Mobile device mode enablement responsive to a proximity criterion

Patent No. US9832708 (titled "Mobile device mode enablement responsive to a proximity criterion") on Aug 30, 2016. The application was issued on Nov 28, 2017.

What is this patent about?

’708 is related to the field of adaptive mobile device configuration and proximity-based service enablement. It addresses the inherent rigidity of mobile devices that typically maintain the same functional state regardless of their physical environment. The background context involves the need for devices to dynamically activate specific capabilities—such as digital wallet or transaction functions—only when they are relevant to the user's immediate surroundings, thereby improving security and operational efficiency.

The underlying idea behind ’708 is the use of a dual-interface architecture to trigger localized functions without interrupting wide-area connectivity. The system relies on a proximity criterion to detect when a mobile device is near a specific entity, such as a toll booth or a point-of-sale terminal. By utilizing a secondary, short-range air interface for these localized interactions, the device can transition into a specialized mode—like a payment tool—only when physically necessary, while simultaneously maintaining a primary connection for standard communication services.

The claims of ’708 focus on a smartphone that concurrently manages two distinct air interfaces to facilitate location-aware interactions. The independent claims describe a method where the device communicates with a local entity via a short-range link (such as a point-to-point time division duplex protocol) only when a proximity threshold is met, while simultaneously receiving wide-area communication services from a base station via a different air interface. Crucially, the local entity providing the proximity-based information is not the provider of the primary communication service.

In practice, the invention functions by monitoring environmental triggers such as signal strength, GPS coordinates, or specific beacon identifiers to satisfy the proximity logic. Once the device is within range, it enables a specific functional mode, such as a financial transaction module, to exchange data with the local entity. This allows a user to approach a checkout counter or toll gate and have their device automatically provision the necessary payment credentials or data packets without manual intervention or loss of cellular connectivity.

This approach differs from prior solutions by emphasizing the concurrent operation of disparate air interfaces for localized task execution. Unlike traditional systems that might require a device to switch entirely to a local network or remain in a static state, this invention ensures that the short-range interaction is a transient, context-aware overlay. By refraining from using the local interface until the proximity criterion is satisfied, the system conserves power and enhances security by keeping sensitive transaction modes dormant until they are physically required.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’708 was filed, mobile device functionality was typically implemented using static configurations where a handset maintained a uniform set of active features regardless of its physical environment. At a time when systems commonly relied on manual user intervention to toggle specific hardware modes or software applications, the integration of real-time environmental sensors with core communication protocols was limited. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the autonomous, context-aware activation of specialized functions—such as mobile payment modules or localized air interface protocols—non-trivial due to the processing overhead required for continuous proximity monitoring and the lack of standardized frameworks for device-to-entity interaction.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement through an architectural shift toward adaptive mode enablement based on proximity criteria. By integrating location-based data, such as GPS coordinates or short-range signal detection, with a device’s operational logic, the system enables the dynamic activation or deactivation of specific communication modes and functional identities. This solution addresses the technical problem of device rigidity by allowing a mobile terminal to transition between general-purpose states and specialized roles—such as a secure payment wallet or a vehicle-linked transponder—only when specific spatial or temporal conditions are met. The resulting technical effect is an increase in operational efficiency and security, as high-value or power-intensive functions are enabled exclusively within relevant contexts, thereby overcoming the constraints of static device configuration.

Claims

This patent contains 19 claims, with claims 1, 11, 16, and 18 being independent. The independent claims focus on a smartphone and a method for its operation that utilizes two distinct air interfaces concurrently, where a first short-range interface provides information to a nearby entity based on a proximity criterion while a second interface receives communication services from a separate base station or network. The dependent claims serve to further define the proximity parameters, specify the use of time division duplex protocols and point-to-point links, detail the exchange of identity information to enable specific functions, and describe the interaction with additional devices or the provision of notifications upon signal reception.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Communications service
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 16, Claim 18)
The smartphone may receive service from one or more systems, such as a cellular and/or satellite radiotelephone system. This service is provided via a second air interface and is distinct from the localized functions enabled by proximity to an entity. The entity itself is not involved in providing this communications service to the smartphone.The primary network-provided data or voice connectivity (e.g., cellular or satellite) received from a base station, which operates independently of the localized entity interaction.
First air interface
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 16, Claim 18)
The first communications mode may use a first air interface protocol and a first set of frequencies to communicate information wirelessly. Examples include an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexed (OFDM/OFDMA) protocol or a WiFi- and/or WiMAX-based air interface protocol. It may be based upon Time Division Duplex (TDD) operation where a common set of frequencies are used bi-directionally.A specific wireless communication protocol and frequency set used for short-range, point-to-point interaction with an entity, distinct from the primary service provider's interface.
Proximity criterion
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 16, Claim 18)
Determining whether the proximity criterion is satisfied may comprise determining a location associated with the mobile device or detecting a signal radiated by a device associated with an entity. This may involve processing GPS signals to determine position, velocity, or time, or detecting a low-power signal radiated over a relatively small distance, such as less than 100 meters. The criterion is used to adaptively enable one or more modes or functions of a device.A condition or threshold based on geographic location, distance, or signal detection that must be met to trigger the enablement of a specific communication mode or function.
Short-range link
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 16, Claim 18)
The signal may be radiated at a relatively low power level so that it may be detected only over a relatively small distance, such as less than 10 meters. This link may be a short-range communications link established with an entity like a shopping cart or a motor vehicle. It allows for the transfer of information such as price, identity, or toll collection data.A direct, localized wireless connection established between the smartphone and a nearby entity for specific data exchange, such as transaction or identification information.
Time division duplex protocol
(Claim 16, Claim 18)
The first communications mode may be based upon Time Division Duplex (TDD) operation. In this operation, a common set of frequencies are used bi-directionally (at different times) to provide uplink and downlink communications. This protocol can be used in conjunction with WiFi- or WiMAX-based air interfaces.A communication method where uplink and downlink transmissions occur on the same frequency band but at different, non-overlapping time slots.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05041Jun 13, 2025Telcom Ventures LLC v. Apple, Inc.
1:24-cv-23837Oct 4, 2024Telcom Ventures Llc V. Apple, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9832708

Application Number
US15251882A
Filing Date
Aug 30, 2016
Publication Date
Nov 28, 2017
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents