Method and systems for directing profile-based electronic advertisements via an intermediary ad network to visitors who later visit media properties

Patent No. US9508089 (titled "Method and systems for directing profile-based electronic advertisements via an intermediary ad network to visitors who later visit media properties") on Dec 4, 2015. The application was issued on Nov 29, 2016.

What is this patent about?

’089 is related to the field of behavioral targeting and electronic advertisement placement. Specifically, it addresses the technical and economic inefficiencies of retargeting users across different media properties when the cost of ad space may exceed the value of the user's behavioral profile.

The underlying idea behind ’089 is to integrate financial viability directly into the user-tagging process by calculating an expected profit margin before committing to a retargeting relationship. Instead of blindly tagging every visitor, the system evaluates the potential revenue from a specific user profile against the cost of ad space on a third-party property, ensuring that the behavioral targeting company only arranges for a cookie matching or tagging event when the transaction is mathematically likely to be profitable.

The claims of ’089 focus on a method where a behavioral targeting system redirects a visitor's computer to an ad network to facilitate a tag without sharing the actual profile data. The process involves recording the visitor's behavior at a first site, establishing a price cap that the targeting company is willing to pay for that specific visitor, and subsequently serving a targeted ad through the ad network only when the cost remains within that cap.

In practice, the invention functions as a gatekeeper for cross-domain tracking. When a user performs a high-value action, such as searching for a mortgage, the system calculates a revenue-per-profile metric. It then selects only those secondary media properties whose ad space costs are low enough to preserve a margin. By providing the ad network with a specific price threshold rather than the raw behavioral data, the targeting company protects its proprietary data while automating the purchase of inventory.

This approach differs from prior art like DoubleClick’s Boomerang by adding a layer of economic filtering to the technical handshake of cookie matching. Traditional systems focus on the mechanics of recognizing a user across domains regardless of cost. In contrast, this invention treats the act of tagging as a financial decision, using a profit-based selection mechanism to determine which third-party domains are authorized to track a user based on the anticipated ROI of their specific profile.

How does this patent fit in bigger picture?

Technical Landscape

In the mid-2000s when ’089 was filed, digital advertising systems commonly relied on basic cookie-matching protocols to synchronize user identifiers between disparate domains for behavioral targeting. At a time when user profiles were typically implemented using static tags or simple redirects to track cross-site navigation, the delivery of targeted content was often decoupled from the underlying financial viability of the transaction. When hardware and software constraints made real-time bidding and complex data integration non-trivial, systems generally focused on the technical feasibility of recognizing a returning visitor rather than the dynamic economic optimization of the ad placement itself. Consequently, behavioral targeting was often executed as a binary process of identification and delivery, without an integrated mechanism to evaluate the cost-efficiency of specific media properties relative to the specific attributes of a user's profile.

Prosecution Position

The disclosed invention represents a meaningful technical advancement through the architectural integration of economic valuation logic directly into the user-tagging and synchronization workflow. By implementing a system that calculates an expected profit—derived from the delta between anticipated ad revenue for a specific profile and the cost of ad space on a target media property—the invention enables a selective tagging mechanism. This architectural shift ensures that a visitor is only tagged with a domain-specific identifier if the subsequent ad delivery is projected to be profitable. This approach overcomes the technical constraint of inefficient resource allocation in cross-domain tracking, enabling a more capable and automated media selection process that aligns technical delivery with economic constraints.

Claims

This patent contains 20 claims, with claims 1, 10, and 16 serving as the independent claims. The independent claims focus on a system and method for behavioral targeting that involves redirecting a visitor to an ad network for tagging without sharing profile data, recording visitor profile information at a first site, and subsequently serving targeted advertisements based on that profile within a specified price cap. The dependent claims further refine these operations by specifying the use of cookies for tagging, detailing the redirection and bidding process, and outlining the recording of financial obligations between the targeting company and the ad network.

Key Claim Terms New

Definitions of key terms used in the patent claims.

Term (Source)Support for SpecificationInterpretation
Ad network computer
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 16)
An ad network's site represents the ad space of different sites. Once a site redirects the ad space on a page to the ad network, the ad network controls the ad space and has access to the visitor viewing the ad space. The ad network ad server can place its own cookies on the computers of visitors redirected to them by BT companies.A computer system operated by an entity that controls or represents advertising space across multiple third-party media properties and can recognize tagged visitors to serve ads.
Behavioral targeting (BT) company
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 16)
BT companies specialize in targeting ads based on observed behavior of sites' visitors, such as search, clicking content, or acquiring a product. A publisher acting without an agent and placing cookies on its own visitors for the purpose of delivering ads on other sites is also included in the definition. A BT company may also collect other kinds of profile information, such as demographic information or user-provided information.An entity or agent that specializes in targeting advertisements to visitors based on collected profile information, such as observed behavior, demographics, or user-provided data, across one or more media properties.
Electronically tag
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 16)
A tag generally is a unique identifier used to mark a person electronically visiting a media property using a computer, mobile device, or TV set. The tag is used for the purpose of delivering additional ads to a visitor to one media property when that visitor is found later on other media properties. A cookie is only one example of a possible tag.The placement of a unique identifier, such as a cookie or other digital marker, on a visitor's device or in a database to recognize the visitor or device during subsequent interactions.
Price cap
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 16)
The BT company calculates expected profit for an ad correlated with the profile and arranges for the visitor to be tagged. The profit can be calculated by deducting, from the revenues expected to be generated, at least the price of ad space at a media property. The decision to redirect can be based on the price that the BT company promised to pay for the presentation of an ad.A maximum monetary value established by the BT company representing the limit it is willing to pay a third-party media property or ad network for the opportunity to serve a targeted advertisement.
Profile information
(Claim 1, Claim 10, Claim 16)
The observed behavior of a visitor to a first media property is referred to as profile information about a specific visitor. The profile could be the observed behavior of the visitor, demographic information, or profile information provided by the visitor. A visitor's profile might be enhanced by the visitors' observed behavior on other media properties.Data representing a visitor's characteristics or actions, including observed behaviors (e.g., search keywords, content read, ads clicked), demographics, or information provided directly by the user.

Litigation Cases New

US Latest litigation cases involving this patent.

Case NumberFiling DateTitle
3:25-cv-05721Jul 8, 2025Tiktok Inc V. Almondnet, Inc.

Patent Family

Patent Family

File Wrapper

The dossier documents provide a comprehensive record of the patent's prosecution history - including filings, correspondence, and decisions made by patent offices - and are crucial for understanding the patent's legal journey and any challenges it may have faced during examination.

  • Get instant alerts for new documents

US9508089

Application Number
US14960237A
Filing Date
Dec 4, 2015
Publication Date
Nov 29, 2016
External Links
Slate, USPTO , Google Patents