Driver authentication system and method for monitoring and controlling vehicle usage

Patent No. US9045101 (titled "Driver authentication system and method for monitoring and controlling vehicle usage") on Apr 8, 2013. The application was issued on Jun 2, 2015.

What is this patent about?

’101 is related to the field of vehicle telematics and driver safety management. Specifically, it addresses the risks associated with high-risk operators, such as teenagers or fleet drivers, by providing a mechanism to enforce safe driving habits through real-time monitoring and active vehicle governance.

The underlying idea behind ’101 is the use of a portable, driver-specific hardware key that not only authenticates the user but also physically carries a customized set of operational constraints from a central database to the vehicle's onboard systems. By decoupling the driving restrictions from the vehicle itself and attaching them to the individual driver’s identity, the system allows a single car to switch dynamically between a restricted mode for high-risk users and an unrestricted mode for authorized owners.

The claims of ’101 focus on a dual-unit architecture consisting of a master control unit for driver validation and a slave control unit for execution. The master unit processes identity codes and GPS data to determine if the driver is adhering to a pre-programmed profile, while the slave unit is responsible for triggering cabin alarms and actively governing mechanical operations of the vehicle to ensure safety when those profile limits are exceeded.

In practice, the system functions by interfacing a data logging device, such as an RFID or USB-based token, with a master controller that interprets speed, location, and time-of-day via a GPS antenna processing module. If the driver exceeds the thresholds defined in their specific profile—such as a maximum speed limit or a geographic boundary—the system provides immediate feedback through voice synthesis or cabin buzzers and can even disable the radio or limit engine performance.

This approach differs from prior art by integrating real-time driver feedback with remote governance that is uniquely tailored to the authenticated individual rather than the vehicle. While traditional systems might log data for later review, this invention creates a closed-loop safety environment where the vehicle’s mechanical behavior and cabin environment are modified instantly to correct dangerous driving habits as they occur.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the late 2000s when ’101 was filed, vehicle security and monitoring were typically implemented using passive mechanical keys or basic electronic immobilizers that lacked granular user-specific logic. At a time when vehicle telematics commonly relied on fixed hardware configurations rather than dynamic network-synchronized profiles, managing high-risk drivers was generally restricted to post-hoc review of data logs or physical supervision. Hardware and software constraints of the era made the real-time enforcement of individualized driving parameters non-trivial, as most onboard diagnostic systems were designed for maintenance rather than active behavioral governance based on the identity of the operator.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a technical advancement in vehicle safety through the integration of a centralized network-accessible database with a local master-slave control architecture for real-time behavioral intervention. By establishing a system that authenticates a specific driver via a data logging device and automatically maps their identity to a pre-configured operating profile, the architecture enables the dynamic enforcement of safety constraints such as speed limits, geographic boundaries, and operational hours. This shift from passive monitoring to active governance allows the vehicle to provide immediate feedback through synthesized voice alarms or hardware interruptions, overcoming the technical constraint of uniform vehicle performance by allowing a single vehicle to exhibit different operational characteristics based on the authenticated user's risk profile.

Claims

The patent contains a total of 20 claims, with claims 1, 11, and 15 serving as the independent claims. These independent claims focus on a driver authentication and monitoring system and method that utilize master and slave control units to validate a driver's identity, enforce specific operating profiles, and trigger alarms or remote mechanical interventions if those profiles are violated. The dependent claims serve to further define the system by specifying hardware components like GPS modules and memory units, detailing specific operating parameters such as speed and location limits, and describing the methods for remote data logging and user notification.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Driver identification and data logging device
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
The operating profile can be loaded to a driver identification and data logging device in conjunction with a remote computer. This device allows identification of various drivers associated with the vehicle, enabling the vehicle to perform differently for high-risk drivers versus authorized users. It records vehicle operation data including location and speed information from a GPS module.A hardware component used to provide a unique identification code for driver authentication and to record vehicle operation data, including GPS-derived information.
Govern mechanical operations
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 15)
The system provides user awareness and reduces the likelihood of injury by helping high-risk drivers with safe driving habits through immediate and real time feedback and governing. The slave control unit is configured to govern mechanical operations of the vehicle remotely to maintain occupant safety. This intervention is triggered when the driver violates the preprogrammed operating profile.The act of remotely or automatically intervening in the physical functions of the vehicle to enforce safety limits defined in the operating profile.
Master control unit
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
A master control unit can receive a unique identification code from the data logging device to authenticate the high-risk driver and to operate the vehicle within the desired operating profile. It communicates commands to a slave control unit based on the driver's adherence to the profile. The master control unit permits operation only if the identification code is received and the profile is not violated.The primary onboard controller responsible for receiving driver identification codes, authenticating the driver, and enforcing the associated operating profile.
Operating profile
(Claim 1, Claim 11, Claim 15)
The operating profile can be configured by an authorized user via a remote computer to match requirements of a high-risk driver. It includes data concerning maximum allowable vehicle speed, vehicle location, vehicle hours of operating, and seat belt usage. The system allows for multiple operating profiles for a single vehicle, enabling different restrictions for different drivers.A set of preprogrammed vehicle operating parameters and restrictions tailored to a specific driver, such as maximum speed, location boundaries, and hours of operation.
Slave control unit
(Claim 1, Claim 11)
A slave control unit receives commands from the master control unit and generates a real time alarm signal if the driver violates the preprogrammed operating profile. The alarm signal can be generated via voice synthesized means, a cabin buzzer, toggling the dome light, or powering the radio off. It remains active until the driver corrects the operating condition to bring the vehicle back within the desired profile.A secondary control component that receives instructions from the master control unit to trigger driver feedback mechanisms or govern vehicle mechanics when profile violations occur.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
2:23-cv-00607Dec 15, 2023Phelan Group, Llc V. Mercedes-Benz Group Ag
2:23-cv-00606Dec 15, 2023Phelan Group, LLC v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
2:23-cv-00094Jan 9, 2023Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc V. Lupin Ltd.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9045101

Application Number
US13858930A
Filing Date
Apr 8, 2013
Publication Date
Jun 2, 2015
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents