Vertiv Corporation vs Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

Director Discretionary Decision: Deny

Petitioner's Corrected Response to Discretionary Denial Brief

Email Correspondence

Patent Owner Preliminary Response

U.S. Patent No. 6,694,759 to Bash

Patent Owner Updated Exhibit List

Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Request for Discretionary Denial

U.S. Patent No. 6,854,287 (the “’287 Patent”)

Chandrakant Patel et al., Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of High Compute Density Data Centers to Assure System Inlet Air Specifications, The Pacific Rim/ASME Int’l Elec. Pack’g Tech. Conf. and Exhibition (July 8–13, 2001)

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. Dawn Acquisitions LLC (d/b/a Evoque Data Center Solutions), No. 24-cv-00142, Dkt. 1

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. Digital Realty Trus, Inc. et al., 24-cv- 00139, Dkt. 1

Valtrus Innovations v. NTT Data Services, Civil Action No. 24-cv- 00361 (Lead Case), Dkt. 87 (Vertiv’s Response to Valtrus’s Motion to Dismiss Vertiv’s Declaratory Judgment Complaint) (redacted)

U.S. Patent No. 6,718,277 (the “’277 Patent”)

J. Gilstrap, Calendar of Events for April 6, 2026

J. Gilstrap, Calendar of Events for June 26, 2026

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. DataBank Holdings Ltd., No. 24-cv- 00777, Dkt. 1

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. TierPoint, LLC, No. 24-cv-00776, Dkt. 1

Valtrus Innovations v. NTT Data Services, Civil Action No. 24-cv- 00361 (Lead Case), Dkt. 101 (Vertiv’s Motion for Protective Order)

Valtrus Innovations v. NTT Data Services, Civil Action No. 24-cv- 00361 (Lead Case), Dkt. 81 (Valtrus’s Motion to Dismiss Vertiv’s Declaratory Judgment Complaint)

PO Discretionary Denial Brief

Interim Processes Memo

Vertiv Consolidation Order

DataBank Consolidation Order

DB Answer

TierPoint Amended Answer

Vertiv DJ Complaint Part 1 of 2

Vertiv DJ Complaint Part 2 of 2

Vertiv Resp re MTD

Lead Counsel Change

NOA

Letter from Counsel 1

Letter from Counsel 2

Email from Counsel 1

Email from Counsel 2

Email from Counsel 3

Cardware Order

NTT DCO

Netlist Order

DB Amended DCO

Vertiv Mot to Intervene

Returned Summons Digital Realty

Invalidity Contentions 1

App 3 to Contentions

Invalidity Contentions 2

Guidance on Recission

Docket Navigator Statistics - Gilstrap

Federal Court Statistics

Email from Counsel 4

101 Contentions

U.S. Patent No. 6,775,997

U.S. Patent No. 6,868,683

Vertiv IDs

DB IDs

TierPoint IDs

179 Maintenance Fees

Vertiv Press Release

Vertiv Timeline

Emerson 10K

An Introduction to Vertiv

11/670,208 File History

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0092577

11/670,208 Assignment Record

11/873,236 IDS

U.S. Patent No. 7,857,214

11/873,236 Assignment Abstract

U.S. Patent No. 6,775,997

U.S. Patent No. 6,945,058

Notice: Notice filing date accorded

Notice: Mandatory Notice

Notice: Power of Attorney

Petition: as filed

Notice: Power of Attorney

U.S. Patent No. 6,862,179 (“the ’179 patent”)

Declaration of John P. Abraham

Prosecution History of the ’179 patent

Infringement Claim Chart for the ’179 Patent in Valtrus Innovations Limited

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0065097A1 (“Bash”)

U.S. Patent No. 6,574,104 B2 (“Patel”)

Infringement Claim Chart for the ‘179 Patent in Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0149911 (“Bishop”)

U.S. Patent No. 6,188,189 (“Blake”)

U.S. Patent No. 5,979,167 (“Kochavi”)

Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary (1979) (definition of “partition”)

U.S. Patent No. 5,467,609 (“Feeney”)