Target competitive analysis

Loading summary...

Latest PTAB cases involving Target

Discover the latest PTAB cases involving Target, highlighting their recent legal challenges and patent disputes.

Last updated on: Nov 9, 2025
Proceeding NumberFiling DatePetitionerRespondentStatus

Get alerts for PTAB Cases involving Target

IPR2020-00978Jun 1, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSInstitution Denied
IPR2020-00979Jun 1, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00980Jun 1, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00934May 27, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00977May 27, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00931May 15, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00932May 15, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00933May 15, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSTerminated-Settled
IPR2020-00903May 8, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision
IPR2020-00904May 8, 2020TARGETPROXICOM WIRELESSFinal Written Decision

Peer Comparison New

IP litigation analysis comparing Target with top 3 competitors. Includes complete PTAB case data and opposition data from 2018 onwards.

Last updated on: Nov 6, 2025
CompanyOppositions FiledOppositions FacedPTAB Cases FiledPTAB Cases Faced
DINGFU BIOTARGET - 4 - -
GLAXOSMITHKLINE29112812
MERCK PATENT3425 - -
PFIZER51874312