What is this patent about?

’411 is related to the field of adaptive mobile communications and context-aware device configuration. Specifically, it addresses the inherent rigidity of mobile devices that typically maintain the same functional state regardless of their environment. The background context involves the need for devices to dynamically enable or disable specific communication modes or software functions—such as digital wallets or specialized network protocols—based on real-world triggers like location, time, or the presence of specific nearby objects.

The underlying idea behind ’411 is that a mobile device should act as a context-sensitive gateway that only activates high-stakes or specialized functions when a specific environmental and biological state is met. Rather than relying solely on manual user input, the invention uses a multi-factor trigger mechanism that combines external proximity with internal physiological data. This ensures that a specific communication mode is not just available because the user is in the right place, but also because a sensed biological condition confirms the appropriateness or necessity of the action.

The claims of ’411 focus on a smartphone that utilizes an integrated sensor to monitor physiological data from a living organism while simultaneously evaluating a proximity criterion relative to an external entity. The independent claims require that the device selectively enables a specific air interface protocol only when both the proximity test and a physiological threshold are satisfied. If the biological data does not meet the required criterion, the device is programmed to refrain from using that specific communication path, even if the device is physically near the target entity.

In practice, the system functions as a sophisticated conditional gatekeeper for wireless traffic. The smartphone monitors parameters such as heart rate or blood pressure alongside its physical location or distance from a beacon. When the device detects it is near a specific entity—such as a point-of-sale terminal or a vehicle—it evaluates the biological input to decide whether to switch from a standard cellular connection to a specialized first air interface. This allows the device to autonomously manage complex tasks, like authorizing a financial transaction or establishing a secure data link, only under the correct physiological and environmental circumstances.

This approach differs from prior solutions by moving beyond simple geofencing or proximity-based triggers. Traditional systems typically activate functions based on location alone, which can lead to accidental triggers or security vulnerabilities. By requiring a biometric or physiological handshake as a prerequisite for activating a specific air interface, the invention provides a more nuanced and secure method of device adaptation. It effectively transforms the smartphone from a static tool into a responsive agent that synchronizes its communication capabilities with the physical and biological state of the user.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’411 was filed, mobile wireless devices were typically implemented as multi-functional terminals that maintained a static set of enabled features regardless of their immediate physical environment. At a time when systems commonly relied on manual user configuration or persistent background processes to manage application states, hardware and software constraints made the dynamic, context-aware activation of specific communication protocols non-trivial. During this era, mobile devices generally operated with a fixed set of active air interfaces, where the transition between different functional modes—such as switching from a general-purpose communication state to a specialized transactional or localized state—required explicit user intervention rather than autonomous environmental sensing.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention addresses the technical problem of functional rigidity in mobile devices by introducing an architectural shift toward adaptive enablement based on proximity criteria. The technical advancement lies in the integration of a proximity-sensing layer that triggers the selective activation or deactivation of specific communication modes, such as localized air interface protocols or transactional functions, only when a defined spatial or temporal condition is met. This structural solution achieves the technical effect of optimizing device resources and enhancing security by ensuring that specialized capabilities, like electronic payment or vehicle-specific telemetry, are only operational when the device is within a verified range of a target entity. By enabling a master-slave relationship between devices and utilizing environmental parameters to switch between disparate air interface protocols, the system overcomes the constraint of static device configuration.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 4 claims, with claims 1 and 3 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a smartphone-based system and method for managing wireless communications across multiple air interfaces based on the dual conditions of detecting proximity to an external entity and sensing specific physiological data from a living organism. The dependent claims serve to further define the proximity parameters, specifically specifying a distance threshold of less than 10 meters for the interaction between the smartphone and the entity.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
First air interface
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
The wireless communications device may be configured to selectively and/or preferentially enable a first communications mode that uses, for example, a first air interface protocol and a first set of frequencies to communicate information wirelessly. In some embodiments, the first communications mode may comprise an air interface protocol, such as, for example, an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexed and/or an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDM/OFDMA) protocol, a WiFi- and/or WiMAX-based air interface protocol.A specific wireless communication protocol and/or frequency set (such as WiFi or WiMAX) that is selectively enabled or preferred based on proximity and physiological data.
Physiological data
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
The “at least one other parameter” may, for example, be a blood pressure, a heart rate, a blood content, a physiological state, a psychological state, etc. The wireless communications device may be configured to selectively enable the first communications mode/function responsive to the outcome of the comparison and/or responsive to a value of another parameter, such as, for example, a value associated with the “at least one other parameter” list.Biological metrics or states associated with a living organism, such as heart rate or blood pressure, used as a condition for enabling specific communication modes.
Proximity criterion
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
Determining whether the proximity criterion is satisfied comprises determining by the mobile device and/or by the one or more systems of a location associated with the mobile device. In other embodiments, the determining may be based upon the mobile device detecting a signal that is being radiated by a device that is attached to and/or is installed in/on an entity. The signal may be detected only over a relatively small distance, for example, less than 100 meters or less than 10 meters.A condition satisfied when the device is within a specific distance of an entity or location, determined via signal detection or location processing.
Second air interface
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
The first communications mode may comprise a first air interface protocol and a first set of frequencies for transmission/reception of information and the second communications mode may comprise a second air interface protocol, that may be different from the first air interface protocol, and/or a second set of frequencies. The device may disable the first communications mode and/or enable the second communications mode after the wireless communications device determines that the comparison of position, the value of the quantity/parameter and/or the event no longer satisfies the threshold criterion.A wireless communication protocol or frequency set distinct from the first air interface, which the device uses when the specific criteria for the first interface are not met.
Smartphone-based sensor
(Claim 1, Claim 3)
The wireless communications device may be configured to estimate its location and the value of the “at least one other parameter” by using other means and/or sensors that may, according to some embodiments, be device-based. The “at least one other parameter” may, for example, be a blood pressure, a heart rate, a blood content, a physiological state, a psychological state, etc.A sensor integrated into or used by a mobile device to estimate environmental or biological parameters, specifically configured to detect physiological states of a living organism.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05041Jun 13, 2025Telcom Ventures LLC v. Apple, Inc.
1:24-cv-23837Oct 4, 2024Telcom Ventures Llc V. Apple, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9462411

Application Number
US12264711A
Filing Date
Nov 4, 2008
Publication Date
Oct 4, 2016
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents