Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery

Patent No. US7747745 (titled "Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery") on Jun 14, 2007. The application was issued on Jun 29, 2010.

What is this patent about?

’745 is related to the field of behavioral targeting and electronic advertisement placement. In digital advertising, behavioral targeting (BT) companies track user actions on one site to serve relevant ads on another. However, a significant technical and economic challenge exists in identifying these users across different domains and ensuring that the cost of purchasing ad space on a secondary site does not exceed the potential revenue generated by the specific user profile.

The underlying idea behind ’745 is the use of a profit-based filter to decide whether to tag a user for future tracking. Instead of indiscriminately tagging every visitor, the system calculates the expected revenue of a specific profile attribute—such as a high-value search for 'mortgage' versus a low-value search for 'socks'—and compares it against the cost of ad space on potential secondary media properties. By establishing a price cap, the system ensures that tracking and authorization only occur when a positive margin is anticipated.

The claims of ’745 focus on an automated method and system for authorizing third-party media properties to display targeted ads based on a visitor's profile attributes. The independent claims specifically require determining a profile-attribute-dependent revenue and then electronically authorizing a second media property to serve an ad only if the price of that ad space remains below a calculated cap. This cap is derived by subtracting a selected margin or cost from the expected revenue associated with the user's specific behavioral data.

In practice, the invention works by intercepting user behavior on a first property and immediately evaluating the economic viability of following that user. If the expected revenue from a 'Travel' category profile exceeds the cost of a second site's inventory plus serving fees, the BT company arranges for a readable tag or cookie to be placed. This tag acts as a signal to the second media property that the BT company is willing to buy an ad impression for this specific visitor at a pre-determined price point.

This approach differs from prior solutions like DoubleClick’s Boomerang by introducing a real-time economic gatekeeper to the tagging process. Traditional methods focus on the technical ability to recognize a user across domains, whereas this invention integrates financial logic into the tracking handshake. By selectively authorizing third parties only when a profit is mathematically likely, the system optimizes ad spend and prevents the accumulation of tracking data that would result in a net loss for the advertiser.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

Prosecution Position

Claims

This patent contains 46 claims, with claims 1, 24, and 37 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a method, a server device, and a system for directing electronic advertisements by determining revenue based on visitor profile attributes and authorizing a third-party media property to display correlated ads to those visitors at a price below a specific cap. The dependent claims further define the process by specifying timing sequences, calculating price caps based on profit margins, utilizing look-up data structures for attribute mapping, implementing visitor tagging mechanisms, and managing ad placement across different media types or payment methods.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Automatically electronically authorizing
(Claim 1, Claim 24, Claim 37)
BT companies enable sites and ad networks (from whom the BT companies buy media) to also place their cookies on the computers of people (visitors) on whose computers the BT company has placed its own cookie. This process—where sites and ad networks place cookies on visitors' computers redirected to them by BT companies—is sometimes referred to as “cookie matching.”The automated process of enabling a second media property to recognize a visitor and serve a specific ad, typically achieved through cookie matching or electronic tagging once profit criteria are met.
Price cap
(Claim 1, Claim 24, Claim 37)
The profit can be calculated by deducting, from the revenues that are expected to be generated from an ad delivered based on the collected profile, at least the price of ad space at a media property. When the calculated profit is positive (i.e., not a loss), the BT company arranges for the visitor to be tagged with a tag readable by the selected media property through which the BT company expects to profit.A maximum allowable cost for purchasing advertising space on a second media property, calculated to ensure a specific profit margin relative to the expected revenue.
Profile-attribute-dependent revenue
(Claim 1, Claim 24, Claim 37)
Profiles of media properties' visitors are worth different amounts to advertisers depending on the profiles. For example, a person who searched for a “mortgage” might be presented with an ad for which the advertiser is willing to pay $3 if that person clicks. A person who visited the mutual fund section might be presented with a mutual-fund related ad where the advertiser is willing to pay $25 for every thousand ads (CPM).The expected income or payment generated from an advertiser for displaying an advertisement that is specifically targeted based on a visitor's collected behavioral, demographic, or interest-based characteristics.
Profile-attribute information
(Claim 1, Claim 24, Claim 37)
The profile could be the observed behavior of the visitor on the media property, demographic information collected on the media property, profile information provided by the visitor to the media property, etc. The server then places a cookie on the user's computer indicating what content was read by the visitor on the page, what keyword was searched for by the user, or what ad was clicked on the page.Data representing a visitor's observed behavior, search history, content consumption, or demographic details collected at a first media property used to categorize the visitor for targeting.
Third-party second media property
(Claim 1, Claim 24, Claim 37)
A media property (in the present context) can also be defined as any equipment that controls an ad space viewed by a visitor, including a web site, an ad network's site, a TV program, or any ad space for which an entity is allowed to sell an advertisement. The tag is used for the purpose of delivering additional ads to a visitor to one media property when that visitor is found later on other media properties.An external entity or advertising space provider (distinct from the first media property) where a visitor is recognized and served a targeted ad based on previously collected profile data.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05721Jul 8, 2025Tiktok Inc V. Almondnet, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US7747745

Application Number
US11763286A
Filing Date
Jun 14, 2007
Publication Date
Jun 29, 2010
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents