VIZIO, Inc. vs Maxell, Ltd.

Notice: refund approved

Petitioner's Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fee

Termination Decision: Post-DI Settlement

JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT 7,730,507 UNDER 37 C.F.R. 42.72

JOINT MOTION TO KEEP CONFIDENTIAL AND SEPARATE UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 317(B) AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(C)

IPR2022-01459 Exhibit 1031

Joint Stipulation to Modify Due Date 1 of the Scheduling Order

ORDER Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Tariq Javed 37 C.F.R. sec 42.10

Joint Stipulation to Modify Due Date 1 and 2 of the Scheduling Order

Patent Owner's Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Tariq Javed Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)

Ex. 2004 - Declaration of Tariq Javed in Support of Patent Owner's Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Tariq Javed Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)

Patent Owner's Notice of Deposition of Dr. Andrew Wolfe

Patent Owner's Objections to Evidence

Institution Decision: DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314

Order: SCHEDULING ORDER

Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,730,507

Ex. 2001 - (-06758) 2022.12.21 [158] Final Rulings Claim Construction

Ex. 2002 - (-06758) 2022.12.28 [162] Schedule

Ex. 2003 - VIZIO's Corrected Invalidity Contentions

Notice: Notice filing date accorded

Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices

Power of Attorney for Patent Owner

PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,730,507 CHALLENGING CLAIMS 1, 2, 8 10, AND 13

U.S. Patent No. 7,730,507 (the 507 Patent)

Prosecution History for U.S. Patent No. 7,730,507 (downloaded from PAIR)

Part 1 - Declaration of Dr. Andrew Wolfe

Part 2 - Declaration of Dr. Andrew Wolfe

Challenged Claim Listing With Limitation Designations

Proof of Service in Maxell, Ltd. et al v. VIZIO, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-06758-GW-DFMx (C.D. Cal.)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0223404 (Ishiguro)

U.S. Patent No. 7,558,977 (Kim 977)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0094036 (Tichelaar)

U.S. Patent No. 6,462,437 (Marmaropoulos)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0229226 (Relan)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0024616 (Kim 616)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0046833 (Kitamura)

U.S. Patent No. 7,068,732 (Tamayama)

U.S. Patent No. 6,636,026 (Nomoto)

U.S. Patent No. 7,334,132 (Kumar et al.)

Ole Steinfatt, Peter Klapproth and Hans Tichelaar, TCP: A Next Generation for TV Control Processing, ICCE 1999, THPM 19.5, pp. 354-355, Los Angeles USA, June 1999) (Steinfatt)

U.S. Patent No. 6,252,907 (Hwang)

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2001/0013856 (Hamakada et al.)

U.S. Patent No. 6,768,520 (Rilly et al.)

U.S. Patent No. 6,209,044 (Vaughan)

U.S. Patent No. 7,725,749 (Mitarai)

U.S. Patent No. 5,990,958 (Bheda et al.)

U.S. Patent No. 7,411,631 (Joshi et al.)

Prosecution History for U.S. Patent App. No. 12/788,892 (downloaded from PAIR)

Prosecution History for U.S. Patent App. No. 13/160,542 (downloaded from PAIR)

VIZIO, Inc.���s Preliminary Claim Constructions And Extrinsic Evidence (August 18, 2022)

Maxell Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence, Ex. A (August 18, 2022)

Central District of California Case Milestone Timelines

Maxell, Ltd. et al v. VIZIO, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-06758-GW-DFM (C.D. Cal.), Dkt. 115 (Scheduling Order)

Maxell Extrinsic Evidence for Preliminary Claim Constructions (Aug. 18, 2022)

Petitioner VIZIO, Inc.'s Power of Attorney for U.S. Patent No. 7,730,507