Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. et al. vs Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc.

Termination Decision: Pre-DI dismissal

Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 37 C.F.R. �� 42.71(a)

Exhibit 3002

ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding 37 C.F.R �� 42.5(a)

Ex. 3001

PATENT OWNER'S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE UNDER 37 C.F.R. ��42.107

Declaration of Dr. Muriel M��dard, Sc.D. (���M��dard���)

Curriculum Vitae of M��dard

Email from counsel for Verizon Comm���ns., Inc. to counsel for Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. (Patent Owner) dated Mar. 16, 2021, serving Rebuttal Expert Report of Paul Prucnal, Ph.D.

Rebuttal Expert Report of Paul Prucnal, Ph.D. regarding the Validity of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,121,111 and 8,983,288 dated March 15, 2021 (Redacted) (���Prucnal���)

Andreas Alpert, Jitter and Wander Testing in High-Speed Telecom Networks, International Timing & Sync Forum (ITSF) 2006, produced as bates stamp number VZ-HWEDTX- 1248237 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al.

Excerpts from Khurram Kazi, Optical Networking standards: A Comprehensive Guide for Professionals, Springer (2006), produced as bates stamp number VZ-HWEDTX- 0009061 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al.

ITU, Optical Transport Network (OTN) Tutorial (2004) produced as bates stamp number VZ-HWEDTX-0099577 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm���ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030 (E.D. Tex.)

Geoff Garner, ITU-T addresses OTN, Lightwave (Feb. 1,2002) produced as bates stamp number VZ-HW-EDTX-1248284 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030 (E.D. Tex.)

Sanjay Yadav, Why Synchronization is not required in OTN (Optical Transport Network)?, Mapyourtech.com (June 24,2014) produced as bates stamp number VZ-HW-EDTX- 1248299 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns,Inc. et al.

Forum Post, Need Explanation: OTN network does not require clock synchronization, www.forum.huawei.com (May 2014) produced as bates stamp number VZ-HWEDTX- 1248297 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al.

Maarten Vissers, Timing over OTN, email to ITU-T list serve, produced as bates stamp number VZ-HW-EDTX-0199390 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030 (E.D. Tex.)

Verizon Invention Disclosure Form for Latency measurement of ITU-T G.709 wrapped circuits dated Nov. 10, 2006, produced as bates stamp number VZ-HW-EDTX- 1248000 in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030 (E.D. Tex.)

Excerpts from the deposition of Michael B. Freiberger dated January 8, 2021, in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030 (E.D. Tex.)

ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector, Study Group 15 ��� Contribution 472, Requirement of Embedded Latency Measurement in OTN Networks, (September 2009) produced as bates stamp number VZ-HW-EDTZ-0200256

Verizon Business Network Services LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01278, Pap. 12, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Jan. 26, 2021)

Verizon Business Network Services LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01290, Pap. 14, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Jan. 25, 2021)

Verizon Business Network Services LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01291, Pap. 13, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Jan. 25, 2021)

Verizon Business Network Services LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01292, Pap. 13, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Jan. 25, 2021)

Cellco Partnership d/b/a/ Verizon Wireless v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01352, Pap. 13, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Mar. 5, 2021)

Cellco Partnership d/b/a/ Verizon Wireless v. Huawei Tech. Co. Ltd., IPR2020-01356, Pap. 13, Decision Denying Institution on Fintiv Grounds (Mar. 5, 2021)

Printout of the docket for Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., No. 2:20-CV-00030 (as of July 1, 2021) (E.D. Tex.)

Printout of the docket for Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., No. 2:20-CV-00030 (as of July 1, 2021) (E.D. Tex.)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030, Dkt. 23, Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim against Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2020)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-cv-00030-JRG, Dkt. 63, Redacted First Amended Answer and Counterclaims by Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2020)

Email stipulation sent by counsel for Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. (Patent Owner) in Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-cv-00030-JRG

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc., Case No. 2:20-cv-00030-JRG, Dkt. 162, Claim Construction Memorandum and Order (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2021)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-CV-00030, Dkt. 1, Original Complaint (E.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2020)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 2:20-cv-00030-JRG, Dkt. 27, First Amended Complaint (E.D. Tex. April 21, 2020)

Printout of the docket for Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd et al. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 6:20-cv-00090 (W.D. Tex.) (as of July 1, 2021)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd et al. v. Verizon Comm���ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 6:20-cv-00090, Dkt. 1, Original Complaint (W.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2020)

Huawei Tech. Co., Ltd et al. v. Verizon Comm'ns, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 6:20-cv-00090, Dkt. 75, Verizon���s First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (W.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2021)

Bertsekas et al., DATA NETWORKS, Chapter 1 (Prentice Hall, 2d ed. 1992)

P. Littlewood, OTN vs SONET/SDH: Comparing the Differences, (available online at https://www.ciena.com/insights/articles/OTN-vs-SONETSDH-Comparing-the-differences-prx.html)

Microsemi, Optical Transport Network (available online at https://www.microsemi.com/documentportal/doc_view/126355-timing-otn-overview)

Hanbali et al., A survey of TCP over ad hoc networks, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS & TUTORIALS, vol. 7, no. 3 (2005)

Rubinstein et al., A Survey on Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING, vol. 211 (2006)

Nishioka et al., Performance Evaluations On IP/OTN Integrated Networks, 4th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, Chiba, Japan (2001)

Excerpts from Stamatios V. Kartalopoulos, NGS over DWDM, OTN over DWDM, and Experimental Networks, NEXT GENERATION SONET/SDH (2004)

ITU-T Recommendation G.707/Y.1322: Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)(available online at https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.707-200312-S/en)

Antonova et al., A Universal Simulation Model for SONET/SDH Synchronization Networks, PROCEEDINGS OF COM'96, FIRST ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS IN COMMUNICATIONS (1996)

ITU-T Recommendation G.813: Timing characteristics of SDH equipment slave clocks (SEC) (available online at https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.813/en)

Crossett et al., SONET/SDH Network Synchronization And Synchronization Sources, [Conference Record] GLOBECOM '92 - COMMUNICATIONS FOR GLOBAL USERS: IEEE, vol. 2 (1992)

ITU-T Recommendation G.872: Architecture of optical transport networks (available online at https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.872-200111-S/en)

Klein et al., Network Synchronization - A Challenge for SDH/SONET?, IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE (Sept.1993)

Klein et al., SONET/SDH Pointer Processor Implementations, 1993 IEEE GLOBECOM, vol. 1 (1994)

Declaration of Andrew J. Sutton in support of Patent Owner's Preliminary Response

POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC.

PATENT OWNER'S MANDATORY NOTICES PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. �� 42.8

Notice of Accord Filing Date

U.S. Patent No. 8,121,111

File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,121,111

EP Publication No. 1601124_Massimiliano

ITU-T Recommendation G.709/Y.1331

U.S. Publication No. 2004/0076151_Fant

IPR2020-01292 Petition

IPR2020-01292 ITU-T List of Recommendations

IPR2020-01292 ITU-T Recommendation G.709/Y.1331

G.709_Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network

Affidavit of Duncan Hall

U.S. Patent No. 7,710,864_Binetti

U.S. Publication No. 2006/0228115_Binetti

U.S. Publication No. 2003/0115321_Edmison

U.S. Patent No. 6,477,181_Fujimori

IPR2020-01278_POPR

IPR2020-01079_POPR

Declaration of Paul S. Min

Verizon Opening Claim Construction Brief

Huawei Response Claim Construction Brief

Declaration of Dr. Jose Luis Melendez

Verizon Reply Claim Construction Brief

Claim Construction Memorandum

ITU-T Recommendation G.871/Y.1301

G.871_Framework of Optical Transport Network

U.S. Patent No. 7,206,288_Cometto

Declaration of Gordon MacPherson

U.S. Patent No. 6,717,917_Weissberger

U.S. Patent No. 7,184,423_Bryan

U.S. Publication No. 2009/0003295_Iwao

U.S. Patent No. 7,522,628_Elliott

U.S. Publication No. 2006/0117113_Elliott

U.S. Patent No. 7,535,931_Zampetti

U.S. Patent No. 7,577,169_Dinh

U.S. Publication No. 2002/0021717_Hedayat

U.S. Patent No. 8,332,867_Gotz

U.S. Patent No. 7,359,408_Kim

U.S. Publication No. 2005/0058081_Elliott

U.S. Publication No. 2008/0151941_Ghodrat

U.S. Patent No. 7,286,487_Perkins

IPR2020-01292_ ITU web site

Tech Titans Strike Chord with Judge on PTAB Denials Suit

Declaration of Crena Pacheco

Email regarding Stipulation

Declaration of George Rouskas, Ph.D.

Petitioners Power of Attorney

Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,121,111