Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery

Patent No. US8959146 (titled "Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery") on Mar 7, 2014. The application was issued on Feb 17, 2015.

What is this patent about?

’146 is related to the field of behavioral targeting and electronic advertisement placement. Specifically, it addresses the technical and economic inefficiencies of tracking users across different web domains to serve targeted ads based on previously observed browsing behavior, such as search queries or content consumption.

The underlying idea behind ’146 is a profit-driven filtering mechanism for user tagging that occurs before the retargeting process begins. Instead of indiscriminately tagging every visitor to a site for future ad delivery, the system performs a real-time expected profit calculation by subtracting the known cost of ad space on a secondary site from the anticipated revenue generated by the user’s specific profile attributes.

The claims of ’146 focus on a method and system for directing advertisements by transmitting a conditional indicator to a third-party server that controls ad space on a second media property. This transmission is triggered by the acquisition of profile attributes from a visitor's initial interaction with a first media property, ensuring that the subsequent advertisement is specifically correlated to those captured attributes.

In practice, the system functions as a gatekeeper for cookie matching. When a user performs a high-value action, such as searching for a mortgage, the system calculates whether the potential payout from a mortgage ad justifies the cost of buying an impression on a site like a weather portal. If the margin is positive, the system arranges for the secondary site to place a readable tag on the user's device, effectively pre-approving that user for future ad delivery on that specific platform.

This approach differs from prior solutions by introducing an economic threshold to the technical process of user synchronization. While traditional systems focus merely on the ability to recognize a user across domains, this invention ensures that the tagging infrastructure is only deployed when the underlying profile is commercially viable. This prevents the waste of computational resources and ad spend on low-value profiles that would not cover the cost of the secondary media property's inventory.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the mid-2000s when ’146 was filed, behavioral targeting systems commonly relied on static cookie-matching processes where a profile supplier would redirect a user to a third-party ad network to establish a cross-domain identifier. At a time when digital advertising was typically implemented using fixed-price media buys or broad demographic segments, the technical infrastructure for identifying a specific user across different domains was decoupled from the financial valuation of that user's profile. Systems generally functioned by tagging users based on site interactions and then attempting to locate those tagged users across a network of partner sites, regardless of whether the cost of the ad space on a specific partner site was economically viable relative to the specific profile being targeted. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the real-time synchronization of user profiles with dynamic cost-benefit analysis non-trivial, leading to inefficiencies where behavioral ads were served on high-cost inventory that exceeded the value of the underlying user data.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement through the architectural integration of an automated profit-calculation engine directly into the user-tagging and cookie-matching workflow. Instead of indiscriminately tagging users for retargeting across all available media properties, the system calculates an expected profit by deducting the specific cost of ad space at a target media property from the expected revenue generated by a specific behavioral profile. This architectural shift enables a capability where a visitor is only tagged with a property-specific identifier if the calculated profit meets a positive threshold. By dynamically filtering which media properties are authorized to 'recognize' a user based on the intersection of profile value and inventory cost, the system overcomes the technical constraint of inefficient resource allocation in cross-domain advertising, ensuring that the computational and financial overhead of retargeting is only incurred when the specific profile-to-property match is economically justified.

Claims

This patent contains 24 total claims, with claims 1, 17, and 21 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a method, a computer-server device, and a system for directing electronic advertisements by sending specific visitor profile attributes and display conditions to a third-party server after a visitor leaves a first media property for a second media property. The dependent claims serve to further define the technical implementation, such as using tags and URL redirects, and specify various display conditions including pricing thresholds, time limits, and visitor search actions.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Correlated
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
Advertisers are willing to pay different amounts for delivering ads based on the specific profile attribute or attributes they are looking to target. For example, a person who searched for 'mortgage' might be presented with a mortgage-related ad. The system calculates expected profit for an ad correlated with the profile to determine if the placement is financially viable.A specific relationship where the selected advertisement is chosen because it matches or relates to the specific profile attributes collected from the visitor.
First media property
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
A media property can be defined as any equipment that controls an ad space viewed by a visitor, including a web site, an ad network's site, or a TV channel. The first media property is where the user's profile was collected based on observed behavior such as reading specific content, searching, or acquiring a product. It acts as the source of the behavioral or demographic data used for later targeting.The initial electronic platform or equipment where a visitor's profile information is collected or where they are first tagged.
Indicia of a condition
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
The indicia can include the price that a BT company promised to pay a media property for the presentation of an ad. This condition allows the second media property's ad server to decide whether or not to redirect the visitor's computer back to the BT company's server. The decision is based on whether the promised payment covers the media cost or delivers satisfactory margins.Electronic signals or data sent to a third-party server that specify the requirements (such as a specific price or profile match) under which an advertisement should be served to a specific visitor.
Profile attributes
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
A visitor's profile might be enhanced by observed behavior, demographic information, or profile information provided by the visitor. Examples include searching for a specific keyword like 'mortgage', visiting a 'mutual fund' section of a site, or clicking on a specific ad. These attributes are used to determine the value an advertiser is willing to pay for delivering an ad to that specific person.Specific characteristics or data points collected about a visitor's behavior, demographics, or actions used to target advertisements.
Second media property
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
The second media property is a site or ad network where the BT company might like to deliver ads to the profiled visitor. It must be able to recognize the visitor, often through 'cookie matching' or reading a tag placed by or for the BT company. The cost of ad space at this second property is a factor in calculating the expected profit of the ad placement.A subsequent electronic platform visited by the user where the previously collected profile is used to trigger the delivery of a targeted advertisement.
Third-party server computer
(Claim 1, Claim 17, Claim 21)
This server can be an ad network ad server or a site's ad server that places its own cookies on visitors redirected to them. It reads its own tags to recognize visitors previously encountered by the BT company. The server decides whether to serve an ad based on the conditions or prices provided by the BT company.A server controlled by an entity other than the one that collected the initial profile, typically responsible for managing ad space on the second media property.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05721Jul 8, 2025Tiktok Inc V. Almondnet, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US8959146

Application Number
US14201494A
Filing Date
Mar 7, 2014
Publication Date
Feb 17, 2015
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents