Added-revenue off-site targeted internet advertising

Patent No. US7822639 (titled "Added-revenue off-site targeted internet advertising") on Nov 24, 2004. The application was issued on Oct 26, 2010.

What is this patent about?

’639 is related to the field of digital advertising and information distribution, specifically addressing the economic and aesthetic limitations of content saturation on high-traffic media platforms. In traditional digital environments, a website or broadcaster reaches a saturation point when the volume of advertisements or non-core messages begins to degrade the user experience or exceeds the available layout space. This creates a bottleneck where premium publishers must turn away advertisers despite having a valuable, loyal audience that continues to consume content elsewhere across the broader internet.

The underlying idea behind ’639 is to decouple the delivery of targeted advertisements from the specific platform where the audience was originally identified, effectively creating super-saturation by utilizing third-party sites as overflow capacity. Instead of cramming more ads into a sold-out premium site, the system identifies high-value visitors at the primary site and follows them to secondary, less expensive sites. This allows the primary publisher to monetize their audience's attention even when that audience is browsing unrelated content, leveraging the visitor's profile rather than the page's context.

The claims of ’639 focus on a multi-party coordination system that uses visitor tagging to facilitate off-site revenue generation. The independent claims describe a process where a first site marks a visitor's computer with a tag and creates a corresponding electronic record. When that same visitor later appears on a second, different site, the system recognizes the tag and triggers the delivery of an advertisement that was specifically purchased to target visitors of the first site. The claims specifically protect the financial flow where the first site captures a premium price for the targeted audience while the second site receives a smaller fee for providing the display space.

In practice, this mechanism functions as a specialized audience extension network. When a user visits a high-value section of a site—such as a financial news page—they are tagged as a 'preferred visitor.' If the advertising inventory on that financial page is fully booked, the publisher can still sell that user's profile to an advertiser. When the user later visits a general news site or a personal blog that has unsold inventory, the facilitator recognizes the tag and serves the financial ad. This ensures the advertiser reaches the desired demographic in a lower-cost environment while the original publisher retains a significant portion of the revenue.

This approach differs from prior art by shifting the value proposition from the 'site context' to the certified visitor identity. Traditional models relied on the publisher's own pages to host ads, leading to cluttered interfaces and lost revenue once space ran out. By using a facilitator to bridge the gap between a premium 'first broadcaster' and a utility 'second broadcaster,' the invention allows for a higher volume of targeted placements without compromising the aesthetic integrity of the primary site. It effectively turns a publisher's audience into a portable asset that can be monetized across the entire web.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 1990s and early 2000s when ’639 was filed, digital information distribution was characterized by a transition from static content delivery to increasingly interactive, ad-supported architectures. At a time when web-based media was typically implemented using centralized server-client models, the capacity to deliver supplemental content—such as advertisements or notifications—was strictly limited by the physical layout of a specific page or the bandwidth constraints of the user's connection. Systems commonly relied on fixed on-site placements rather than cross-domain tracking, meaning that once a specific digital property reached its aesthetic or structural limit for non-core information, it was considered saturated. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the persistent identification of users across disparate, unrelated media platforms non-trivial, often resulting in lost revenue opportunities when a primary broadcaster could no longer accommodate additional content within their own local context.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement by introducing an architectural shift from local content saturation to a distributed 'super-saturation' model. It addresses the technical problem of rigid capacity limits in digital media by decoupling the audience of a first broadcaster from the physical constraints of that broadcaster’s own site. This is achieved through a structural solution involving a coordinated tagging and recognition framework: a first broadcaster tags visitors, and a second, independent broadcaster recognizes these tags to serve offsite content by proxy. This integration enables a capability where a broadcaster can monetize its specific audience even when the visitor has navigated to an external, unrelated environment. The technical effect is the creation of a virtualized content delivery layer that overcomes the physical and aesthetic boundaries of a single media instance, allowing for the targeted delivery of supplemental data across a network of disparate broadcasters without requiring the first broadcaster to expand its own local infrastructure.

Claims

This patent contains 48 claims, with claims 1 and 24 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a method for generating revenue through offsite targeted advertising by using digital tags to track visitors from a first website and subsequently delivering targeted third-party advertisements to those same visitors when they browse a second, different website. The dependent claims further define this process by specifying methods for tag placement without user consent, identifying specific visitor activities or locations on the initial site, detailing various revenue sharing and pricing models between site proprietors and facilitators, and describing the technical delivery of ads via browsers or web television.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
First Internet site
(Claim 1, Claim 24)
A first broadcaster of the first information-media tagging a preponderance of visitors to the first information-media with a tag. This saturation represents a financially limiting problem to that media after a popular media has a waiting list of advertisement orders. The first broadcaster benefits from selling a placement of an advertisement, a notification or other insertion into an alternative site. In spite of the first broadcaster being at a saturation point, by providing tagging of visitors to this first site, the first broadcaster provides the advertiser with a preponderance of first site visitors.The initial digital media location (broadcaster) that has reached a level of content saturation and initiates the tagging of visitors to facilitate revenue generation from those visitors when they are off-site.
Off-site advertisement
(Claim 1, Claim 24)
Offsite content is content that derived from outside of the immediate local context of a present site. For example, on an Internet page, an offsite content may be a banner or may substantially be the result of clicking on a hyperlink to another page. Selling the visitor to its advertiser while not within the site (OUT OF CONTEXT ad) enables the site to reduce price without devaluing its relationships with the advertisers on the site itself. This special message presentation is for presentation to substantially the same targeted client base but on an off-site basis at another site.Advertising content delivered to a visitor at a location or media site other than the original site where the visitor was initially identified or tagged.
Second Internet site
(Claim 1, Claim 24)
A second broadcaster of a second information-media recognizing a visitor to the second information-media as having the tag. The second site merely rents unsold space for an unknown visitor in return for a fee received from an agency and not the other site. The second broadcaster receives additional revenue with the addition of special message items. The agency pays the second broadcaster for placing insertions on behalf of the advertiser for acceptance by visitors tagged at the first site.An alternative digital media location (broadcaster) that recognizes the tag from the first site and provides the physical space to display the off-site advertisement to the recognized visitor.
Tag
(Claim 1, Claim 24)
A Cookie is a message given to a Web browser by a Web server that serves as recognition symbols or messages in a particular Web browser. Tagging relates to an identification that reveals that the tagged visitor is known to have been at a predetermined information media, such as an internet site or a specific internet page. The tag need not contain any information that identifies the visitor nor need it contain any information that allows the visitor to be profiled. A tag simply identifies that its bearer was so marked for having been at a specific location, or for having been there for a predetermined amount of time.An identification marker or recognition symbol, such as a cookie or a message stored in a text file/directory, that identifies a visitor computer as having visited a specific location or performed a specific action without necessarily containing profiling information.
Visitor profile information
(Claim 1)
Targeted client bases are related, for example, to income level, profession, age, sex or field of interest, to name a few. In general, special messages are directed to the particular targeted client base of a media broadcaster. The second broadcaster site is selected specifically because this site targets a category of visitors similar to the first broadcaster site. The advertiser benefits by having an advertisement, albeit at the second site, nevertheless targeted at visitors to the saturated first broadcaster site.Data associated with a visitor's characteristics or interests, such as income level, profession, age, sex, or field of interest, used to target specific content.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05721Jul 8, 2025Tiktok Inc V. Almondnet, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US7822639

Application Number
US10996491A
Filing Date
Nov 24, 2004
Publication Date
Oct 26, 2010
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents