Computerized systems for added-revenue off-site targeted internet advertising

Patent No. US8244586 (titled "Computerized systems for added-revenue off-site targeted internet advertising") on Feb 8, 2012. The application was issued on Aug 14, 2012.

What is this patent about?

’586 is related to the field of electronic media distribution and targeted advertising. It specifically addresses the problem of media saturation, where a popular digital platform—such as a high-traffic website—reaches its physical or aesthetic limit for displaying advertisements. This saturation prevents the platform from generating additional revenue from advertisers who are eager to reach that specific audience, even when that audience has moved on to other, less crowded areas of the internet.

The underlying idea behind ’586 is to decouple an audience from a specific site context, allowing a primary broadcaster to monetize its visitors even after they have left the site. By identifying and marking visitors at a high-value location, the system can follow those users to secondary, lower-cost locations and serve them the high-value ads they were originally targeted for. This creates a super-saturation model where the advertising capacity of a site is no longer limited by its own layout or page count, but is instead expanded across the entire browsing path of its certified audience.

The claims of ’586 focus on a computer-implemented method for securing revenue through offsite targeted advertising by utilizing a specific tagging and tracking mechanism. The independent claims describe a process of creating electronic records of visitor computers at a first site using tags, and then automatically triggering the delivery of advertisements on a second, different site once those tags are recognized. This mechanism ensures that the third-party advertiser’s content reaches a verified visitor profile regardless of the specific domain being browsed.

In practice, the invention functions as a revenue-sharing ecosystem facilitated by an agency or automated system. When a visitor computer is tagged at a premium site (Site A), and that same computer later visits a less expensive site (Site B), the system recognizes the tag and serves an advertisement targeted to Site A's demographic. The advertiser pays a premium rate for this off-site placement, and the resulting revenue is distributed: Site B receives a fee for hosting the ad, while Site A receives a significant portion of the remaining funds as a reward for having 'certified' the visitor.

This approach differs from traditional advertising by shifting the value from the content of the page to the identity of the visitor. Prior methods relied on increasing the density of ads on a single page or adding more pages to a site, which often degraded the user experience. By contrast, this system utilizes out-of-context placement, allowing premium broadcasters to sell their audience's attention on third-party platforms. This effectively bypasses the physical limits of a single website and creates a new revenue stream from otherwise unsold inventory on secondary sites.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 1990s when ’586 was filed, digital information delivery was typically implemented using centralized web servers and early browser technologies that relied on persistent client-side text files to maintain state across sessions. At a time when systems commonly relied on fixed advertising real estate within a single domain, the capacity to deliver non-core content was strictly limited by the physical layout of a page and the bandwidth constraints of dial-up or early broadband connections. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the dynamic tracking of users across disparate, unrelated media platforms non-trivial, often resulting in a binary choice for broadcasters: either overwhelm the primary user interface with excessive messaging or lose potential revenue once the local layout reached a point of visual or technical saturation.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention addresses the technical problem of media saturation, where the fixed capacity of a primary information channel prevents the delivery of additional non-core content without degrading the user experience or exceeding physical layout limits. The architectural solution involves a cross-media coordination framework where a first broadcaster tags visitors to establish a persistent identity, which is subsequently recognized by a second, independent broadcaster through a facilitating agency. This integration enables a technical shift from site-centric content delivery to visitor-centric delivery, allowing offsite content to be served to a specific user even after they have navigated away from the original source. The technical effect achieved is the expansion of a broadcaster’s content capacity beyond its own architectural boundaries, overcoming the constraint of local interface saturation by utilizing the unsold resources of secondary platforms to reach a verified audience.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 22 claims, with claims 1 and 11 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a computer system programmed to secure revenue through offsite targeted Internet advertising by using digital tags to track visitors from a first website and delivering targeted third-party advertisements to those same visitors when they browse a second, different website. The dependent claims serve to further specify technical implementations such as the use of cookies, the involvement of third-party facilitators, the contractual relationships between site proprietors, and the specific financial distribution of advertising premiums and revenue among the involved parties.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Off-site advertisement
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
In the context of the present invention, offsite content is content that derived from outside of the immediate local context of a present site. For example, on an Internet page, an offsite content may be a banner or may substantially be the result of clicking on a hyperlink to another page. Selling the visitor to its advertiser while not within the site (OUT OF CONTEXT ad) enables the site to reduce price without devaluing its relationships with the advertisers on the site itself.Advertising content delivered to a visitor at a location or media site that is outside of the immediate local context of the original site where the visitor was initially identified or tagged.
Proprietor
(Claim 11)
It is obviously in the best interest of a proprietor of these media, to place as much and as many special messages into each media presentation as possible, since this is a prime and significant source of revenue. A broadcaster is a participant in a distribution of electronic signals—be they digital signals, analog signals, or the likes. In the context of the Internet, a broadcaster is preferably a media owner.The owner or entity controlling an information media site (such as a broadcaster) who manages the placement of core information and special messages.
Tag
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
Tagging relates to an identification that reveals that the tagged visitor is known to have been at a predetermined information media, such as an internet site or a specific internet page. The tag need not contain any information that identifies the visitor nor need it contain any information that allows the visitor to be profiled. A tag simply identifies that its bearer was so marked for having been at a specific location, or for having been there for a predetermined amount of time, or for having conducted some specific action there.An identification marker placed on a visitor's computer or browser that reveals the visitor has previously visited a specific information media location or performed a specific action there.
Third-party advertiser
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
A first contractual agreement is between an agency offering, for example, to an advertiser or a credit card organization, respectively, an insertion of an advertisement or a credit warning into an offsite media. The advertiser pays the agent for this service. The advertiser benefits by having an advertisement, albeit at the second site, nevertheless targeted at visitors to the saturated first broadcaster site.An external entity or client provider that pays to have special messages, such as advertisements or notifications, delivered to a targeted audience.
Visitor profile information
(Claim 1)
Targeted client bases are related, for example, to income level, profession, age, sex or field of interest, to name a few. In general, special messages are directed to the particular targeted client base of a media broadcaster. The tag need not contain any information that identifies the visitor nor need it contain any information that allows the visitor to be profiled.Data associated with a visitor's identity or characteristics, such as income level, profession, age, sex, or field of interest, used to target specific content.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05721Jul 8, 2025Tiktok Inc V. Almondnet, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US8244586

Application Number
US13368686A
Filing Date
Feb 8, 2012
Publication Date
Aug 14, 2012
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents