Driver authentication system and method for monitoring and controlling vehicle usage

Patent No. US10259465 (titled "Driver authentication system and method for monitoring and controlling vehicle usage") on Feb 16, 2018. The application was issued on Apr 16, 2019.

What is this patent about?

’465 is related to the field of vehicle telematics and driver safety systems, specifically focusing on the real-time monitoring and behavioral control of high-risk operators. The technology addresses the safety gap in conventional driver education by providing a hardware-based enforcement mechanism that ensures vehicles are operated within predefined safety boundaries, such as speed limits and geographic constraints.

The underlying idea behind ’465 is the creation of a driver-specific enforcement environment where the vehicle’s performance capabilities are dynamically restricted based on the identity of the person behind the wheel. By utilizing a portable data logging device that stores a unique operating profile, the system can distinguish between a high-risk driver requiring strict oversight and an authorized owner who requires unrestricted access, effectively turning the vehicle into a programmable safety tool.

The claims of ’465 focus on a dual-unit architecture comprising a master control unit for driver authentication and a slave control unit that interfaces directly with the vehicle’s onboard computers. This hardware pairing works in concert to validate a unique identification code, monitor real-time telemetry via GPS, and execute corrective actions—such as governing mechanical operations or triggering cabin alarms—whenever the driver deviates from the preprogrammed safety parameters.

In practice, the system functions as an active governor that integrates with the vehicle's ignition and electrical systems. When a high-risk driver authenticates via an iButton or RFID tag, the master unit loads specific thresholds for speed, location, and hours of operation. If these limits are exceeded, the slave unit can intervene by governing mechanical operations or disabling non-essential electronics like the radio, providing immediate feedback that forces the driver to return to compliant behavior.

This approach differentiates itself from standard passive data loggers by moving beyond simple post-incident reporting to provide real-time intervention. Unlike prior solutions that merely record bad habits for later review, this invention actively prevents unsafe operation as it occurs, utilizing a centralized database to allow parents or fleet managers to remotely configure and update safety rules that are physically enforced by the vehicle's own control hardware.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’465 was filed, vehicle monitoring and access control were typically implemented using physical keys or basic electronic fobs that lacked the capacity for granular, user-specific operational constraints. At a time when onboard diagnostic systems commonly relied on passive data logging rather than active intervention, the enforcement of driving policies was generally limited to post-incident review rather than real-time governance. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the dynamic synchronization of remote administrative profiles with local vehicle control units non-trivial, often requiring manual configuration or specialized hardware that could not easily distinguish between multiple operators of a single vehicle to apply varying levels of restriction.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through the integration of a centralized database, a portable data logging device, and a multi-tiered control unit architecture that enables real-time, driver-specific vehicle governance. By establishing a master-slave control relationship within the vehicle, the system shifts from simple authentication to active operational enforcement, where a slave unit generates persistent alarm signals or disables non-essential cabin systems until the vehicle is brought back within preprogrammed safety parameters. This architectural shift allows for the simultaneous management of multiple operating profiles for a single vehicle, overcoming the constraint of static vehicle settings and enabling immediate feedback loops that intervene during high-risk driving behaviors such as speeding or unauthorized geographic usage.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 20 claims, with claims 1, 11, and 15 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a driver authentication and monitoring system and method that utilize master and slave control units to verify a driver's identity, apply a specific operating profile, and monitor vehicle usage to ensure compliance with established parameters. The dependent claims serve to further define the system components and operational constraints, such as incorporating GPS modules for location and speed tracking, specifying hardware modules within the slave control unit, detailing various operating parameters like seatbelt usage and hours of operation, and establishing remote notification and vehicle governing protocols when profile violations occur.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Data logging device
(Claim 11, Claim 15)
The operating profile can be loaded to a driver identification and data logging device in conjunction with the remote computer. The driver identification and data logging device can allow identification of various drivers associated with the vehicle. The system can include additional features such as data logging, alarming, operation governance, ease of programmability and can utilize GPS technology to provide high-risk driver safety.A hardware component used to store driver identification, record vehicle usage data (such as GPS speed and location), and maintain the operating profile.
Governing mechanical operations
(Claim 15)
The driver authentication system can include additional features such as data logging, alarming, operation governance, ease of programmability and can utilize GPS technology to provide high-risk driver safety. The system also provides user awareness that reduce the likelihood of a high-risk driver injury or fatality by helping the high-risk drivers with safe driving habits through immediate and real time feedback and governing. The programmable operating parameters associated with the real time driver feedback can categorize the system as a unique driver safety device.The act of remotely or automatically restricting or controlling the physical performance and functions of the vehicle when a driver violates the set operating profile.
Master control unit
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
A master control unit can receive a unique identification code from the data logging device to authenticate the high-risk driver and to operate the vehicle within the desired operating profile. The master control unit permits the at least one driver to operate the vehicle within an operating profile if the master control unit receives at least one of a unique identification code. The slave control unit receives commands from the master control unit and generates a real time alarm signal if the driver violates the preprogrammed operating profile.A primary control component in the vehicle that authenticates drivers via identification codes and manages the execution of the driver's specific operating profile.
Operating profile
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 15)
A proprietary and centralized database comprising a software application can be accessed by an authorized user via a network utilizing a remote computer in order to configure a desired operating profile that matches requirements of the high-risk driver. The operating parameters can be for example, but not limited to, data concerning maximum allowable vehicle speed, vehicle location, vehicle hours of operating and seat belt usage. The system and method described herein can provide multiple operating profiles for a single vehicle that allows the owners to operate the vehicle without any restrictions yet have restrictions in affect when the vehicle is operated by the high risk driver.A set of preprogrammed vehicle operating parameters and restrictions tailored to a specific driver, such as maximum speed, allowable locations, and hours of operation.
Slave control unit
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
A slave control unit receives commands from the master control unit and generates a real time alarm signal if the driver violates the preprogrammed operating profile unique to the driver. The slave control unit can generate the alarm signal via a voice synthesized means, sounding a cabin buzzer, toggling the dome light and/or powering the radio off. The slave control unit can remain until the driver corrects the operating condition and brings the vehicle within the desired operating profile.A secondary control component interfaced with the vehicle's computer systems to monitor real-time operation, detect profile violations, and execute control commands or feedback signals.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:23-cv-00607Dec 15, 2023Phelan Group, Llc V. Mercedes-Benz Group Ag
2:23-cv-00606Dec 15, 2023Phelan Group, LLC v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
2:23-cv-00094Jan 9, 2023Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc V. Lupin Ltd.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10259465

Application Number
US15898322A
Filing Date
Feb 16, 2018
Publication Date
Apr 16, 2019
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents