Nokia of America Corporation et al. vs Iarnach Technologies Limited

Notice: refund approved

Petitioners' Request for Refund of Post-Institution Fees

Institution Decision: Deny

Patent Owner's Surreply to Petitioner's Preliminary Response Reply

Petitioner's Exhibit 1037 Submission

Order Dismissing U.S. Patent No. 8,934,359

Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owners' Preliminary Response

Patent Owner's Preliminary Response Under 37 CFR 42.107 to Petition for Inter Partes Review

EX2001 - Declaration of Bruce Schofield in Support of Patent Owner's Preliminary Response

EX2002 - Defendant's AT&T et al, Invalidity Contentions

EX2003 - Defendant's Verizon et al, Invalidity Contentions

EX2004 - Summons Executed as to AT&T Services Inc

EX2005 - Federal Court Management Statistics

Order: Granting Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw Counsel 37 C.F.R. sec. 42.10

Petitioner's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Counsel

Petitioners' Updated Mandatory Notices

Notice : Mandatory Notice

Notice : Power of Attorney

Notice: NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

Notice : Power of Attorney for Nokia of America Corporation

Notice : Power of Attorney for AT&T Services, Inc.

U.S. Patent No. 8,934,359

File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,934,359

Declaration of Dr. Alexander V. Sergienko

Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Alexander V. Sergienko

ITU-T Recommendation G.984.3, Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks

U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2005/0149822

U.S. Patent No. 6,005,694

R. Ramaswami & K. Sivarajan, Optical Networks, A Practical Perspective

G. Kramer & G. Pesavento, Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON)

Iarnach’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions, 2:23-cv-231

Iarnach’s Infringement Contentions for the ’359, 2:23-cv-231

U.S Patent App. Pub. No. 2010/0316381

U.S Patent App. Pub. No. 2006/0222362

U.S Patent App. Pub. No. 2008/0260378

U.S Patent App. Pub. No. 2010/0021158

U.S Patent App. Pub. No. 2010/0316380

U.S. Patent No. 8,548,328

F. Effenberger, Next-Generation PON—Part II: Candidate Systems

F. Effenberger, Next-Generation PON—Part III: Candidate Systems

H. Chung et al., Implementation of a High Speed GEM Frame Sync

K. Mohammandani, Highest Cost First-Based QoS Mapping Scheme for Fiber...

Doc. No. 50, Docket Control Order, 2:23-cv-00231

Doc. No. 31, Order Granting Nokia’s Motion to Intervene, 2:23-cv-00231

U.S. District Courts – Judicial Caseload Profile (Dec. 2023)

Doc. No. 45, Agreed Docket Control Order, 2:23-cv-00631

What is the Difference Between EPON and GPON?, HITRON

TU-T Recommendation G.984.2, Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks GPON

Declaration of Dr. Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis

Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis

Hall-Ellis Declaration Attachment 1A

Hall-Ellis Declaration Attachment 1B

Hall-Ellis Declaration Attachment 1C

Hall-Ellis Declaration Attachment 1D

ITU-T Recommendation G.9807.1, 10-Gigabit-capable symmetric passive...

Doc. No. 1, Complaint, 2:23-cv-00231

Doc. No. 1, Complaint, 2:23-cv-00631

Petition : as filed