Juniper Networks, Inc. vs Monarch networking solutions LLC

Petitioner's Notice of Appeal

Final Written Decision: original

Ex. 3004

Other: Hearing transcript

Petitioner's Demonstratives

Monarch's Trial Presentation

Patent Owner's Unopposed Motion to Accept New Evidence in the Form of a Declaration of Dr. Daniel Minoli

Petitioner's Supplemental Brief Regarding Patent Owner's Sur-Rely Expert Declaration

Updated Petitioner Power of Attorney

Ex. 3003

ORDER Conditionally Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christopher Sabbagh

ORDER Setting Oral Argument

Petitioner's Request for Oral Argument

Patent Owner's Request for Oral Argument

Motion: PHV Chris Sabbagh

PHV Declaration - Chris Sabbagh

Petitioner's Objections to Patent Owner's Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(B)(1)

Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,693,369

EX2015 Minoli Declaration re Sur-Reply

Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response

Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Samrat Bhattacharjee

Y. Miyazaki et al., A Proposal for a NAT Traversal System That Does Not Require Additional Functions at Terminals

W. Jiang et al., Towards Junking the PBX: Deploying IP Telephony

T. Wallingford, Switching to VoIP, O’Reilly (2005)

P. Engelstad & G. Egeland, Peer-to-Peer IP Telephony

Y. Yu et al., An Efficient NAT Traversal for SIP and Its Associated Media Sessions

F. Thernelius, SIP, NAT, and Firewalls, Royal Institute of Tech. Stockholm (May 2000)

Andrew Tanenbaum, Computer Networks (4th Ed. 2003)

ORDER Granting Stay of Reexamination

Ex. 3002

Ex. 3001

Petitioner's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/015,315

Ex Parte Reexamination Filing Data

USPTO Reexamination Statistics

Juniper v. Monarch (IPR2024-00565) Institution Decision

Patent Owner's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Stay Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/015,315

Petitioner's Opposed Motion to Stay Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/015,315

Patent Owner's Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,693,369

EX2013 - RFC1010

EX2014 - Minoli Declaration ISO IPR2024-00175 Patent Owner Response

Patent Owner's Objections to Petitioner's Evidence Pursuant to 37CFR 42.64(B)(1)

Institution Decision: Grant

SCHEDULING ORDER

Updated Mandatory Notices of the Patent Owner Pursuant to 37 CFR 42.8(a)(2)

Patent Owner's Amended Power of Attorney Under 37 CFR 42.10

ORDER Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of William B. Collier, Jr. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10

Patent Owner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admissions of William B. Collier, Jr. Pursuant to 37 CFR 42.10(c)

Declaration in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of William B. Collier, Jr. Under 37 CFR 42.10(c)

Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,693,369

EX2001 - Declaration of Daniel Minoli

EX2002 - Vita and Credentials of Dan Minoli

EX2003 - RFC793

EX2004 - RFC768

EX2005 - RFC1933

EX2006 - RFC1631

EX2007 - RFC2663

EX2008 - Order Granting Reexam 90-015315

EX2009 - Reexam Stats 2024

EX2010 - US Publication App 2002/0141389

EX2011 - RFC2460

Notice : Mandatory Notice

Notice : Power of Attorney

Notice: Notice filing date accorded

Petition

Power of Attorney

U.S. Patent No. 8,693,369 to Mohamed Boucadair (“’369 patent”)

Prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 8,693,369

Declaration of Dr. Samrat Bhattacharjee under 37 C.F.R. §1.68

Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Bhattacharjee

Declaration of Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis under 37 C.F.R. §1.68

P. Richter et al., “A Primer on IPv4 Scarcity”

H. Yeom et al., “IP Multiplexing by Transparent Port-Address Translator”

RFC 3022 (Traditional NAT), dated January 2001

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0016826 to Johansson et al.

A. Reitz, “The Dynamic Port Reservation Protocol”

M. Shin et al., “Using a Single IPv4 Global Address in DSTM”

U.S. Patent No. 7,356,045 to Satapati et al. (“Satapati”)

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0154306 to Perry (“Perry”)

RFC 950 (Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure), dated August 1985

U.S. Patent No. 7,624,195 to Biswas et al. (“Biswas-195”)

WO Publication No. 01/02965 A2 to Herbst et al. (“Herbst”)

RFC 7597 (Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation), dated July 2015

RFC 4632 (Classless Inter-domain Routing), dated August 2006

U.S. Patent Application No. 10/873,547 to Tornetta et al. (“Tornetta”)

U.S. Patent No. 7,873,038 to LaVigne et al. (“LaVigne”)

U.S. Patent Application No. 11/699,765 to McAlister (“McAlister”)

U.S. Patent No. 8,019,889 to Biswas et al. (“Biswas”)

U.S. Patent No. 7,394,809 to Kumar et al. (“Kumar”)

U.S. Patent No. 7,068,647 to Fangman et al. (“Fangman”)

U.S. Patent No. 8,032,639 to King et al. (“King”)

RFC 791, Internet Protocol Specification (September 1981)

U.S. Patent No. 5,014,221 to Mogul (“Mogul”)

U.S. Patent No. 5,163,131 to Row et al. (“Row”)

July 20, 2006 Capture of RFC 791, Wayback Machine

Michael Witt, A Comment on Current Source Routing Techniques (1987)

Andrew Tanenbaum, Computer Networks (5th Ed. 2011)

Monarch’s Opposition to Juniper’s Motion to Transfer

PTO Reexamination Operational Statistics

Complaint, Monarch Networking Solutions LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Unified EPR (Control No. 90/015,315), filed on October 23, 2023