Receiver method and apparatus for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network with different channel bandwidths

Patent No. US10554459 (titled "Receiver method and apparatus for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network with different channel bandwidths") on Apr 25, 2019. The application was issued on Feb 4, 2020.

What is this patent about?

’459 is related to the field of wireless OFDM communications, specifically addressing the challenge of maintaining reliable control signaling across diverse channel bandwidths. In multi-user environments like G.hn or WiMAX, devices often operate on different bandplans, where narrower bandwidths suffer from reduced frequency diversity. This creates a disparity in the decodability of packet headers, which are critical for providing the receiver with the necessary parameters to process the subsequent payload.

The underlying idea behind ’459 is to compensate for reduced frequency diversity in narrowband transmissions by increasing temporal diversity through a specific header repetition and reordering scheme. By recognizing that a narrower channel has fewer subcarriers to spread information across, the invention dynamically scales the number of OFDM symbols used for the header. This ensures that nodes operating in restricted bandwidths can achieve the same level of signal robustness as wideband nodes by repeating header bits across multiple time slots.

The claims of ’459 focus on a transceiver and method that differentiates between two packet types based on their channel bandwidth and header structure. For a wideband packet, the header is split into two different sets of bits across two OFDM symbols. Conversely, for a narrowband packet—where the bandwidth is at least two times smaller—the header is expanded into four parts across four symbols. In this second type, the first and second symbols contain the same bits, as do the third and fourth, but the repeated bits are modulated in a different order to maximize diversity.

In practice, the system implements this by having the transmitter select a repetition value, denoted as D, which defines how many OFDM symbols will carry the header information. When the receiver processes a narrowband packet, it doesn't just receive a simple copy of the data; the reordered modulation of the repeated header bits ensures that localized interference or fading in the frequency domain does not consistently corrupt the same information bits. This multi-symbol approach allows the receiver to combine energy from successive symbols to successfully decode the control data.

This approach differs from prior solutions by moving away from a fixed header length for all devices in a domain. Instead of imposing a high overhead on wideband devices or leaving narrowband devices with unreliable connections, the invention uses a variable repetition scheme that can be signaled via a MAP frame or detected blindly by the receiver. By linking the repetition factor directly to the bandwidth and employing bit reordering, the invention optimizes the balance between spectral efficiency and link reliability in heterogeneous networks.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’459 was filed, packet-based orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems were typically implemented using a fixed header structure where control information was mapped to a static number of OFDM symbols. At a time when multi-user communication over shared channels commonly relied on pre-defined bandplans for frequency diversity, hardware and software constraints made the dynamic adaptation of header repetition non-trivial, particularly when devices with varying bandwidth capabilities coexisted within the same domain. Systems of this era generally utilized a uniform repetition scheme across the entire frequency band, which often resulted in a technical trade-off between decoding reliability for narrowband devices and transmission overhead for wideband devices.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement through an architectural shift that enables variable header repetition schemes within a single communication domain. By allowing the number of symbols used for header information blocks to be adjusted based on the specific bandplan or frequency diversity requirements of a node, the system overcomes the constraint of fixed-overhead signaling. This integration of flexible repetition parameters (D and H values) achieves a technical effect of improved header decodability for narrowband applications, such as smart grid interfaces, without imposing unnecessary throughput penalties on wideband devices. The solution enables heterogeneous nodes to maintain interoperability while optimizing the reliability of the physical layer header across diverse medium conditions.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 20 claims, with claims 1, 9, and 15 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a wireless OFDM transceiver and related methods for processing different packet types across varying channel bandwidths, specifically utilizing distinct header bit configurations and symbol demodulation sequences to manage header information. The dependent claims serve to provide additional technical detail regarding diversity for increased reception reliability, support for specific applications like SmartGrid and various wireless standards, and the use of Media Access Plan frames to determine symbol counts for header reception.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Channel bandwidth
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 15)
For the power-line medium, G.9960 has defined two overlapped baseband bandplans, 50 MHz-PB and 100 MHz-PB. The possibility of having narrower bandplans such as 25 MHz-PB and 12.5 MHz-PB are under discussion in order to support, for example, SmartGrid applications. The level of frequency diversity is different depending on the bandplan, hence providing different header decodability.The specific frequency range (e.g., 12.5 MHz to 100 MHz) allocated for transmission, which determines the necessary level of header repetition to maintain communication reliability.
Different order
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 15)
The second set of header bits of the second header field received using the second OFDM symbol are received in a different order than the first set of header bits of the second header field received using the first OFDM symbol. This relates to providing different header decodability and increasing reliability for narrowband devices.A reordering or permutation of the same set of header bits when repeated in a subsequent OFDM symbol to enhance decodability and diversity.
First packet type
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 15)
The header containing PHYH bits (header information block) is carried over one or two OFDM symbols (D=1 or 2). The possibility of carrying more than PHYH bits in the header (H=1 or 2) is also under discussion. This relates to accommodating different repetition schemes (D=1, . . . , DMAX and H=1, . . . , HMAX) in a single domain.A specific OFDM packet structure designed for wider bandwidths where the header information is split into two distinct parts across two symbols without repetition of the same bit sets.
Header field
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 15)
The header contains important control information for the receiver to decode the payload properly, and also provides information about the packet length for virtual carrier sensing. The header containing PHYH bits (header information block) is carried over one or two OFDM symbols (D=1 or 2), and within each symbol, multiple header information blocks are repeated over the entire frequency band.The portion of an OFDM packet containing control information and PHY bits, which can be scaled in length (H) and repeated across symbols (D) to adjust for frequency diversity and bandwidth.
Second packet type
(Claim 1, Claim 9, Claim 15)
If D is fixed to 2, then it increases reliability for the narrowband devices, but may also unnecessarily increase overhead for the wide-band devices. An exemplary aspect is therefore directed to techniques to accommodate different repetitions schemes (D=1, . . . , DMAX and H=1, . . . , HMAX) in a single domain, and still allow devices to communicate with one another.A specific OFDM packet structure designed for narrower bandwidths that utilizes both temporal repetition (D=2) and header extension (H=2) to ensure reliability, resulting in four header parts across four symbols.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:22-cv-00277Jul 22, 2022AX Wireless LLC v. Dell Inc. et al
2:22-cv-00279Jul 22, 2022AX Wireless LLC v. HP Inc.
2:22-cv-00280Jul 22, 2022AX Wireless LLC v. Lenovo Group Limited

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US10554459

Application Number
US16394490A
Filing Date
Apr 25, 2019
Publication Date
Feb 4, 2020
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents