Liquid crystal display unit and production method thereof

Patent No. US7414682 (titled "Liquid crystal display unit and production method thereof") on Jun 17, 2003. The application was issued on Aug 19, 2008.

What is this patent about?

’682 is related to the field of liquid crystal displays (LCDs), specifically focusing on improving luminance and contrast in modes such as In-Plane Switching (IPS), Multi-domain Vertical Alignment (MVA), and Patterned Vertical Alignment (PVA). In these high-viewing-angle architectures, pixels are often divided into multiple domains to stabilize liquid crystal orientation. However, the boundaries between these domains—known as disclination areas—suffer from poor light modulation, leading to reduced contrast and dark spots that lower the overall brightness of the panel.

The underlying idea behind ’682 is to strategically mask the low-performance regions of a pixel while simultaneously reclaiming light that would otherwise be lost. By constructing internal structures (such as electrodes or alignment ribs) with a hybrid of light-transmitting and light-non-transmitting portions, the invention ensures that the high-modulation areas of the liquid crystal remain transparent to the viewer, while the problematic disclination zones are physically blocked by an opaque layer. Crucially, this opaque layer is designed to be highly reflective, allowing light to be bounced back into the backlight unit for recycling, which significantly boosts the effective luminance of the display.

The claims of ’682 focus on a pixel structure where the domain-dividing elements—such as the pixel or common electrodes—are composed of a central light-non-transmitting core surrounded by a wider light-transmitting conductive edge. Specifically, the independent claims describe a layered arrangement where a non-transmitting conductive layer is positioned closest to the substrate, with a wider transparent conductive layer (like ITO) layered on top of it. This geometry ensures that the electrical field is maintained across a wide area to drive the liquid crystal, while the opaque center specifically targets the disclination region that typically forms over the middle of the electrode.

In practice, the invention utilizes a high-reflectance metal, such as an Ag-Pd-Cu alloy, for the non-transmitting portion. This material has a much higher reflectance than standard aluminum or chromium, maximizing the efficiency of the light recycling process. When the transparent conductive layer is deposited over this reflective core, it creates a slight physical ridge. This ridge acts as a geometric anchor that reliably positions the liquid crystal disclination directly above the opaque portion, ensuring that the lowest-contrast part of the pixel is never visible to the user.

This approach differs from prior solutions that either used entirely opaque electrodes—which severely limited the aperture ratio and brightness—or entirely transparent electrodes, which allowed low-contrast disclination lines to wash out the image. By employing a composite electrode with a reflective base and a wider transparent cap, the ’682 patent achieves a high aperture ratio without the typical contrast penalties. Furthermore, the use of high-conductivity silver alloys in the electrode core reduces signal delay and flickering compared to designs relying solely on high-resistance transparent conductors.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 1990s and early 2000s when ’682 was filed, wide-viewing-angle liquid crystal displays were typically implemented using in-plane-switching architectures where both pixel and counter electrodes were positioned on a single substrate. At a time when these systems commonly relied on opaque metallic electrode structures to generate transversal electric fields, hardware constraints made achieving high luminance non-trivial because the physical footprint of the electrodes significantly reduced the effective aperture ratio and blocked incident display light.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement by integrating a specific electrode and alignment layer architecture that optimizes the transversal electric field without the traditional loss of light transmission. By utilizing a structural configuration that redefines the spatial relationship and material properties of the modulating electrodes, the system overcomes the technical constraint of low aperture ratios inherent in standard in-plane-switching designs. This architectural shift enables increased screen luminance and improved light efficiency while maintaining the wide viewing angle capabilities of the display.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 11 claims, with claims 1, 7, and 10 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on the configuration of liquid crystal displays, specifically detailing the use of multi-layered structures or electrodes composed of both light-transmitting and light-non-transmitting conductive materials to manage light modulation, domain division, or signal line conductivity. The dependent claims serve to provide specific technical refinements, such as defining the materials used for the layers, specifying the spatial arrangement and reflectivity of the structural components, and describing the methods by which these structures control liquid crystal alignment and electrical performance.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Disclination region
(Claim 1)
The structure for dividing the liquid crystal of a pixel into a plurality of domains is formed on an inner surface of one of the substrates. A disclination region is generated in a boundary region of the plurality of domains. The disclination region has a modulation rate that is lower than a modulation rate of the domains.A boundary area between a plurality of liquid crystal domains where the modulation rate of the liquid crystal is lower than the modulation rate within the domains themselves.
Light-non-transmitting conductive layer
(Claim 7, Claim 10)
The light-non-transmitting conductive layer is layered on the inner surface of the one of the pair of substrates and the light-transmitting conductive layer is layered on the light-non-transmitting conductive layer. This configuration applies to at least one of the scanning signal lines, the video signal lines, the pixel electrode, or the common electrode.A layer within a signal line or electrode that blocks light and, in certain configurations, is layered directly on the inner surface of a substrate beneath a light-transmitting conductive layer.
Light-non-transmitting portion
(Claim 1)
Each of the structures is at least partially constituted by a light-transmitting portion and a light-non-transmitting portion. A central portion of each of the structures in a plan view is constituted by the light-non-transmitting portion.A part of a structure that blocks light, specifically constituting the central portion of the structure in a plan view.
Light-transmitting conductive layer
(Claim 7, Claim 10)
At least one of the scanning signal lines, the video signal lines, the pixel electrode, or the common electrode is at least partially constituted by a light-transmitting conductive layer and a light-non-transmitting conductive layer. A width of the light-transmitting conductive layer is wider than a width of the light-non-transmitting layer.A layer within a signal line or electrode that is wider than the associated light-non-transmitting layer to improve light transmittance in a transversal electric field type display.
Light-transmitting portion
(Claim 1)
Each of the structures is at least partially constituted by a light-transmitting portion and a light-non-transmitting portion. An edge portion of each of the structures in a plan view is constituted by the light-transmitting portion. The light-transmitting portion of each of the structures is formed by an electrically conductive material.A part of a structure formed from an electrically conductive material that allows light to pass through, specifically constituting the edge portion of the structure in a plan view.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:22-cv-00385Oct 3, 2022Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Innolux Corporation

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US7414682

Application Number
US10343464A
Filing Date
Jun 17, 2003
Publication Date
Aug 19, 2008
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents